Trolling on /prog/
1
Name:
Anonymous
2008-03-21 21:53
I've noticed that the rate of trolling on world4ch has been increasing in the order of n factorial.
2
Name:
Anonymous
2008-03-21 21:54
We are all trolling linearly.
3
Name:
Anonymous
2008-03-21 22:25
I'm trolling exponentially.
4
Name:
Anonymous
2008-03-21 23:43
How do I troll more effectively?
5
Name:
Anonymous
2008-03-21 23:46
>>4
forget it, trolling is NP complete.
>>4
>>4
6
Name:
Anonymous
2008-03-21 23:46
>>4
Go to ebay.
LOL GET IT?
7
Name:
Anonymous
2008-03-21 23:53
I just did a reduction from TROLL to 3SAT.
8
Name:
Anonymous
2008-03-22 5:42
>>6
I have been trolled, damn it. Also,
back to xkcd, please.
9
Name:
Anonymous
2008-03-22 6:51
Trolling is unscientific and ultimately destructive.
10
Name:
Anonymous
2008-03-22 7:58
/prog/ is unscientific and ultimately destructive .
11
Name:
Anonymous
2008-03-22 8:04
12
Name:
Anonymous
2008-03-22 8:29
>>11
scientific and ultimately constructive
13
Name:
Anonymous
2008-03-22 9:52
/prog/ is actually my favourite thing on (w)4ch
14
Name:
Anonymous
2008-03-22 9:56
>>13
4ch != 4chan != world4chan != world4ch (don't use C rules for this expression)
15
Name:
Anonymous
2008-03-22 10:23
>>11
This might surprise you, but I ended LIPS III with ``SPAWHBTC''.
16
Name:
Anonymous
2008-03-22 10:26
``w4ch'' == ``world4ch'' == true
17
Name:
Anonymous
2008-03-22 10:28
(then don't use C operators for that expression)
18
Name:
Anonymous
2008-03-22 10:36
while(1 > 0)
19
Name:
Anonymous
2008-03-22 10:47
puts("DESU");
20
Name:
Anonymous
2008-03-22 10:58
goto harmful_consideration;
21
Name:
Anonymous
2008-03-22 11:49
puts("trln");
22
Name:
Anonymous
2008-03-22 12:28
Please explain Haskell _|_
23
Name:
Anonymous
2008-03-22 12:31
>>22
lambda calculus with gay syntax
24
Name:
Anonymous
2008-03-22 12:35
25
Name:
Anonymous
2008-03-22 13:40
26
Name:
Anonymous
2008-03-23 1:36
I feel kind of bad about it :(
27
Name:
Anonymous
2008-03-23 1:38
I feel kind of bad about it :(
28
Name:
Anonymous
2008-03-23 8:24
>>22
``
bottom'' or ``
undefined''. The only value of type
forall a. a.
29
Name:
Anonymous
2008-03-25 8:24
>>28
Please explain
forall!
30
Name:
Anonymous
2008-03-25 8:27
1 forall && allfor 1
Bonus points if you can tell me the return value.
31
Name:
Anonymous
2008-03-25 8:45
>>29
``
forall'' is the universal quantifier for type variables, akin to ``∀'' in formal logic. Universal quantification of type variables is normally implicit, which means that a type signature like
($) :: (a → b) → a → b is equal to
($) :: forall a b. (a → b) → a → b. You can use the explicit (latter) form by enabling the
ExistentialQuantification GHC type extension, which also allows you to construct existentially quantified types. You can find more information about these at
http://en.wikibooks.org/wiki/Haskell/Existentially_quantified_types .
32
Name:
Anonymous
2011-02-04 15:33