Return Styles: Pseud0ch, Terminal, Valhalla, NES, Geocities, Blue Moon.

Pages: 1-

Trolling on /prog/

Name: Anonymous 2008-03-21 21:53

I've noticed that the rate of trolling on world4ch has been increasing in the order of n factorial.

Name: Anonymous 2008-03-21 21:54

We are all trolling linearly.

Name: Anonymous 2008-03-21 22:25

I'm trolling exponentially.

Name: Anonymous 2008-03-21 23:43

How do I troll more effectively?

Name: Anonymous 2008-03-21 23:46

>>4
forget it, trolling is NP complete.>>4
>>4

Name: Anonymous 2008-03-21 23:46

>>4
Go to ebay.

LOL GET IT?

Name: Anonymous 2008-03-21 23:53

I just did a reduction from TROLL to 3SAT.

Name: Anonymous 2008-03-22 5:42

>>6
I have been trolled, damn it. Also,
back to xkcd, please.

Name: Anonymous 2008-03-22 6:51

Trolling is unscientific and ultimately destructive.

Name: Anonymous 2008-03-22 7:58

/prog/ is unscientific and ultimately destructive.

Name: Anonymous 2008-03-22 8:04

Name: Anonymous 2008-03-22 8:29

>>11
scientific and ultimately constructive

Name: Anonymous 2008-03-22 9:52

/prog/ is actually my favourite thing on (w)4ch

Name: Anonymous 2008-03-22 9:56

>>13
4ch != 4chan != world4chan != world4ch (don't use C rules for this expression)

Name: Anonymous 2008-03-22 10:23

>>11
This might surprise you, but I ended LIPS III with ``SPAWHBTC''.

Name: Anonymous 2008-03-22 10:26

``w4ch'' == ``world4ch'' == true

Name: Anonymous 2008-03-22 10:28

(then don't use C operators for that expression)

Name: Anonymous 2008-03-22 10:36

while(1 > 0)

Name: Anonymous 2008-03-22 10:47

    puts("DESU");

Name: Anonymous 2008-03-22 10:58

    goto harmful_consideration;

Name: Anonymous 2008-03-22 11:49

puts("trln");

Name: Anonymous 2008-03-22 12:28

Please explain Haskell _|_

Name: Anonymous 2008-03-22 12:31

>>22
lambda calculus with gay syntax

Name: Anonymous 2008-03-22 12:35

>>23
No.

Name: Anonymous 2008-03-22 13:40

>>22
xmonad

Name: Anonymous 2008-03-23 1:36

I feel kind of bad about it :(

Name: Anonymous 2008-03-23 1:38



    I feel kind of bad about it :(

Name: Anonymous 2008-03-23 8:24

>>22
``bottom'' or ``undefined''. The only value of type forall a. a.

Name: Anonymous 2008-03-25 8:24

>>28
Please explain forall!

Name: Anonymous 2008-03-25 8:27

1 forall && allfor 1
Bonus points if you can tell me the return value.

Name: Anonymous 2008-03-25 8:45

>>29
``forall'' is the universal quantifier for type variables, akin to ``∀'' in formal logic. Universal quantification of type variables is normally implicit, which means that a type signature like ($) :: (a → b) → a → b is equal to ($) :: forall a b. (a → b) → a → b. You can use the explicit (latter) form by enabling the ExistentialQuantification GHC type extension, which also allows you to construct existentially quantified types. You can find more information about these at http://en.wikibooks.org/wiki/Haskell/Existentially_quantified_types.

Name: Anonymous 2011-02-04 15:33

Name: Anonymous 2011-02-18 14:04

<-- check 'em dubz
Don't change these.
Name: Email:
Entire Thread Thread List