SICP is not for children!
1
Name:
Anonymous
2008-03-14 17:16
HAHAHAHAHAHA. Go talk to anyone who actually works in the programming industry who the vast majority of wizard books are targeted for. Guess who they will say? Children and young teens.
>>Go to America you will see grownups with SICP ringtones, and anything SICP you will see for yourself
Bullshit.
You knights who are still under this impression that SICP is mainstream (which it isn't outside of things like MIT) and is the same as satorization you really need to read this: http://www.thinkartlab.com/pkl/media/SUSHIS_LOGICS.pdf
In the end, SICP is not read by everyone in america. It is not mainstream. Thinking in C++ on the other hand is mainstream within the american society.
2
Name:
Anonymous
2008-03-14 17:17
My other car is a cdr.
3
Name:
Anonymous
2008-03-14 17:26
>>1
This is a good post. I support this.
4
Name:
Anonymous
2008-03-14 17:36
>>1
i lol'd without rhyme or reason
5
Name:
Anonymous
2008-03-14 17:38
Sushi's logics is too abstract for me.
6
Name:
Anonymous
2008-03-14 17:53
7
Name:
testing
2008-03-14 17:57
1
1 1
1 2 1
1 3 3 1
1 4 6 4 1
1 5 10 10 5 1
1 6 15 20 15 6 1
1 7 21 35 35 21 7 1
1 8 28 56 70 56 28 8 1
1 9 36 84 126 126 84 36 9 1
1 10 45 120 210 252 210 120 45 10 1
1 11 55 165 330 462 462 330 165 55 11 1
8
Name:
Anonymous
2008-03-14 17:58
1
1 1
1 2 1
1 3 3 1
1 4 6 4 1
1 5 10 10 5 1
1 6 15 20 15 6 1
1 7 21 35 35 21 7 1
1 8 28 56 70 56 28 8 1
1 9 36 84 126 126 84 36 9 1
1 10 45 120 210 252 210 120 45 10 1
1 11 55 165 330 462 462 330 165 55 11 1
9
Name:
Anonymous
2008-03-14 17:59
10
Name:
Anonymous
2008-03-14 18:01
>>9
I'm not clikking your link.
11
Name:
Anonymous
2008-03-14 18:02
>>10
Yes you are, I see you in the Apache logs.
12
Name:
Anonymous
2008-03-14 18:03
>>7,8
Did you mean:
int *pascal(int n)
{
int *row = malloc((n + 1) * sizeof(int));
int *prev_row;
int i;
if (n == 0)
row[0] = 1;
else {
prev_row = pascal(n - 1);
row[0] = row[n] = 1;
for (i = 1; i < n; i++)
row[i] = prev_row[i - 1] + prev_row[i];
free(prev_row);
}
return row;
}
13
Name:
Anonymous
2008-03-14 18:05
>>12
Did you mean:
fact 0 = 1
fact x = (fact x) * (fact (x - 1))
14
Name:
Anonymous
2008-03-14 18:10
>>13
Did you mean:
print "hello world!"
15
Name:
Anonymous
2008-03-14 18:13
>>14
Did you mean:
__print__ """hello world!"""
16
Name:
Anonymous
2008-03-14 18:16
from ___future___ import __print__
17
Name:
SAGE
2008-03-14 18:18
M-butterfly
18
Name:
Anonymous
2008-03-14 18:53
>>16
GET THE FUCK BACK TO XKCD AND COME BACK WHEN YOU LEARN EMACS
19
Name:
Anonymous
2008-03-14 18:54
[code] from ___future___ import __future__[code]
20
Name:
Anonymous
2008-03-14 18:55
>>15
Hey, I invented hating """triple quotes""" and __double underscores__ in Python!
21
Name:
Anonymous
2008-03-14 18:58
>>19
BBCode failure detected.
22
Name:
Anonymous
2008-03-14 20:05
back to /vip/, please
23
Name:
Anonymous
2008-03-14 22:54
24
Name:
Anonymous
2008-03-14 23:00
>>2
This is a good post. I support this.
25
Name:
Anonymous
2008-03-15 6:54
>>23
Hm, interesting, I wondered why Sushi's Logics linked to that site, now I understand. (For the uninitiated, Sushi's Logics is about A++)
26
Name:
Anonymous
2008-03-15 7:08
>>25
No, it's beyond A++ or programming.
SUSHIS LOGICS just is.
27
Name:
Anonymous
2008-03-15 8:21
>>18
YOU come back when you learn emacs. Try this:
(global-set-key "\M-b" nil)
(global-set-key "\M-butterfly" 'slime)
28
Name:
Anonymous
2008-03-15 9:13
>>26
Well, that chapter with the picture, at least.
29
Name:
Anonymous
2008-03-15 10:21
>>27
Oh no, you didn't! Since when is Randall Munroe making jokes based on customised EMACS?
30
Name:
Anonymous
2008-03-15 10:29
>>9
Who are those and why are they wearing Reimu and Suika's clothes?
31
Name:
Anonymous
2008-03-15 10:32
>>30
They are together like a
car and a
cudder .
http://www.cs.utah.edu/~draperg/cartoons/scheme_car_cdr.png
Which tells you how to pronounce
cdr .
32
Name:
Anonymous
2008-03-15 11:26
>>29
At least since 2008/02/02
33
Name:
Anonymous
2008-03-17 1:43
1 1
1 2 1
1 3 3 1
1 4 6 4 1
1 5 10 10 5 1
1 6 15 20 15 6 1
1 7 21 35 35 21 7 1
1 8 28 56 70 56 28 8 1
1 9 36 84 126 126 84 36 9 1
1 10 45 120 210 252 210 120 45 10 1
1 11 55 165 330 462 462 330 165 55 11 1
34
Name:
Anonymous
2008-03-17 1:59
>>31
Sussman and Abelson pronounce it ``could-her''
35
Name:
Anonymous
2008-03-19 11:42
FREEBASIC
36
Name:
Anonymous
2008-03-19 12:21
37
Name:
Anonymous
2008-03-19 18:42
DO NOT USE RECURSION WHEN THERE IS A CLEAR ITERATIVE SOLUTION
38
Name:
Anonymous
2008-03-19 18:45
>>37
When all you have is recursion, everything looks like parentheses.
39
Name:
Anonymous
2008-03-19 19:01
DO NOT USE ITERATION WHEN THERE IS A CLEAR RECURSIVE SOLUTION
40
Name:
Anonymous
2008-03-19 19:09
DO NOT USE RECURSION WHEN THERE IS A CLEAR RECURSIVE SOLUTION
41
Name:
Anonymous
2008-03-19 19:14
DNURWTHACIS NOT USE RECURSION WHEN THERE IS A CLEAR ITERATIVE SOLUTION
42
Name:
Anonymous
2008-03-19 21:43
43
Name:
Anonymous
2009-03-06 6:46
The compiler ignores his.
44
Name:
Anonymous
2011-01-31 21:23
<-- check em dubz
45
Name:
Anonymous
2011-02-03 5:55