Return Styles: Pseud0ch, Terminal, Valhalla, NES, Geocities, Blue Moon. Entire thread

self learning programming?

Name: Anonymous 2008-02-14 21:36

Yes I'm a major newfag, but I was wondering what is the easiest and most efficient way to self-teach myself C++?

Name: Anonymous 2008-02-15 16:57

>>40
Oh damn you, my laughing woke up my dog.

Name: Anonymous 2008-02-15 17:06

>>41
Oh damn you, my master woke me up with his laughing.

Name: Anonymous 2008-02-15 17:18

>>41
Oh damn you, my master bitch woke me up with his her laughing.

Name: Anonymous 2008-02-15 17:22

>>42
Is that Haskell speaking from beyond his grave?

Name: Anonymous 2008-02-15 17:22

>>42
Shut up haskell.

Name: Anonymous 2008-02-15 17:28

>>42
Haskell nooooooooooo

Name: Anonymous 2008-02-15 19:09

>>32
I'm pretty sure you can't get higher than 197 or so.

Name: Anonymous 2008-02-16 8:55

>>47
I go over 9000

Name: Anonymous 2008-02-16 9:24

>>47
>>29 proves that you can.

Name: Anonymous 2008-02-16 12:13

>>29
Programmer's time is more valuable than computer's time, a Haskelite might say.

It's funny how only people using ridiculously inefficient languages believe this shit.

Name: Anonymous 2008-02-16 12:14

A programmer's time is more valuable than a computer's, but not infinitely so.

Name: Anonymous 2008-02-16 12:18

>>34
YHBT.

Name: Anonymous 2008-02-16 19:28

>>51
but not infinitely so
what does that mean?

Name: Anonymous 2008-02-16 19:34

>>53
[b]ABSTRACT BULLSHITE WARNING[/u]


That means that programmer's time has some ``load value'' -- much smaller than the one of computer's time. If programmer's time's ``load value'' were 0, it would always be wiser to write a quick program. In reality, you can sometimes write a program quickly, but it would be so slow that it would have been better if the programmer had took time to make it better -- the computer would execute it much more faster, more than compensating the time taken to write it.

Oh fuck I suck at explaining.

Name: Anonymous 2008-02-16 19:35

>>54
oh damn, I am so sleepy that I even fail at BBCode.

Name: Anonymous 2008-02-18 22:06

[U]VIPPER FAIL[I]S[/I] AT BBCODE

Name: Anonymous 2008-02-18 22:06

VIPPER FAILS AT BBCODE

Name: Anonymous 2008-02-18 22:07

VIPPER FAILS AT BBCODE

Name: Anonymous 2010-11-15 9:36

Name: Anonymous 2010-12-22 18:17

Name: Anonymous 2011-02-04 12:15

<

Newer Posts
Don't change these.
Name: Email:
Entire Thread Thread List