Return Styles: Pseud0ch, Terminal, Valhalla, NES, Geocities, Blue Moon. Entire thread

The Sussman's take on /prog/'s SICP fan club

Name: Anonymous 2008-02-13 9:44

Your message was perhaps one of the strangest pieces of email I have ever received. Although it is flattering to have a ``fan club'', in fact, it is a very bad idea. Unlike most of human society, science and engineering are based on the idea that each of us is capable of evaluating evidence and thinking on our own. Each of us can do experiments, work out the reasoning, and determine the truth for ourselves. There is no room in science or engineering for ``fans'' representing group approval over individual thought. One of my heros, Galileo, put it very well:

In questions of science, the authority of a thousand is not worth the humble reasoning of a single individual.

I am pleased to talk with people about matters of science or engineering, so you and your colleagues may certainly send me mail. I hope to learn as much from your experiences as you may learn for me. But please get rid of the ``cult of personality'' way of thinking. It is unscientific and ultimately destructive.

Name: Anonymous 2008-02-14 5:33

>>40
Learn to RPN.

Name: Anonymous 2008-02-14 5:49

>>38
Install the SUMO package.

Name: Anonymous 2008-02-14 5:56

>>42
How.

Name: Anonymous 2008-02-14 6:07

>>43
Google "xemacs sumo"

Name: Anonymous 2008-02-14 7:15

>>1
This is a real freakin embarassment. I'm shamed to be associated with /prog/

Name: Anonymous 2008-02-14 7:43

>>45
Associated?
You are anonymous moron.

Name: Anonymous 2008-02-14 7:47

>>46
Yeah, I'm ashamed to be associated with such a moron.

Name: Anonymous 2008-02-14 7:51

>>45
Same here

Name: Anonymous 2008-02-14 8:39

Did someone submit /prog/ to digg or something?

Name: Anonymous 2008-02-14 9:14

GUN, UNIX is Not

Name: Anonymous 2008-02-14 10:26

/prog/ NEEDS A WILLING GODDESS, NOT ONE WHO SPURNS OUR LOVE.

Name: Anonymous 2008-02-14 11:11

...tar: ./xemacs-packages/lib-src/pstogif: Cannot open: No such file or directory
tar: ./xemacs-packages/lib-src/tm-au: Cannot open: No such file or directory
tar: ./xemacs-packages/lib-src/tmdecode: Cannot open: No such file or directory
tar: ./xemacs-packages/lib-src/tm-file: Cannot open: No such file or directory
tar: ./xemacs-packages/lib-src/tm-html: Cannot open: No such file or directory
tar: ./xemacs-packages/lib-src/tm-image: Cannot open: No such file or directory
...


What the heck, why my SUMO not work?

Name: Anonymous 2008-02-14 11:21

I can tell from the pixels, and from seeing a lot of photoshops in my time, etc.

Name: Anonymous 2008-02-14 16:13

There is a hidden program inside of his message. It is recursive and prints out "READ SICP"

Name: Anonymous 2008-02-16 16:34

>>53
Not a shoop, I'm more than willing to forward you the email.

Name: Anonymous 2008-02-16 16:57

Not a shoop, I'm more than willing to forward you the PHOTOSHOPPED email.
Fixed. Also, I am a security expert, I know what I am talking about.

Name: Anonymous 2008-02-16 18:33

>>56
Apparently not, since you'd be able to examine the email headers.

Nigger expert, maybe.

Name: Anonymous 2008-02-16 18:35

Unless it's PGP signed, it's forged.

Name: Anonymous 2008-02-16 18:45

The email headers could easily have been forged. A PGP signature would throw away all doubt, however...

Does /prog/ want its glorious leader to renounce it?

However, OP is definitely an agent of the anticudder, and will surely die by the hand of the Knights of λ.

Name: Anonymous 2008-02-16 18:52

What the fuck is this shit?

inb4 angered an expert programmer

Name: Anonymous 2008-02-16 19:01

>>60
Someone sent an email to Gerald Jay Sussman, professor of EE at MIT and coauthor of The Structure and Interpretation of Computer Programs.  He was understandably confused.

Name: Anonymous 2008-02-16 19:22

>>58
Forge an email to Gerry Sussman about 4chan?

Why don't you email him yourself and ask him?

Name: Anonymous 2008-02-16 19:31

>There is no room in science or engineering for ``fans''
>One of my heros, Galileo

Wait, what?

Name: Anonymous 2008-02-16 19:55

>>63
There's a difference between having a figure of inspiration (a ``hero'', if you will) and blind sheep-like fanboyism, which is 99% of /prog/

Also, 40h get.

Name: lol !8mQB/2odm6 2008-02-16 22:24

>>63
Lol'd.

Name: Anonymous 2008-02-16 23:55

>>64
I was under the impression that most of /prog/ took the whole ``read SICP'' thing as a big in-joke.

Name: Anonymous 2008-02-17 0:33

>>66
You're wrong.

Name: Anonymous 2008-02-17 0:35

>>66
HAHAHAHA

``READ SICP FAGGOT''

Name: Anonymous 2008-02-17 0:47

>>66
YOU DO NOT UNDERSTAND /prog/

Name: Anonymous 2008-02-17 4:51

The Books is a meme, but it is one for a reason.

Name: Anonymous 2008-02-17 5:34

>>40
require('facepalm)

Name: Anonymous 2008-02-17 5:51

>>71
(load facepalm.scm)

Name: Anonymous 2008-02-17 7:49

>>63
The Sussman has been owned.

He's not a god anymore. And SICP sucks.

Quo vadis, /prog/?

Name: Anonymous 2008-02-17 7:50

I had killed The Sussman, who was the head of a snake. Shit.

Name: Anonymous 2008-02-17 8:01

>>64
``fan'' is after all short for ``fanatic''.

Name: Anonymous 2008-02-17 8:27

>>75
From the Latin ``vannus'', meaning ``winnowing basket''.

Name: Anonymous 2008-02-17 13:04

He didn't mention satori, cudder or λ, but he sounded really wise and modest, just like the Great Master should sound.
I am deeply impressed.

Name: Anonymous 2008-02-17 13:54

>>63
You have been trolled... by The Sussman, of course.

Name: Anonymous 2008-02-17 22:10

Your message was perhaps one of human society, science or engineering for ourselves. There is not worth the idea that each of science, the reasoning, and thinking on our own. Each of science and your colleagues may certainly send me mail. I am pleased to talk with people about matters of thinking. It is no room in fact, it is unscientific and thinking on the strangest pieces of us can do experiments, work out the strangest pieces of us can do experiments, work out the idea that each of science, the reasoning, and determine the strangest pieces of evaluating evidence and engineering for ourselves.

There is a very bad idea.

Unlike most of us can do experiments, work out the reasoning, and determine the truth for ourselves. There is no room in fact, it is no room in science or engineering, so you and thinking on the idea that each of the strangest pieces of us can do experiments, work out the truth for me. But please get rid of email I have ever received. Although it is not worth the truth for ``fans'' representing group approval over individual thought. One of a single individual. I hope to talk with people about matters of the ``cult of science or engineering for me. But please get rid of a very bad idea. Unlike most of science, the humble reasoning of science or engineering, so you and thinking on our own. Each of the ``cult of the truth for me. But please get rid of science, the idea that each of us can do experiments, work out the idea that each of a thousand is unscientific and determine the ``cult of science and your colleagues may learn for me. But please get rid of a single individual. I am pleased to learn for me. But please get rid of the humble reasoning of us is not worth the idea that each of my heros, Galileo, put it is capable of a thousand is capable of evaluating evidence and ultimately destructive.

Name: Anonymous 2008-02-17 22:20

>>79
More disassociated-press, please.

Newer Posts
Don't change these.
Name: Email:
Entire Thread Thread List