I ran the tests several more times and it turns out that code written using K&R style bracing is almost 1% faster than code written using Allman style!
hello im Simon the Haskellite join my community of nomads if you payme enough i will give you access to a private area of typechecking ;)
irc://chat.freenode.net/haskell
«The book never lives up to all the hype surrounding it. In fact, of the over 50 people I know who had the misfortune to study out of it, none liked it. I imagine only a few crazy souls who care about nothing but dry computer languages theory would even consider this worth reading.
Recursion and information hiding via procedural/object code is nothing mysterious and is taught in all other CS classes, so the text adds nothing new. It merely retells the same old obvious programming techniques using a very poorly designed language (Scheme) and using completely uneducational examples. In short, this book is an overrated waste of time. If you are familiar with structured programming in a language like C++, you won't get anything new out of this. In fact, any topic presented here is better learned elsewhere, since the text is just one of those poorly written books that try to be encyclopedic at the expense of being interesting and thorough.»
>>62
Now let's add all kinds of syntax and special cases to hide what is going on!
Name:
Anonymous2008-05-03 15:46
cdr
Name:
Anonymous2008-05-03 16:06
Have you read your SAMS TEACH YOURSELF SCHEME IN 24 HOURS today?
Name:
Anonymous2008-05-03 16:14
This is THE SUSSMAN,
My only friend, THE SUSSMAN.
Name:
Anonymous2008-05-03 20:25
SAGE FUCKING THE FUTURE, WELCOME TO BITCHES.
Name:
Anonymous2009-04-07 21:55
So isn't SICP good anymore?:(
Name:
Anonymous2009-04-07 22:03
>>68 THE SUSSMEN himself said that SICP is still "right on" despite being obsoleted by 6.01, so grab yourself a copy of SICP, learn some fucking Scheme and achieve satori. Fuck what THE SUSSMEN says, SICP is still relevant!