VIM VS EMACS
1
Name:
Anonymous
2008-01-22 19:46
IT'S BEEN A LONG TIME SINCE THE LAST DISCUSSION ABOUT THIS.
2
Name:
Anonymous
2008-01-22 20:07
When I use an editor, I don't want eight extra KILOBYTES of worthless help screens and cursor positioning code! I just want an ED itor! viitor ". Not a "emacsitor ". Those aren't even WORDS! ED! ED! ED IS THE STANDARD!
3
Name:
Anonymous
2008-01-22 20:19
notepad.
4
Name:
Anonymous
2008-01-22 20:34
Acme. Name says it all.
5
Name:
Anonymous
2008-01-22 20:52
>>3
$ notepad
6
Name:
Anonymous
2008-01-22 20:54
7
Name:
Wile E.
2008-01-22 20:56
8
Name:
Anonymous
2008-01-22 21:16
Emacs? No thank you. I prefer with my current operating system, shell, and windowing environment.
9
Name:
Anonymous
2008-01-22 21:18
>>8
Unless those are Emacs, Emacs, and Emacs,
ur a faggot .
10
Name:
Anonymous
2008-01-22 21:46
When I first used Emacs, I thought I was playing some sort of esoteric Japenese stepmania clone, what with all the key shortcuts.
11
Name:
Anonymous
2008-01-22 21:48
When I first use Emacs, I switched back to vim.
12
Name:
Anonymous
2008-01-22 21:48
Used, even.
13
Name:
Anonymous
2008-01-22 21:56
>>11
Is that meant to be some sort of satire of my post (
>>10 )
14
Name:
Anonymous
2008-01-22 22:00
>>13
Satire? I only post satori.
15
Name:
Anonymous 2008-01-22 23:44
>>14
That's it, thread over.
16
Name:
Anonymous
2008-01-23 17:54
17
Name:
Anonymous
2008-01-23 18:53
does grub incorporate boot suport for emacs?
18
Name:
Anonymous
2008-01-23 19:13
>>17
No, but you can use grub 2 with
multiboot.el.
19
Name:
Anonymous
2009-03-18 3:45
I wants lots and lots of some delectable pot!
21
Name:
Anonymous 2011-02-03 4:02