Return Styles: Pseud0ch, Terminal, Valhalla, NES, Geocities, Blue Moon.

Pages: 1-4041-

Notepad.exe or WordPad.exe

Name: Anonymous 2008-01-19 19:31

IT'S BEEN A LONG TIME SINCE THE LAST DISCUSSION ABOUT THIS.

Name: Anonymous 2008-01-19 19:34

why the .exe? I have an executable flag in my filesystem. Don't you?

Name: Anonymous 2008-01-19 19:34

WINDOWS (faggot) APPLICATIONS ARE NOT TEXT EDITORS!

Name: Anonymous 2008-01-19 19:37

WordPad with customised syntax highlight and indentation.

Name: Anonymous 2008-01-19 19:49

>>4
Upload your patch set?

Name: Anonymous 2008-01-19 19:51

ed

Name: Anonymous 2008-01-19 19:56

Notepad2.exe

Name: Anonymous 2008-01-19 22:10

metapad.

Name: Anonymous 2008-01-19 22:56

When I use an editor, I don't want eight extra KILOBYTES of worthless
help screens and cursor positioning code!  I just want an EDitor!!
Not a "Notepad.exeitor".  Not a "WordPad.exeitor".  Those aren't even WORDS!!!!
ED! ED! ED IS THE STANDARD!!!

Name: Anonymous 2008-01-20 6:07

Notepad++

Name: Anonymous 2008-01-20 6:34

E

Name: Anonymous 2008-01-20 6:38

EDIT.COM

Name: Anonymous 2008-01-20 7:10

cat.exe > file
Fits MY needs. I never fail

Name: Anonymous 2008-01-20 8:29

>>13
Lol PowerShell.
Get a real OS.

Name: Anonymous 2008-01-20 9:48

it works in cmd.exe faggot

Name: Anonymous 2008-01-20 11:44

>>15
My point (re: real OS) still stands. If anything, it's strengthened, since PowerShell does make Windows marginally less painful.

Name: Anonymous 2008-01-20 14:01

>>16 Yes it does. But you could just use cygwin's bash instead of PowerShell. it's better (but only if you're lacking a decente OS, of course)

Name: Anonymous 2008-01-20 22:14

>>17
So you are telling us to replace a shell that supports monads by RMS faggotry? Great idea really.

Name: Anonymous 2008-01-21 6:51

>>18
In english please.

Name: Anonymous 2008-01-21 7:13

>>19
lrn2Haskell

Name: Anonymous 2008-01-21 7:57

>>20
HASKELL?

HASKELL NOMADS?

Name: Anonymous 2008-01-21 8:07

>>21
Haskell is dead.

Name: Anonymous 2008-01-21 8:16

>>22
Haskell was never properly born.

Name: Anonymous 2008-01-21 8:39

>>22
I laughed heartily. If anything, Haskell is coming alive.

Name: Anonymous 2008-01-21 8:58

>>24
Nice job screwing with the 1-post quote scope in >>16-23.
Now my laptop monitor is loose.

Name: Anonymous 2008-01-21 9:45

>>25
I don't care.

Name: Anonymous 2008-01-21 12:50

>>27
I care.

Name: Anonymous 2008-01-22 0:59

fish shell > *

Name: Anonymous 2008-01-22 1:54

>>28

posix? wuts that lol?

Name: Anonymous 2008-01-22 2:23

>>29
legacy faggotry that force shells to be user-hostile

Name: Anonymous 2008-01-22 3:53

>>27
Stack overflow.

Name: Anonymous 2008-01-22 17:56

>>30

So what should we do about it? I know! Let's use different keywords and symbols for the EXACT SAME THINGS! That way, real shell scripts and functions don't work in our new shell, scripts and functions written for our shell won't work in real shells, and EVERYBODY has to learn new syntax, not just new shell users. Brilliant!

Wait, hasn't somebody tried this before? I think it was called the PASCAL Shell or the COBOL Shell or something like that. Wasn't that one considered harmful at some point?

Name: Anonymous 2008-01-22 20:52

>>32
You idiot, don't try to run bash scripts in some other shell. You act like there haven't always been lots of shells.

Name: Anonymous 2008-01-22 20:58

>>33
Bash at least (mostly) supports the common subset of shell syntax that POSIX specifies.

Name: Anonymous 2008-01-22 21:13

As an aside, Zsh is even worse than Fish. It mostly uses POSIX syntax, changing it in a few, subtle ways. At least with Fish you know from the start that you're going to have to change everything. Changes in word splitting behavior can cause some nasty bugs. Plus, Fish doesn't have the gall to source the global profile on startup.

Name: Anonymous 2008-01-22 21:19

>>34
That's immaterial though. Run scripts in the shell they were written for and you won't have a problem.

Name: Anonymous 2008-01-22 21:25

>>36
There's a shell script that's run by almost every shell. It's called /etc/profile. If a shell doesn't use POSIX syntax, it can't read it, and doesn't have a properly set-up environment. If it has broken, POSIX-like syntax, it may cause strange errors.

Having a separate profile in /etc for each shell is like maintaining separate versions of a web site for each browser. It's much harder to maintain: any changes have to be duplicated across several files, and the maintainer needs to know the subtle differences between each syntax.

Name: Anonymous 2008-01-22 22:08

>>37
It just sets environment variables. Worst case: your fancy shell runs /etc/profile in another shell, then inherits that environment. Or just use your fancy shell as a login shell. There's no particular reason to do that.

Name: Anonymous 2008-01-22 22:08

>>38
just don't use

Name: Anonymous 2008-01-23 0:04

ksh93 > tcsh > zsh > * > bloated shells that lack basic features (bash, fish, pdksh)

Name: Anonymous 2008-01-23 0:29

es > *

Name: Anonymous 2008-01-23 0:50

>>41

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Es_shell
Unlike other modern shells, es does not have job control.

Fuck that.

Name: Anonymous 2008-01-23 1:16

Name: Anonymous 2008-01-23 9:00

>>40
>tcsh
M-MASTER TROLL.

Name: Anonymous 2008-01-23 9:35

>>43
Then obviously, Ruby is the best shell.
Discussion closed.

Name: Anonymous 2008-01-23 20:10

http://www.scsh.net/
Discussion closed.

Name: Anonymous 2008-01-23 20:11

Editpad Pro

Name: Anonymous 2009-03-06 12:44

The stack sprintf strcpy strcat gets etc   are vuln to.

Name: Anonymous 2009-03-06 13:03


Since other people wrote the code who   no longer work   with us and   all of a   line and that   it impinged on   his personal integrity   as a programmer   Array functions are   as powerful as   webpages as structured   as it seems   the more mature   part of it   Do you get.

Name: Anonymous 2010-11-15 1:25

Name: Anonymous 2011-02-03 3:30

Name: Anonymous 2011-02-04 15:31

Name: Anonymous 2011-12-19 14:19

Name: Anonymous 2011-12-19 14:19

Wordpad.exe all the way

Name: Anonymous 2011-12-19 14:35

>>55
nice dubs /b/roski

Name: Anonymous 2011-12-19 15:19

᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈ ᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈​᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈ ᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈ ᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈​᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈ ᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈ ᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈​᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈ ᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈ ᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈​᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈ ᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈ ᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈​᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈ ᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈ ᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈​᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈ ᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈ ᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈​᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈ ᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈ ᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈​᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈ ᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈ ᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈​᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈ ᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈᷈
The previous post has been hidden.

Name: Anonymous 2011-12-19 15:23

Notepad.exe & Wordpad.exe: From the company that gave us Edlin!

Name: Anonymous 2011-12-19 15:26

>>57
Are those Non-Recognized-by-Firefox characters supposed to be like that Zalgo-shit or whatever?

Name: Anonymous 2011-12-19 15:33

>>59
Back to the imageboards, please!

Name: Anonymous 2011-12-19 15:36

>>60
Your the one shitposting here. Yuo cun't yet tell people go to imageboards . First you must become VIP like me.

Name: Anonymous 2011-12-20 4:52

>>61
PISS OFF, tokiko

Don't change these.
Name: Email:
Entire Thread Thread List