Return Styles: Pseud0ch, Terminal, Valhalla, NES, Geocities, Blue Moon.

Pages: 1-

What scheme do you guys use?

Name: Anonymous 2008-01-17 21:45

SICP was based on the MIT/GNU Scheme.  An important consideration.
For some reason I've grown attached to Larceny.  I know it's not necessarily a good idea to implement standards just because they're new, but still it's a nice little implementation.

Name: Anonymous 2008-01-17 21:47

plt

Name: Anonymous 2008-01-17 21:58

Clisp

Name: Anonymous 2008-01-17 22:12

CLisp

Name: Anonymous 2008-01-17 23:27

CLIsp

Name: Anonymous 2008-01-18 0:05

CLISp

Name: Anonymous 2008-01-18 0:05

CLISP

Name: Anonymous 2008-01-18 0:05

cLISP

Name: Anonymous 2008-01-18 0:05

clISP

Name: Anonymous 2008-01-18 0:05

cliSP

Name: Anonymous 2008-01-18 0:06

clisP

Name: Anonymous 2008-01-18 0:06

clisp

Name: Anonymous 2008-01-18 0:06

goto >>3

Name: Anonymous 2008-01-18 0:49

If I just want to dick with a Scheme I use Scheme 48. No reason. The only Scheme I've actually done anything with is whatever Lilypond uses. I wouldn't program in Scheme normally (don't cudder me!).

Name: Anonymous 2008-01-18 3:42

This is the worst thread on /prog/

Name: Anonymous 2008-01-18 4:34

R6RS I implemented when I was 3, in PLT Scheme

Name: Anonymous 2008-01-18 5:07

I've never used Scheme, and have no plans to ever use it.

Name: Anonymous 2008-01-18 5:19

>>17
Why on earth would you hang out on /prog/ if you have no Scheming plans?

Name: Anonymous 2008-01-18 6:42

Name: Anonymous 2008-01-18 8:09

scm, faggots.

Name: Anonymous 2008-01-18 10:12

Ruby

Name: Anonymous 2008-01-18 12:53

>>21 on Fails.

Name: Anonymous 2009-03-18 3:25

I'm feeling really keen, for some of that good ol' green

Marijuana MUST be legalized.

Don't change these.
Name: Email:
Entire Thread Thread List