Return Styles: Pseud0ch, Terminal, Valhalla, NES, Geocities, Blue Moon.

Pages: 1-4041-8081-

How many LOC have you written in 2007?

Name: Anonymous 2008-01-11 6:26

How many LOC have you written in 2007?

Name: Anonymous 2008-01-11 6:50

Less than nine thousand.

Name: Anonymous 2008-01-11 7:04

7. All of them as code snippets in a /prog/ post.

Name: Anonymous 2008-01-11 7:20

around 50 thousand

Name: Anonymous 2008-01-11 7:25

1 line with over nine thousand characters in it. Valid Perl one-liner, of course.


(Oh, wow, I've accidentally clicked on "Reply" when just typed "1" and seems that it triggered some FORCED SPAM PROTECTION and got me b& in an instant.)

Name: Anonymous 2008-01-11 7:36

>>5
yeah, if your message is just an `N' yuo get banned.

Name: Anonymous 2008-01-11 7:40

Oh really?  I've got to try that out!  See you in a month.

Name: Anonymous 2008-01-11 8:16

>>7
It's not only a month - I just got my ISP's proxy server permanently banned from all boards.

Name: Anonymous 2008-01-11 8:17

>>7
See you in a month.
hahaha oh wow

"Your ban was filed on January 11th, 2008. This ban will not expire."

Name: Anonymous 2008-01-11 9:15

N­­­­­­

Name: >>10 2008-01-11 9:16

Well don't I look like a fucking newfag for believing that; good job >>6,8 lulz. inb4 YHBT. YHL. HAND.

Name: Anonymous 2008-01-11 9:41

So, right now I'm with 59008.
I'm going to wait until the end of the day so I write some more lines.

Name: Anonymous 2008-01-11 10:59

>>3 Are you a Haskeller?
>>4 Are you a Java E N T E R P R I S E   P R O G R A M M E R?

Name: Anonymous 2008-01-11 11:25

>>10,11
With N i ment a number. moron.

Name: Anonymous 2008-01-11 12:37

Over 9000.

Name: Anonymous 2008-01-11 12:52

9001­­­­­­

Name: >>10,11,16 2008-01-11 12:53

>>14
Still not detecting any change, captain. Also, only faggots put numbers in ``quotes''. Quotes are for ``strings''.

Name: Anonymous 2008-01-11 13:06

7­­­­­­

Name: Anonymous 2008-01-11 13:06

>>17
Quotes are for abstract concepts.
A number is an abstract concept that you will never comprehend.

Name: Anonymous 2008-01-11 13:07

lol it really is just a troll.

you got me.

Name: Anonymous 2008-01-11 13:07

>>17
What about `(,N) ?

Name: Anonymous 2008-01-11 13:10

Or `,N

Name: Anonymous 2008-01-11 13:13

>>20
Am I good or what

Name: Anonymous 2008-01-11 14:00

what

Name: Anonymous 2008-01-11 14:21

what is loc?

Name: Anonymous 2008-01-11 14:26

yo' momma

Name: Anonymous 2008-01-11 14:36

>>12
Is this Haskell?

Name: Anonymous 2008-01-11 16:24

Is there a C mode for Emacs?

Name: Anonymous 2008-01-11 16:59

>>28
No, Emacs is coded in LISP and run through Emacs.

Name: Anonymous 2008-01-11 17:08

How many LOC have you written in 2008?

Over 1000

Name: Anonymous 2008-01-11 17:24

>>4
I'd wager you are a horrible programmer. You shouldn't be proud of the lines of code you wrote, but rather of the lines of code you avoided writing. Every line of code not written is a correct one. More lines of code is a bad thing, not a good thing.

Good programmers write small amounts of code. Of course, the requirements must still be met, though the solution with less code is a better solution than the one with more.

Name: Anonymous 2008-01-11 17:34

>>31
He didn't say what he wrote or how many programs he wrote.

Name: Anonymous 2008-01-11 17:37

>>31
Okay, then. This thread is now about how many LOC you didn't write.

Name: Anonymous 2008-01-11 17:38

>>32
I know, but given the fixed amount of time in 2007, 50K lines is a lot, regardless. If he wrote 5K 100 line programs, then I'd argue they must have been sloppy programs for him to write that many in the given time. I don't think that changes anything.

Name: Anonymous 2008-01-11 17:40

I didn't write 300 lines. At the [b][u]E N T E R P R I S E[/b][/u] we use [b][u]E X T R E M E   P R O G R A M M I N G[/b][/u], the other guy was programming.

Name: Anonymous 2008-01-11 17:41

>>35 You fail at [b][u]BBCode[/b][/u]

Name: Anonymous 2008-01-11 17:42

>>35,36 SAME PERSON. Use a stack

Name: Anonymous 2008-01-11 18:26

>>35,36
BBCode uses a last-in, first-out type data structure when dealing with tags.

Name: Anonymous 2008-01-11 19:10

>>17
I got permab& for posting this single character as the whole post. ``0''.

Name: Anonymous 2008-01-11 19:23

>>39
0

Name: Anonymous 2008-01-11 19:24

hghjkhjhjkh

Name: Anonymous 2008-01-11 21:01

>>40
character as the whole post

Name: Anonymous 2008-01-11 22:50

>>42 see >>44.

Name: Anonymous 2008-01-11 22:50

0­­­­­

Name: Anonymous 2008-01-12 1:11

5000 or so maybe.

Name: Anonymous 2008-01-12 1:35

Hard to say. But I've written 93 lines of Haskell code today. I'm new to Haskell so I've spent most of the day refactoring the same code. If we say I've written 93 lines per day since the 1st then that would total to 1116.

Name: Anonymous 2008-01-12 2:11

I write maybe a couple dozen klocs, but code generated many, many more.

Name: Anonymous 2008-01-12 7:04

A COUPLE DUZEN CLOCKS!

Name: Anonymous 2008-01-12 7:23

>>46
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brfxxccxxmnpcccclllmmnprxvclmnckssqlbb11116

Name: Anonymous 2008-01-12 8:00

LOC is not a measure of productivity.

Name: Anonymous 2008-01-12 8:19

>>50
If microsoft asks how many loc you wrote last year, you answer. They're not trying to assert your productivity. Only the number of loc you wrote

Name: Anonymous 2008-01-12 8:30

>>51
``I wrote 0 lines of code, that makes all my program secure, also it makes me a bad programmer according to you. When you'll fire me, people will know you did because none of my programs had a single bug.''

Name: Anonymous 2008-01-12 10:01

>>51
If microsoft asks how many "loc" I wrote last year, I wipe my arse with their fat faces.

Name: Anonymous 2008-01-12 10:22

>>53
That's cute, considering that you're still in your first year of college and never had a job programming anything.

Name: Anonymous 2008-01-12 10:25

>>54
That's cute, considering you're an enterprise faggot and never had a job programming anything.

Name: Anonymous 2008-01-12 10:30

>>55
That's cute, considering you're an EXPERT PROGRAMMER and never had to, oh wait.

Name: Anonymous 2008-01-12 10:33

>>56 is DQN

Name: Anonymous 2008-01-12 11:24

>>54
That's cute, considering I'm an experienced programmer from the dotcom era and you'll be polishing my shoes and calling me "sir" in your first job that does not involve shelves or deepfrying.

Name: Anonymous 2008-01-12 11:50

>>58
considering I'm an experienced programmer from the dotcom era
So you're begging for change in the subway now?

Name: Anonymous 2008-01-12 20:17

>>58
tk u 2da bar|?

Name: Anonymous 2008-01-13 5:43

maybe a 1000. most of it was endless java constructers, alternate constructers, copy constructers, methods, etc. for school

Name: Anonymous 2008-01-13 6:57

I have no interrest in keeping useless and arbitrary statistics like LOC, and I couldn't even begin to guess. I'm doing some maintenance too, so I'd guess I'm removing about half as much code as I'm adding. Pointless metric is pointless.

Name: Anonymous 2008-01-13 7:14

Opps. I'm >>46 I read it as '2008'. In 2007 it would be thousands of lines of code.

>>61
A thousand lines for a whole year?

Name: Anonymous 2008-01-13 7:18

>>63
It's sad how the new generations of students mostly don't seem to code for fun anymore, isn't it?
I blame the cancer of closed source.

Name: Anonymous 2008-01-13 7:30

>>64
I blame Java

Name: Anonymous 2008-01-13 7:37

>>65
yeah, now that languages are actually productive people can do in a few lines what takes hundreds in toy languages like lisp or C

Name: Anonymous 2008-01-13 7:45

>>66
Like what?

Name: Anonymous 2008-01-13 8:05

>>67
Like printing a textfile to standard output:

try {
    File f = new File("filename");
    FileReader fr = new FileReader(f);
    BufferedReader br = new BufferedReader(fr);

    try {
        String s = "";
        while (s = br.readLine()) {
            System.out.println(s);
        }
    } catch (IOException e) { }

} catch (Exception e) {
    System.er.println("Oh noes!");
} finally {
    br.close();
}

So much more concise than this:

FILE *f = fopen("filename");
char line[80];
while(fgets(line, 80, fr) != NULL)
    puts(line);
fclose(f);

Name: Anonymous 2008-01-13 8:07

>>68
Enjoy your slow virtual machine

Name: Anonymous 2008-01-13 8:18

>>68

Wow, that's a real improvement!

Name: Anonymous 2008-01-13 8:39

>>66,68
FILE* f = fopen( "filename" );
char[256] buffer; size_t r = 0;
while ( f && r = fread( buffer, 1, sizeof( buffer ), f )
     fwrite( buffer, 1, r, stdout );
fclose( f );

Looks like my C version is shorter than your toy language.

Name: >>71 2008-01-13 8:40

IHBT. IHL. HAND.

I should start actually reading past the (Post truncated.)

Name: Anonymous 2008-01-13 8:48

In Haskell: putStrLn . (readFile "filename")

Name: Anonymous 2008-01-13 8:58

>>68

cat file.txt

Name: Anonymous 2008-01-13 9:08

<? echo readfile("filename"); ?>

lol PHP :|

Name: Anonymous 2008-01-13 9:13

10, surprisingly enough it was not a good year employment wise

Name: Anonymous 2008-01-13 10:05

>>76
I wouldn't hire a programmer who only writes code on the job.
If he doesn't enjoy programming, he's not going to be any good, and if he did enjoy programming, he'd code in his spare time.

Name: Anonymous 2008-01-13 14:56

putStrLn considered harmful, use putStr instead.

Name: Anonymous 2008-01-13 15:07

>>78
I'm surprised that's all anyone noticed. The `.' used would make a type error. The code should've been:
do contents <- readFile "filename"
      putStr contents

Name: Anonymous 2008-01-13 15:25

>>79
ONE WORD, LACK ON INDENTATION OF THE CODE, THREAD OVER.

Name: Anonymous 2008-01-13 15:26

>>80
TWO WORDS: GRAMMAR.

Name: Anonymous 2008-01-13 15:40

>>81
Oh hot damn, at least I'm not one of these ``your''/``you're'' jerks.

Name: Anonymous 2008-01-13 15:55

>>82
Please be one in the future.

Thank you.

Name: Anonymous 2008-01-13 15:55

>>82
hurt anon is hurt

Name: Anonymous 2008-01-13 16:02

What the jack, ``proper quotes'' in K&R?!

Name: Anonymous 2008-01-13 18:10

>>79 do notation considered harmful

readFile "filename" >>= putStrLn

Name: Anonymous 2008-01-13 18:15

>>86
do notation considered harmful
By whom? Simon Peyton-Jones seems to like it.

Name: Anonymous 2008-01-13 18:37

>>79
I'm surprised that you took my random troll post seriously. I don't even know Haskell.

Name: Anonymous 2008-01-13 19:00

>>88
It was a technically accurate criticism.

Name: Anonymous 2008-01-28 5:19

>>7
Oh really?  I've got to try that out!  See you in a month.

I'm back.  Couldn't last a month without /prog/ ;_;

Name: Anonymous 2009-03-06 10:57

Less fags 4chan coders   are talentless fags   4chan coders are   talentless fags 4chan?

Name: Anonymous 2010-12-17 1:37

This post brought to you by the Gay Nigger Association of America
Don't change these.
Name: Email:
Entire Thread Thread List
All trademarks and copyrights on this site are owned by their respective parties. All comments and posts are the responsibility of their own posters.
- Tinychan + 2ch Mode -