Haskellllllllllll

Fuck your line noise syntax.

gb2TECO

::, [] and -> are not line noise.
#$%$%&%$^&%^&#$%#@%$3059-09 is line noise (valid perl cod)

Why didn't I notice this thread?

Anyways, >>1, please listen to me. Not that it's really related to this thread. I went to /prog a while ago; you know, world4ch? Well anyways there were an insane number of Haskell programmers in there, and I couldn't post. Then, I googled for the Haskell homepage, and it had "PURELY FUNCTIONAL PROGRAMMING LANGUAGE" written on it. Oh, the stupidity. Those idiots. You don't use a programming language just because it s purely functional, fool. It's only referential transparency, FORCED NO SIDE EFFECTS for crying out loud. There're even companies using it. Company of 400 employees, all downloading some Haskell compiler, huh? How fucking nice. Alright, my manager's gonna use Haskell for the whole project. God I can't bear to watch. You people, I'll give you a damn purely functional language for FREE if you stop fagging up my /prog. /prog should be a bloody place. The tense atmosphere, where two guys on opposite sides of an open discussion can start a fight over VIM vs Emacs at any time, the stab-or-be-stabbed mentality, that's what's great about this place. Haskell fags should screw off and stay home. Anyways, I was about to discuss dynamic typing, and then the bastard beside me goes programming, with Haskell. Who in the world uses Haskell, you moron? I want to ask him, do you REALLY want to use Haskell? I want to interrogate him. I want to interrogate him for roughly an hour. Are you sure you don't just want to try saying Haskell? Coming from a expert programmer such as myself, the latest trend among us vets is this, multi-paradigm languages. That's right, multi-paradigm languages. This is the vet's way of programming. Multi-paradigm languages means more functionality than fappage. But on the other hand the theoretical correctness is a tad lower. This is the key. And then, it's powerful. This is unbeatable. However, if you try this then there is danger that you'll be marked by trolls from next time on; it s a double-edged sword. I can't recommend it to amateurs. What this all really means, though, is that you, >>2, should just stick with today's special.

>>4
Anyways, >>1, please listen to me.
you, >>2, should just stick with today's special.

>>5
Yes, the whole point of my post was to give >>2 a good culinary tip. So what ?

>>4
Hmmm... I might have written this variation... it sucks, so may be not.

You know Haskell can do dynamic types, right, in Data.Dynamics?

Haskell is also a multi-paradigm language.

LiFe is a mixture of iron and lithium.*

>>8
>>9
ITT: recent CS graduates have bizarre ideas about how the world really works and yammer endlessly about the merits of "purely functional programming" without having ever brought a single system to production.

XMonad

I feel the need, the need for weed!

Marijuana MUST be legalized.

Noise He got to.