/prog/ - Fav C compiler?

Name: Anonymous 2007-12-23 3:18

What's your favorite C compiler?

Name: Anonymous 2007-12-23 3:33

cl

Name: Anonymous 2007-12-23 4:12

I wrote a K&R compiler in Scheme when I was 11.

Name: Anonymous 2007-12-23 4:19

>>3
I DON'T CARE IF U WROTE A K&R COMPILER IN SCHEME WHEN U WAS 11.
I CARE IF IT IS UR FAVORITE COMPILER OR NOT.

Name: Anonymous 2007-12-23 4:31

>>4
You're clearly not a good programmer. EC (EXPERT C) was written as a single recursive function.

Name: Anonymous 2007-12-23 5:03

gcc

Name: Anonymous 2007-12-23 6:14

gcc

Name: Anonymous 2007-12-23 6:25

gcc

Name: Anonymous 2007-12-23 6:31

gcc

Name: Anonymous 2007-12-23 6:36

EMACS

Name: Anonymous 2007-12-23 7:43

>>6-9
What does the ``g'' stand for in ``gcc''?

Name: Anonymous 2007-12-23 8:05

>>11
GNU.

Name: Anonymous 2007-12-23 8:09

>>12
What does the ``G'' stand for in ``GNU''?

Name: Anonymous 2007-12-23 8:12

>>13
GNU.

Name: Anonymous 2007-12-23 8:13

>>13
GNU, seriously. Please use tail recursion and/or lazy evaluation when evaluating this acronym, to reduce the risk of STACK OVERFLOW.

Name: Anonymous 2007-12-23 8:45

GNU
GNU's Not Unix
(GNU's Not Unix)'s Not Unix
((GNU's Not Unix)'s Not Unix)'s Not Unix
(((GNU's Not Unix)'s Not Unix)'s Not Unix)'s Not Unix
((((GNU's Not Unix)'s Not Unix)'s Not Unix)'s Not Unix)'s Not Unix)'s Not Unix
((((((GNU's Not Unix)'s Not Unix)'s Not Unix)'s Not Unix)'s Not Unix)'s Not Unix)'s Not Unix
(((((((GNU's Not Unix)'s Not Unix)'s Not Unix)'s Not Unix)'s Not Unix)'s Not Unix)'s Not Unix)'s Not Unix
(((((((((GNU's Not Unix)'s Not Unix)'s Not Unix)'s Not Unix)'s Not Unix)'s Not Unix)'s Not Unix)'s Not Unix)'s Not Unix)'s Not Unix
((((((((((GNU's Not Unix)'s Not Unix)'s Not Unix)'s Not Unix)'s Not Unix)'s Not Unix)'s Not Unix)'s Not Unix)'s Not Unix)'s Not Unix)'s Not Unix
(((((((((((GNU's Not Unix)'s Not Unix)'s Not Unix)'s Not Unix)'s Not Unix)'s Not Unix)'s Not Unix)'s Not Unix)'s Not Unix)'s Not Unix)'s Not Unix)'s Not Unix
(((((((((((((GNU's Not Unix)'s Not Unix)'s Not Unix)'s Not Unix)'s Not Unix)'s Not Unix)'s Not Unix)'s Not Unix)'s Not Unix)'s Not Unix)'s Not Unix)'s Not Unix)'s Not Unix)'s Not Unix
((((((((((((((GNU's Not Unix)'s Not Unix)'s Not Unix)'s Not Unix)'s Not Unix)'s Not Unix)'s Not Unix)'s Not Unix)'s Not Unix)'s Not Unix)'s Not Unix)'s Not Unix)'s Not Unix)'s Not Unix)'s Not Unix
(((((((((((((((GNU's Not Unix)'s Not Unix)'s Not Unix)'s Not Unix)'s Not Unix)'s Not Unix)'s Not Unix)'s Not Unix)'s Not Unix)'s Not Unix)'s Not Unix)'s Not Unix)'s Not Unix)'s Not Unix)'s Not Unix)'s Not Unix

FUCK IT KEEPS GOING!!!

Name: Anonymous 2007-12-23 9:04

>>16
i loled

Name: Anonymous 2007-12-23 9:27

>>15
I don't think tail recursion or lazy evaluation would work here unless you read the string backwards.

Name: Anonymous 2007-12-23 9:29

>>18
I don't think you understand the difference between foldrad foldl.

Name: Anonymous 2007-12-23 9:30

I don't think you understand the difference between foldr and foldl.

Name: Anonymous 2007-12-23 11:03

>>19,20
I happen to do just that. foldr applies its passed function to the arguments in ``reverse'' order, so that you can easily join them together with (:) and get the original list. foldl on the other hand, is retarded.

Name: Anonymous 2007-12-23 14:18

gcc, faggots.

Name: Anonymous 2007-12-23 14:19

UNIX cc

Name: Anonymous 2007-12-23 14:20

pcc

Name: Anonymous 2007-12-23 15:03

gcc

Name: Anonymous 2007-12-23 19:48

No love for cl?
:{

Name: Anonymous 2007-12-23 19:56

gcc

Name: Anonymous 2007-12-23 19:59

>>26
no

gcc

Name: Anonymous 2007-12-23 20:21

tcc

Name: Anonymous 2007-12-23 20:57

>>29
Enjoy your non-optimized mickey mouse assembly output and non-standard C.

Name: Anonymous 2007-12-23 21:19

Mircoso

*runs*

Name: Anonymous 2007-12-23 21:23

Borland Turbo C 2.01

Name: Anonymous 2007-12-23 22:28

>>31
See >>2

Name: Anonymous 2007-12-24 1:38

LLVM, bitches.

Name: Anonymous 2007-12-24 4:11

cl AND gcc, bitch

Name: Anonymous 2007-12-24 4:30

gcc

Name: Anonymous 2007-12-24 4:51

>>34
I'm with you.

Too bad clang doesn't generate code, only parses it.

Name: Anonymous 2007-12-24 5:22

>>35
If you're using cl, why would you want to use an inferior compiler?

Name: Anonymous 2007-12-24 5:52

icc

fuck yeah INTEL

Name: Anonymous 2007-12-24 6:19

>>39
I've heard some very good things about the optimizer in the Intel compiler. I think the ranking of quality compilers are:

Intel Compiler
Microsoft's Optimizing C compiler
GNU Compiler Collection coming in the last place (way behind the first two)

Name: Anonymous 2007-12-24 8:07

>>40
The only problem is GHC and sbcl win

Name: Anonymous 2007-12-24 8:33

>>41
problem?

Name: Anonymous 2007-12-24 9:32

>>39
Holy damn, that's expensive. I'm guessing you didn't pay for it yourself.

I'm envious.

Name: Anonymous 2007-12-24 9:39

>>40
gcc doesn't stand for GNU Compiler Collection in this context, but for GNU C Compiler. They're different things.

Name: Anonymous 2007-12-24 14:32

>>42
Sorry. ``problem'' with those choices

Name: Anonymous 2007-12-24 15:09

pcc, 10 seconds to compile it.

Name: Anonymous 2007-12-24 17:11

>>44
That was a typo, I meant GNU C Compiler.

Name: Anonymous 2007-12-24 17:23

When I use an editor, I don't want eight extra KILOBYTES of worthless
help screens and cursor positioning code! I just want an EDitor!!
Not a "viitor". Not a "emacsitor". Those aren't even WORDS!!!!
ED! ED! ED IS THE STANDARD!!!

Name: Anonymous 2007-12-24 18:04

>>43
Who pays for software? LOL

Anyway, it's free for non-commercial use.

Name: Anonymous 2007-12-24 18:34

g++

Name: Anonymous 2007-12-24 22:50

>>50
lolretard

Name: Anonymous 2007-12-25 4:36

>>49 uses Linux

Name: Anonymous 2007-12-25 7:55

>>50
C you fag.

Name: Anonymous 2007-12-25 8:44

tendra.
http://www.tendra.org/about/

Name: Anonymous 2009-03-18 3:05

Don't call me gay, but I need some mary jay!

Marijuana MUST be legalized.

Name: Anonymous 2010-11-15 9:56

Name: Anonymous 2011-02-03 7:38

Name: Anonymous 2013-01-19 20:58

/prog/ will be spammed continuously until further notice. we apologize for any inconvenience this may cause.

Fav C compiler?

1 Name: Anonymous 2007-12-23 3:18

2 Name: Anonymous 2007-12-23 3:33

3 Name: Anonymous 2007-12-23 4:12

4 Name: Anonymous 2007-12-23 4:19

5 Name: Anonymous 2007-12-23 4:31

6 Name: Anonymous 2007-12-23 5:03

7 Name: Anonymous 2007-12-23 6:14

8 Name: Anonymous 2007-12-23 6:25

9 Name: Anonymous 2007-12-23 6:31

10 Name: Anonymous 2007-12-23 6:36

11 Name: Anonymous 2007-12-23 7:43

12 Name: Anonymous 2007-12-23 8:05

13 Name: Anonymous 2007-12-23 8:09

14 Name: Anonymous 2007-12-23 8:12

15 Name: Anonymous 2007-12-23 8:13

16 Name: Anonymous 2007-12-23 8:45

17 Name: Anonymous 2007-12-23 9:04

18 Name: Anonymous 2007-12-23 9:27

19 Name: Anonymous 2007-12-23 9:29

20 Name: Anonymous 2007-12-23 9:30

21 Name: Anonymous 2007-12-23 11:03

22 Name: Anonymous 2007-12-23 14:18

23 Name: Anonymous 2007-12-23 14:19

24 Name: Anonymous 2007-12-23 14:20

25 Name: Anonymous 2007-12-23 15:03

26 Name: Anonymous 2007-12-23 19:48

27 Name: Anonymous 2007-12-23 19:56

28 Name: Anonymous 2007-12-23 19:59

29 Name: Anonymous 2007-12-23 20:21

30 Name: Anonymous 2007-12-23 20:57

31 Name: Anonymous 2007-12-23 21:19

32 Name: Anonymous 2007-12-23 21:23

33 Name: Anonymous 2007-12-23 22:28

34 Name: Anonymous 2007-12-24 1:38

35 Name: Anonymous 2007-12-24 4:11

36 Name: Anonymous 2007-12-24 4:30

37 Name: Anonymous 2007-12-24 4:51

38 Name: Anonymous 2007-12-24 5:22

39 Name: Anonymous 2007-12-24 5:52

40 Name: Anonymous 2007-12-24 6:19

41 Name: Anonymous 2007-12-24 8:07

42 Name: Anonymous 2007-12-24 8:33

43 Name: Anonymous 2007-12-24 9:32

44 Name: Anonymous 2007-12-24 9:39

45 Name: Anonymous 2007-12-24 14:32

46 Name: Anonymous 2007-12-24 15:09

47 Name: Anonymous 2007-12-24 17:11

48 Name: Anonymous 2007-12-24 17:23

49 Name: Anonymous 2007-12-24 18:04

50 Name: Anonymous 2007-12-24 18:34

51 Name: Anonymous 2007-12-24 22:50

52 Name: Anonymous 2007-12-25 4:36

53 Name: Anonymous 2007-12-25 7:55

54 Name: Anonymous 2007-12-25 8:44

55 Name: Anonymous 2009-03-18 3:05

56 Name: Anonymous 2010-11-15 9:56

57 Name: Anonymous 2011-02-03 7:38

58 Name: Anonymous 2013-01-19 20:58