is there anyway to convert a tripcode into the password for that tripcode, im using tripsage and I see that you can put in a word you want to see in a trip code and it produces results of passwords that would produce a tripcode with those letters in it, so if we were to take a complete tripcode someone has and enter it into that field, in theory it should eventually produce the 1 password that produces that tripcode, however i have a core 2 duo e6600 which can run 170,000 crypts per second but with over 10^80 possible combinations(numbers + letters + capital letters + symbols, and 10 characters in a tripcode) it would take litteraly much more than trillions of years to run through every combination. Any other suggestions?
>>603
The twenty or so posts that are actually about tripcodes are pretty interesting, though.
This thread had potential. It's sad people must step on every dream.
-- Generate the salt
salt :: String -> String
salt t =
map f . take 2 . tail $ t ++ "H.."
where
f c
| c `notElem` ['.'..'z'] = '.'
| c `elem` [':'..'@'] = chr $ ord c + 7
| c `elem` ['['..'`'] = chr $ ord c + 6
| otherwise = c
-- The actual tripcode
tripcode :: String -> String
tripcode tr = unsafePerformIO $ do
trip <- newCString tr
salt <- newCString $ salt tr
trip <- peekCString $ crypt trip salt
return . drop (length trip - 10) $ trip
showTrip :: IO (Bool,(String,String)) -> IO ()
showTrip t = do
(b,(s,t)) <- t
if b then putStrLn $ s ++ " -> " ++ t else return ()
tripTuple :: IO String -> IO (String, String)
tripTuple s = do
s <- s
return (s,tripcode s)
matchTrip :: String -> IO (String,String) -> IO (Bool,(String,String))
matchTrip r t = do
(s,t) <- t
return (t =~ r,(s,t))
main :: IO ()
main = do
args <- getArgs
f args
where
f [] = do
mapM_ (showTrip . matchTrip "." . tripTuple . makeString) $ repeat (' ','~')
f args = do
mapM_ (showTrip . (matchTrip $ head args) . tripTuple . makeString) $ repeat (' ','~')
>>609
There are a million fast tripcrackers in C out there already. Once you get past bitslicing, there are no real challenges left in C and the rest is just busywork.
>>611
so get to bitslicing in haskell already instead of just calling c code from haskell.
Name:
Anonymous2009-04-07 19:37
>>612
What have you done recently, dipshit? Or are you just here to leech off other people's work so you can impress your middle school friends with your omgawsum novelty tripcode?