Return Styles: Pseud0ch, Terminal, Valhalla, NES, Geocities, Blue Moon.

Pages: 1-

haskell or lisp

Name: Anonymous 2007-11-20 12:56

haskell or lisp?

Name: Anonymous 2007-11-20 13:01

If you have to ask you'll never know.

Name: Anonymous 2007-11-20 13:01

Haskell and lisp

Name: Anonymous 2007-11-20 13:03

Haskell and Lisp together are almost as useful as C.

Name: Anonymous 2007-11-20 13:41

Why haskell over say, smalltalk?

Name: Anonymous 2007-11-20 13:47

Implement Lisp in Haskell.

Name: Anonymous 2007-11-20 17:53

>>6
and then implement Haskell in your lisp implementation.

Name: Anonymous 2007-11-20 17:57

>>5
Smalltalk has insufficient levels of abstract bullshite.

Name: Anonymous 2007-11-20 20:02

Erlang > Lisp > Haskell.

Name: Anonymous 2007-11-20 20:40

>>7
Then implement pascal in your haskell implementation written in the lisp implementation written in haskell/

Name: Anonymous 2007-11-21 3:59

why the xor decision? why not and?

Name: Anonymous 2007-11-21 5:18

>>11
Because THERE CAN BE ONLY ONE

Name: Anonymous 2007-11-21 6:16

Liskell

Name: Anonymous 2007-11-21 6:41

Guys, we've got an Erlangfag among us!

Though I don't find any reason to bash Erlang. I don't know Erlang myself, but everything I've heard from it is good.

Name: Anonymous 2007-11-21 6:42

>>11
Why not and or and or or?

Name: Anonymous 2007-11-21 10:47

Because or and not or is not or or and

Name: Anonymous 2007-11-21 12:53

To or and not or not to or or and

Name: Anonymous 2007-11-21 13:12

ITT: De Morgan's law.

Name: Anonymous 2007-11-21 14:00

>>14
I've heard Erlang's syntax is abysmal.

Name: Anonymous 2007-11-21 14:35

With Erlang, the (fun -> end)s!

Name: Anonymous 2007-11-21 18:45

>>19
that's hearsay if you haven't experienced it.

Name: Anonymous 2007-11-21 18:53

>>4
True. Also, Haskell is for wannabe mathfags.

Name: Anonymous 2007-11-21 20:27

>>18

I lol'd heartily

Name: Anonymous 2007-11-21 20:30

>>19
That's just from Lispers whose only punctuation is ()[spoiler])[spoiler])[spoiler])[spoiler])[spoiler])[spoiler])[spoiler])[spoiler])[spoiler])[/spoiler][/spoiler][/spoiler][/spoiler][/spoiler][/spoiler][/spoiler][/spoiler][/spoiler].  Erlang has as much , ; -> . as any other language.

Name: Anonymous 2007-11-21 20:31

>>24
ah, fuck.

Name: Anonymous 2007-11-21 22:20

>>24
(((ok bitch)
  (you asked for it)
  (here goes))
 (im taking out the fucking
     (bold paranthesis on you))
 (you fuqing angered an expert programmer)
 (ive been here for (expt 3 88888000) years longer than you)
 (ive read sicp twice)
 (i know every programming language in the world
    including apl)
 (if u wanna batl (lets do it))
 (ill crush you like a bean))

Name: Anonymous 2011-11-10 11:30

old thread is old

Name: Anonymous 2013-01-19 23:38

/prog/ will be spammed continuously until further notice. we apologize for any inconvenience this may cause.

Don't change these.
Name: Email:
Entire Thread Thread List