Return Styles: Pseud0ch, Terminal, Valhalla, NES, Geocities, Blue Moon.

Pages: 1-

android

Name: Anonymous 2007-11-19 0:36

what are /prog/'s thoughts on android os?

Name: Anonymous 2007-11-19 1:16



Name: Anonymous 2007-11-19 2:01

/prog/ doesn't think, that's why they use lisp

Name: Anonymous 2007-11-19 10:32

WTF is that? Anything to do with Lisp, Python or any "ABSTRACT BULLSHITE"? Else I don't care.

Name: Anonymous 2007-11-19 10:37

at least anon isn't talking about PLT/MIT scheme... oh how I dread the thought of 6.001

And >>3 is right, /prog/ don't think, /prog/ processes.

Name: Anonymous 2007-11-19 12:28

I like it.

Beside the fact that most of it is written in ENTERPRISE JAVA, I like it.

Name: Anonymous 2007-11-19 12:30

>>6
For example: http://code.google.com/android/images/hello_world_8.png

Name: Anonymous 2007-11-19 12:35

I haven't paid much attention to it, but am I correct if when I assume that it is a completely useless Java cellphone platform supported by zero real-world devices and hyped very highly only because Google made it?

Name: Anonymous 2007-11-19 12:38

Dunno. It might be that Google was the party that finally made something that wasn't completely useless. For a cell phone I mean.

Name: Anonymous 2007-11-19 12:47

>>9
But the fact that it doesn't actually support, like, any actual cell phones should render it appropriately useless.

Name: Anonymous 2007-11-19 13:20

>>10
Yeah. Generally, with free operating systems, you do not need to a build or buy a brand new computer to install and run it on.

Name: Anonymous 2007-11-19 14:53

>>10
Indeed. And there's still the very real poss^Wprobability of cell operator AIDS.

Name: Anonymous 2007-11-20 8:27

What?
Google doing this kind of Java enterprise shit?
Fucking MBAs GTFO my Google
Google sucks now
Fucking morons

Name: Anonymous 2007-11-21 7:20

>>13
Time to face reality, haskellFag.

Name: Anonymous 2007-11-21 7:41

FUCKING FAGGOT SHIT CUNT NIGGERS PISS

Name: Anonymous 2007-11-21 9:19

>>14
I'm not haskellFag, I'm PythonFag.

Name: Anonymous 2007-11-21 10:12

>>16
__python_fag__

Name: Anonymous 2007-11-21 14:36

>>16
for i in UsePython(YES): whine()

Name: Anonymous 2007-11-21 14:38

i.whine(), that's right.

Name: Anonymous 2007-11-21 18:10

>>19
yes->You(do)

Name: Anonymous 2009-09-17 15:26

Lain.

Name: Anonymous 2009-09-17 15:28

Lain.

Name: Anonymous 2009-09-17 15:28

Lain.

Name: Anonymous 2009-09-17 15:29

Lain.

Name: Anonymous 2009-09-17 15:29

Lain.

Name: Anonymous 2009-09-17 15:30

Lain.

Name: Anonymous 2009-09-17 15:30

Lain.

Name: Anonymous 2010-11-13 10:39

Name: Anonymous 2010-11-15 8:13

Name: Anonymous 2010-11-28 4:55

Name: Anonymous 2011-02-04 19:01

Name: Anonymous 2011-02-18 14:08

<-- that's cool and all, but check my doubles over there

Name: 10 2012-12-29 15:11

>>10
I just remembered making a snide remark about Android's future prospects on /prog/ while it was still good I still used it, and sure enough, there it is. It's beginning to look like I was wrong for once.

Name: >>8 2012-12-29 15:12

Oops, meant >>8, though I think >>10 was me, too.

Name: Anonymous 2012-12-29 16:10

I wish /prog/ was still good.

Name: Anonymous 2012-12-29 16:28

>>34,35
while it was still good I still used it
You used Android in 2007? Pretty sure the G1 didn't come out till 2008.

Name: Anonymous 2012-12-29 17:03

>>37
3/10

Name: PROGS AVENGER 2012-12-29 17:21

I WILL SMITE THEE

Name: Anonymous 2012-12-29 17:28

>>8
8 Name: Anonymous : 2007-11-19 12:35
I haven't paid much attention to it, but am I correct if when I assume that it is a completely useless Java cellphone platform supported by zero real-world devices and hyped very highly only because Google made it?
Don't change these.
Name: Email:
Entire Thread Thread List
All trademarks and copyrights on this site are owned by their respective parties. All comments and posts are the responsibility of their own posters.
- Tinychan + 2ch Mode -