-fwarn-tabs
Name:
Anonymous
2007-11-12 14:35
GHC 6.8.1 is out, bitches!
Name:
Anonymous
2007-11-12 14:59
You're slow, it's been out for nine days.
Name:
Anonymous
2007-11-12 15:05
┌───────┐
│HASKELL│
└───────┘
::
╒════════════╕
│nobody cares│
╘════════════╛
Name:
Anonymous
2007-11-12 15:06
I care. :(
Name:
Anonymous
2007-11-12 15:08
┌───┐
│>>4│
└───┘
::
╒════════════╕
│nobody cares│
╘════════════╛
Name:
Anonymous
2007-11-12 15:09
>>4
Will you be my Haskell friend?
Name:
Anonymous
2007-11-12 16:54
Name:
Anonymous
2007-11-12 18:49
I care about Haskell. My code looks so much better using it.
Name:
Anonymous
2007-11-13 8:20
Name:
Anonymous
2007-11-13 8:23
There is no such thing as good-looking Haskell code.
Name:
Anonymous
2007-11-13 8:43
There is no such thing as good-looking Perl code.
Name:
Anonymous
2007-11-13 9:32
>>10-11
This mans speak the truth
Name:
Anonymous
2007-11-13 10:01
There is no such thing as good-looking Lisp code.
Name:
Anonymous
2007-11-13 10:02
>>13
Took you long enough.
Name:
Anonymous
2007-11-13 10:12
>>14
Why do you have three spaces after long?
Name:
Anonymous
2007-11-13 10:15
>>15
LONGSPACE IS LOOOOOOOOOOOONG
Name:
Anonymous
2007-11-13 10:24
>>13
yes there is, you are looking with the wrong eyes
Name:
Anonymous
2007-11-13 10:34
>>15
Why does Mr. Satori always terminate the last sentence in his post with a period in /
[code] tags?
Name:
Anonymous
2007-11-13 10:35
hurrr rrruh
Name:
Anonymous
2007-11-13 10:41
>>18
It's his little secret
Name:
Anonymous
2007-11-13 10:52
There is no such thing as bad-looking Python code.
Name:
Anonymous
2007-11-13 11:15
Name:
Anonymous
2007-11-13 11:19
Name:
Anonymous
2007-11-13 11:44
Name:
Anonymous
2007-11-13 11:46
""" blah blah blah """
Name:
Anonymous
2007-11-13 12:01
FUCK YEAH
10-15% PERFORMANCE IMPROVEMENTS
OVERLOADED STRINGS
-X AND -XNo FLAGS
INTERACTIVE DEBUGGER
I installed 6.8.1 and the new Cabal broke a lot of packages. And the older Cabal won't compile. :(
Name:
Anonymous
2007-11-13 12:08
imLearningHaskellButIAlreadyHateTheCamelCase :(
Name:
Anonymous
2007-11-13 13:33
>>27
iHateThatBecauseIts shitCase, ThoughILike CamelCase.
Name:
Anonymous
2007-11-13 14:25
hey-guys-at-lisp-we-can-do-it-without-any-modifier-keys
Name:
Anonymous
2007-11-13 14:52
>>29
dude-have-you-got-a-spare-parenthesi-i-ran-out
Name:
Anonymous
2007-11-13 15:56
compiling like 500 lines of haskell on my crappy ass laptop actually overheats it and makes it shut down, at least i can still compile c
yes i know i need a new computer but my point is valid, ghc needs to be re-written or replaced and there are better ways of compiling haskell
i'm afraid i don't know what they are but i have a friend who is a fucking math genius and he claims there are, SO THERE!
Name:
Anonymous
2007-11-13 16:06
>>31
I compile Haskell in my head. As Haskell can't do anything with side-effects anyway, I don't have to compute any results.
Laziness for the win.
Name:
Anonymous
2007-11-13 16:10
>>31
can your crappy ass laptop compile the amount of C code it takes to get equivalent functionality as the haskell application?
Name:
Anonymous
2007-11-13 16:11
>>33
int main(int argc, char* argv[]) {
return 0;
}
Sure, really fast as well.
Name:
2010-09-08 17:33