SICP is not about computers. Or science...

Lecture 1A.
I'd like to welcome you all to this course on computer science.  Actually, that's a terrible way to start; erh, computer science is a terrible name for this business. First of all, it's not a science. It erh, might be engineering or it might be art.  We'll actually see that computer so-called science actually has a lot in common with magic.  We'll see that in this course.  So it's not a science. It's also not really very much about computers, and it's not about computers in the same sense that, that physics is not really about particle accelerators. And erh, biology's not really about microscopes and petri dishes. And erh, it's not about computers in the same sense that geometry is not really about erh using surveying instruments.

FILTHY ANTICUDDER LIES!!

SICP Isn't Computer Programming

>>3
RMS? In my thread? It's more likely than you think.

programming != computer science != software engineering

>>5
programming <> computerScience <> softwareEngineering

>>6

programming <=> computer_science <=> software_engineering

>>7
(not (eq programming computer-science software-engineering))
))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))

>>8
((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((LISP))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))

>>9
cool

((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((LISP))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))

In Python I only need to '[spoiler]('*30+'LISP'+30*')[/spoiler]' to get this string, but how do I do it in SCheme?1?

>>5-7
programming ≠ computer science ≠ software engineering

>>9
I can't stop myself as using that as a faux VU meter.

>>13
Damn you, now I'm doing it do.

Someone write a player plugin, I command it.

>>13
>>14
Fuck you guys.

>>15
Fuck you too.

Learn the ways of   telling if a   function has no   chance of getting   a serious answer   I did this   get here I   had found the   truth to hax   your anus with   my efficient numerical?