I hate Lisp!

Ok, all you lisp, scheme and co guys. I hate lisp and languages of that family!

I think functional programing is leet but tell me why it should be (+ 3 4) and not i = 3 + 4? And why (sqrt 3) and not sqrt(3), come on that syntax is a couple of hundred years old, we are used to it...

NO EXCEPTIONS

To spite the infix notation programmers.

>>3
Taint onion fix.

>>1

HAHAHAHA
YOU THINK YOURE THOUGH UH ?
I HAVE ONE WORD FOR YOU
THE FORCED INDENTATION OF THE CODE
GET IT ?
I DONT THINK SO
YOU DONT KNOW ABOUT MY OTHER CAR I GUESS ?
ITS A CDR
YOU PRONOUNCE IT CUDDER
OK YOU FUQIN ANGERED AN EXPERT PROGRAMMER
THIS IS /PROG/
YOU ARE ALLOWED TO POST HERE ONLY IF YOU HAVE ACHIEVED SATORI
PROGRAMMING IS ALL ABOUT ``ABSTRACT BULLSHITE" THAT YOU WILL NEVER COMPREHEND
I HAVE READ SICP
IF ITS NOT DONE YOU HAVE TO
TOO BAD RUBY ON RAIL IS SLOW AS FUCK
BBCODE AND SCHEME ARE THE ULTIMATE LANGUAGES
``THIS IS THE PROPER WAY TO QUOTE"
ALSO
WELCOME TO /PROG/
EVERY THREAD WILL BE REPLIED TO
NO EXCEPTION

>>5
no.

>>1
1) Creating a temporary variable, i, is stupid.
2) Most functional programming languages do use infix notation. Lisp is not FP.

>>1
read SICP, it will all become clear.

Joking OP aside, Lisp is to programming as Latin is to languages, except Latin actually has some uses, unlike the theory circlejerk language that is Lisp.

ITT obvious trolls

Don't change these.

Name:		Email:
Entire Thread Thread List