Return Styles: Pseud0ch, Terminal, Valhalla, NES, Geocities, Blue Moon. Entire thread

STFU JAVA HATERS

Name: Anonymous 2007-09-25 23:11 ID:G7ZVQQu6

LOOK YOU FUCKERS.

IF YOU HATE JAVA SO MUCH, WHY DON'T YOU WRITE A BETTER COMPILER THAT OUTPUTS STANDARD JAVA BYTES AND SHUT THE FUCK UP.

THANK YOU.

Name: Anonymous 2007-09-25 23:16 ID:cKvjJIjn

Java sucks and so do you. Take out a gun and get it over with.

Name: Anonymous 2007-09-25 23:17 ID:filbfKy+

>>1
Mmm, java bytes. Those are the chocolate covered coffee beans they sell at Starbucks, right?

Name: Anonymous 2007-09-25 23:52 ID:5UtGcVj/

>>1 You can take solace that Java isn't Visual Basic.

That's all you have.

Name: Anonymous 2007-09-25 23:55 ID:lj7OBnGV

Great, you managed to ruin /prog/

Name: Anonymous 2007-09-26 0:21 ID:Heaven

>>1
It's Java and javamonkeys that suck.

Name: Anonymous 2007-09-26 0:40 ID:+tm18PUN

#include <stdio.h>
int main() { return puts("STANDARD JAVA BYTES"); }

Name: Anonymous 2007-09-26 1:06 ID:Heaven

ONE WORD, JYTHON, THREAD OVER.

Name: fags 2007-09-26 1:28 ID:I4cuYAeF

YHBT
YHL

Name: Anonymous 2007-09-26 3:24 ID:MyB6aCCu

Java is not for enterprise programmers. It's for the intellectually impaired.

Name: Anonymous 2007-09-26 3:27 ID:pIljYhRr

>>10

Same thing

Name: Anonymous 2007-09-26 5:39 ID:VJffH0to


cout << "STANDARD JAVA BYTES AND SHUT THE FUCK UP.\n\nTHANK YOU.";

Name: Anonymous 2007-09-26 18:19 ID:MyB6aCCu

Requiring less running time is:

fprintf(stdout, "STANDARD JAVA BYTES AND SHUT THE FUCK UP.\n\nTHANK YOU.");

Name: Anonymous 2007-09-26 18:22 ID:md8y2U6Y

JYTHON?

ONE WORD. FORCED INDENTATION OF ENTERPRISE QUALITY CODE.

Name: Anonymous 2007-09-26 18:23 ID:Heaven

>>1

Since we hate java, WHY THE HELL WOULD WE MAKE A COMPILER FOR IT!

Name: Anonymous 2007-09-26 18:30 ID:Heaven

>>14

Learn how to sage

Name: Anonymous 2007-09-26 18:53 ID:t4f0zZ3M

>>14
Java + Jython + Zope

The ultimate enterprise

Name: Anonymous 2007-09-26 18:57 ID:2VDRn6JJ

>>17
AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII

Name: Anonymous 2007-09-26 19:00 ID:t4f0zZ3M

>>17
Using JavaFX and XML for configuration, and all built into an EJB and ran in a J2EE application server.

Name: Link48010 2007-09-26 19:05 ID:ntUyTCUs

What is your issue with Java. It's a damn language. It isn't all that easy to code, but it's better than say HTML if you ask me.

Name: Anonymous 2007-09-26 19:11 ID:n390Hx4z

>>20
What is your issue with granny smiths? They're damn apples. They aren't all that big, but they're better than, say, oranges if you ask me.

Java:
Prolix
ZOMG OBJECTS *FAPFAPFAP*
No features that make it better than other languages.

Name: Anonymous 2007-09-26 19:13 ID:Heaven

Everybody knows JAVA is made of AIDS and FAIL

now stfu and get the fuck out of here

Name: Anonymous 2007-09-26 19:18 ID:Heaven

gtfo

Name: Anonymous 2007-09-27 1:55 ID:QCexqUnC

How about we write a compiler that outputs standard MACHINE CODE, not shitty psuedo-code. GTFO.

Name: Anonymous 2007-09-27 1:59 ID:2RBQcDxB

>>24
Do any modern JVMs not build machine code?

Name: Anonymous 2007-09-27 2:23 ID:wt+bTbcV

I'm curious why JVMs don't save the results of their JIT runs, especially for long-running processes. Why redo everything from scratch? It's unlikely the program behaviour will be substantially different next time.

Name: Anonymous 2007-09-27 3:17 ID:qDjlv12Y

>>26
Because it won't matter especially for long-running processes.

Name: Anonymous 2007-09-27 3:24 ID:Heaven

>>27
it'd probably help for applets running in a web browser.

Name: Anonymous 2007-09-27 5:34 ID:bJafii6e

>>20
Lol.

Well, my issues are that it sucks as a language for a number of reasons, and comes with an obnoxious, bloated, ENTERPRISE, unpractical standard library that's even worse than the language itself. It can't be compared to HTML because it doesn't even fall in the same category. It has to be compared with other T(o)uring-complete general-purpose programming languages such as Python, Smalltalk, Lua, Lisp, Ruby, Erlang, Haskell, etc., and it compares very unfavourably against any of these I've mentioned. If being among the bottom 3 in a list of the 15 most popular programming languages is not enough of a reason to bash it, then explain me what would be.

Name: Anonymous 2007-09-27 5:34 ID:bJafii6e

It would. Even Microshaft, if I'm not mistaken, caches .NET shit.

Name: Anonymous 2007-09-27 6:08 ID:2RBQcDxB

>>29
Java does fail quickly, but the standard library is one of the nicest things about it.  Especially the byte/character streaming concepts are incredibly useful, as are the many plugin architectures.

Name: Anonymous 2007-09-27 7:24 ID:uOC762Dv

Any program that needs an outside interpreter fails. Enough said.

Name: Anonymous 2007-09-27 7:42 ID:Heaven

>>32
bbcode :(

Name: Anonymous 2007-09-27 9:41 ID:bJafii6e

>>32
Hello Cfag, how are you doing? BTW, I herd *(a + b) is faster than a[b] OMGWTFBBQ!!!!111 YOU MAY SAVE ONE WHOLE CPU CYCLE! Worth dying for! Lies

Name: Anonymous 2007-09-27 11:29 ID:Heaven

>>34
a[b] is O(1)

Name: Anonymous 2007-09-27 14:23 ID:jP2LmQJb

>>35
You're stupid

Name: Anonymous 2007-09-27 14:57 ID:I1u9ugcm

>>33
Contrary to popular belief, BBcode is compiled into native HTML code on the server. You don't need to install a BBcode interpreter to view /prog/ -- or for that matter, even to post.

Name: Anonymous 2007-09-27 15:19 ID:Heaven

:o

Name: Anonymous 2007-09-27 16:18 ID:yrQBjpOF

>>20

You don't know how hard I laughed about that.

>>29
Lua and Python are scripting languages. Just pointing that out.

Name: Anonymous 2007-09-27 16:21 ID:jP2LmQJb

>>39
Lua and Python are scripting languages. Just pointing that out.
Trol les
Newer Posts
Don't change these.
Name: Email:
Entire Thread Thread List
All trademarks and copyrights on this site are owned by their respective parties. All comments and posts are the responsibility of their own posters.
- Tinychan + 2ch Mode -