tripcode cracker in lisp

tripcode crackers are pretty easy to write. perhaps all you smug lisp weenies could demonstrate how lisp's superiority by writing a tripcode cracker that can do better than the ~400kcps 4brute-johnbs does on my computer?

>>40
Did you mean: C++



Works Cited
http://shootout.alioth.debian.org

>>41
We've discussed why the shootout isn't a good metric dozens of times before, but lets suppose that C++ is consistently faster than C. You would think that embedded programmers would have caught onto that wouldn't you? But guess what, C++ was behind straight assembly in popularity until only a few years ago and C still dominates.

>>40
I DID NOT INTEND TO IMPLY THAT C IS NOT GOOD PERIOD RATHER COMMA I WAS DISAGREEING WITH THE FINAL STATEMENT OF RIGHT ANGLE BRACKET RIGHT ANGLE BRACKET THIRTY EIGHT COLON QUOTE IT'S A SHAME COMMA REALLY COMMA BUT IT'S NOT CHANGING ANY TIME SOON PERIOD UNQUOTE IN OTHER WORDS COMMA I THINK THAT IT MIGHT CHANGE SOON AFTER ALL ELLIPSIS

>>42
You would think that embedded programmers would have caught onto that wouldn't you?
Did you know that the average age of an embedded programmer (in US) is 43 years? Not exactly the people who you would expect to chase for the new shiny technologies, eh? Some of them have not caught on C yet.

>>44
I have a buddy, not sure but he's like 25, Gnome dev and working for Intel with some embedded stuff. Not so 43, eh?

>>45
Who the fuck uses Gnome on embedded systems?

>>45
He said average age.
>>46
These days, "embedded" just means it has a funny keyboard or something.

>>46
Notice and. And. Is Gnome somewhat Intel-related?

>>47
Yeah, I know. Just made me wonder what's this upper border.

50 Name: Anonymous 2010-12-21 16:52

>>49
Hey, no secret poastings!