tripcode cracker in lisp

tripcode crackers are pretty easy to write. perhaps all you smug lisp weenies could demonstrate how lisp's superiority by writing a tripcode cracker that can do better than the ~400kcps 4brute-johnbs does on my computer?

>>41
We've discussed why the shootout isn't a good metric dozens of times before, but lets suppose that C++ is consistently faster than C. You would think that embedded programmers would have caught onto that wouldn't you? But guess what, C++ was behind straight assembly in popularity until only a few years ago and C still dominates.