Return Styles: Pseud0ch, Terminal, Valhalla, NES, Geocities, Blue Moon. Entire thread

Our dark secrets

Name: Anonymous 2007-09-22 14:10 ID:JEvVfMzA

I always use [code] tags on the period at the end of the sentence.

Name: Anonymous 2008-11-08 22:27

>>40
I think you're a faggot.

Name: Anonymous 2009-02-21 22:40

>>81

RO RLY?

Name: Anonymous 2009-02-21 23:42

>>1
I do that sometimes.

Name: Anonymous 2009-02-22 1:53

>>83
Me too.
Congratulations on starting a fresh thread.

Name: Anonymous 2009-02-22 8:07

i still program in c because i think it makes me rebellious and cool.

Name: Anonymous 2009-02-22 8:16

i still program in C because almost all modern operating systems are written >%75 in C

Name: Anonymous 2009-02-22 22:24

I still program in C because I cling to to my optimized ego and have not achieved satori

Name: Anonymous 2009-02-22 23:33

>>86
modern operating systems written in C: Minix, HelenOS
modern operating systems not written in C: Inferno, JX, JNode, Singularity, SharpOS

Name: Anonymous 2009-02-22 23:48

>>88
modern operating systems written in C: Minix, HelenOS, ANONIX
fixed that for you

Name: Anonymous 2009-02-22 23:51

>>89
ANONIX doesn't have a kernel, just like GNU. not a real operating system.

Name: Anonymous 2009-02-22 23:59

>>88
There is no sense in which JNode, JX, Singularity, or SharpOS are ``modern operating systems''.

Name: Anonymous 2009-02-22 23:59

>>90
                  YHBT                 

Name: Anonymous 2009-02-23 1:12

>>91
MICROKERNELS

Name: Anonymous 2009-02-23 5:08

Name: Anonymous 2009-02-23 5:30

>>94
>>90 was just trolling/ignorant/whatever. Hurd works for certain values of work.

Name: Anonymous 2009-02-23 6:27

>>95
Not being stable and fast enough (yet), makes Hurd unsuitable for use in production systems. This is mainly the reason why there are very limited distributions that use Hurd as their kernel (actually there are only two, the Bee GNU/Hurd and the Debian GNU/Hurd).

Name: Anonymous 2009-02-23 6:31

for certain values of work

I use Hurd today as a research system. Mach is slow as fuck. My normal system is FreeBSD.

Name: Anonymous 2009-02-23 6:53

MINIX 3 > L4Linux > * > Hurd

Name: Anonymous 2009-02-23 13:31

>>98
FreeBSD is so far to the left of that equation you need not even mention it.

Name: Anonymous 2009-02-23 14:51

>>99
freebsd is great for an operating system that started in 1969. hopefully soon some free microkernel (or hybrid kernel) OS will replace it, otherwise competing with windows and OS X (both use hybrid kernels) in the server market is going to become increasingly more difficult. i doubt apple is going to open up darwin enough to actually make it useable, and minix has a long way to go before it'd be a viable replacement for freebsd for a lot of people...

Name: Anonymous 2009-02-23 15:00

>>100
OS X
server market
ಠ_ಠ

Name: Anonymous 2009-02-23 15:22

>>100
Hybrid kernels are only useful for closed-source bullshit where you're forced into that paradigm. There's nothing wrong with a monolithic kernel from a development perspective -- you can load and unload drivers in FreeBSD in the same manner that you do in Windows or OSX.

I've done driver development in both FreeBSD and Windows XP: writing FreeBSD kernel modules is just like writing normal code; writing XP kernel drivers is like writing normal NULL, NULL, NULL, NULL, NULL, NULL code, except with a shitty convoluted toolchain and a coconut up your ass.

Name: Anonymous 2009-02-23 15:27

i use boot camp because I get the stability of Windows with the value-of-money of Apple hardware.

Name: Anonymous 2009-02-23 15:33

>>103
Oh Snap!

Name: Anonymous 2009-02-23 15:50

FreeBSD > *

한국 > 일본

Name: Anonymous 2009-02-23 16:02

>>105
日本は一番です。

Name: Anonymous 2009-02-23 16:07

>>103
I mean what

Name: Anonymous 2009-02-23 16:10

>>106
한국이 최고 예요!
더러운 강아지 일본어

Name: Anonymous 2009-02-23 16:11

Name: Anonymous 2009-02-23 16:30

>>109
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/DragonFly_BSD
Back to your pipe dreams, Matt.

Name: Anonymous 2009-02-24 5:14

>>102
Can you develop drivers for hardware without open specs?

Name: Anonymous 2009-02-24 5:24

>>111
It's possible but far too annoying IMO. If I was to do that, I'd disassemble the existing binary in order to write specs for someone else to implement.

Name: Anonymous 2009-02-24 5:25

I haven't read my SICP today.

Name: Anonymous 2009-02-24 8:57

>>113
Get out.

Name: Anonymous 2009-02-24 10:38

>>113
I see what you did not do there.

Name: Anonymous 2009-02-24 11:47

I wrote 4chan.js

Name: Anonymous 2009-02-24 11:51

>>116
This may surprise you, but actually it was I who wrote 4chan.js

Name: Anonymous 2009-02-24 11:52

I AM 4chan.js!

Name: Anonymous 2009-02-24 12:05

4chan.js is written in Scheme

Name: Anonymous 2009-02-24 12:06

>>118
I am the picture file which contains 4chan.js.

Newer Posts
Don't change these.
Name: Email:
Entire Thread Thread List