>>8
How come everyone is so butthurt at our Lispy smugness lately? I'm seeing a lot more impotent rage directed my way this week.
Name:
Anonymous2007-09-13 6:04 ID:CDNcYa4D
>>9
They're clearly jealous of our suaveness, suave yoshi lisp.
Name:
Anonymous2007-09-13 7:16 ID:74Ao4BKH
>>1
More like Java, Haskell, etc. are Turing tarpits.
Name:
Anonymous2007-09-13 16:11 ID:RLi1Kqwy
>>10
Don't worry about it :) If you don't want it any more, feel free to drop it into a charity book store.
Thanks for the thought :)
Name:
Anonymous2007-09-13 22:59 ID:lHGQ62Fw
>>9
Good question. I have also noticed the idiots come in waves. I try to time it with school holidays, or pot harvest season, or welfare check mail day. I haven't found the predictable pattern yet.
Name:
Anonymous2007-09-13 23:29 ID:VZkdL2J4
>>13
I haven't seen a pattern; it seems like those trolls acting like Lisp is a real language are here all the time.
Name:
Anonymous2007-09-14 10:45 ID:zKID+yTV
python
Name:
Anonymous2007-09-14 21:30 ID:p9hOJnke
jar lisp interpreter.
=====
#define d define
#d a include
#a <stdio.h>
#a <string.h>
#a <ctype.h>
#d p char*
#d P ,(p)
#d T(E) !strcmp(E,"()")
#d U return
#d W while
#d X sbrk(199)
#d z atof
#d e isspace
#d D A(_)
#d E S(C(_))
#d B(y) p y(_)p _;{
#d G(y,V) B(y)p i;U sprintf(i=X,"%lf",z(E)V z(S(C(D)))),i;}
>>17
Good call, Sherlock. Can't get anything past you.
Name:
Anonymous2009-02-25 7:52
MICROSOFT office to code that is easier to compile into a shell script and in spite of several decades of system design and innovations such as shared libraries.