Return Styles: Pseud0ch, Terminal, Valhalla, NES, Geocities, Blue Moon. Entire thread

So...

Name: Anonymous 2007-09-12 6:59 ID:Xs0PchJJ

Has anything actually worth using and still in use today ever been made entirely in Lisp?

Name: Anonymous 2007-09-12 7:04 ID:GLGlckNr

Amazon

Name: Anonymous 2007-09-12 7:04 ID:VIaA2O9S

windows xp?

Name: Anonymous 2007-09-12 7:12 ID:Udf/sIZ7

emacs

Name: Anonymous 2007-09-12 7:15 ID:3yGIh+h8

Google used Common Lisp for some things

Name: Anonymous 2007-09-12 8:42 ID:Rh++1R4r

>>5
not much though, AFAIK they usually use either Python or Java for projects.

>>4
Nope! Emacs is just a Lisp interpreter; it's written in C.

>>3
Windows is written in C++--+.

>>2
They used to be all Lisp. The newer code is Java, and all the Lisp code is being pretty much phased out since Java programmers are much easier to find. I suppose eventually the Lisp will be phased out entirely.

>>1
http://common-lisp.net/project/lisppaste/
http://common-lisp.net/project/clkd/
... actually, just browse through http://common-lisp.net/project/
http://www.kahua.org/show/en
http://freshmeat.net/projects/aftpd/
http://www.gnu.org/software/mcron/
http://www.scsh.net/resources/graphics.html
(and a handful of other more-or-less-crap window managers)

Name: Anonymous 2007-09-12 8:49 ID:Heaven

>>6
I think you are wrong, large portions of windows are written in LISP.

Name: Anonymous 2007-09-12 8:50 ID:Heaven

>>6
Nope! Emacs is just a Lisp interpreter; it's written in C.

LOLWAT

Also, sage for descending quoting.

Name: Anonymous 2007-09-12 8:50 ID:Heaven

>>7
I think you are wrong, I've read Windows source code.

Name: Anonymous 2007-09-12 8:53 ID:VIaA2O9S

>>9
I think you are wrong, I've written Windows source code.

Name: Anonymous 2007-09-12 8:58 ID:3yGIh+h8

Large portions of Windows are written in Befunge

Name: Anonymous 2007-09-12 8:59 ID:beqnxh3k

>>10
I think you are wrong. I'm steve bal-DEVELOPERS DEVELOPERS DEVELOPERS DEVELOPERS DEVELOPERS DEVELOPERS DEVELOPERS DEVELOPERS DEVELOPERS DEVELOPERS DEVELOPERS DEVELOPERS DEVELOPERS DEVELOPERS DEVELOPERS DEVELOPERS DEVELOPERS DEVELOPERS DEVELOPERS DEVELOPERS DEVELOPERS DEVELOPERS DEVELOPERS DEVELOPERS DEVELOPERS DEVELOPERS DEVELOPERS DEVELOPERS DEVELOPERS DEVELOPERS DEVELOPERS DEVELOPERS DEVELOPERS DEVELOPERS DEVELOPERS DEVELOPERS DEVELOPERS DEVELOPERS DEVELOPERS DEVELOPERS DEVELOPERS DEVELOPERS

Name: Anonymous 2007-09-12 9:02 ID:Rh++1R4r

>>11
Actually, Befunge wrote Windows as an accidental side effect of the standard "hello world".

Name: Anonymous 2007-09-12 9:14 ID:9NqYzPt5

>>13

 v
>?<
 ^
Amirite

Name: Anonymous 2007-09-12 9:45 ID:07Iwa50h

SBCL

Name: Anonymous 2007-09-12 9:48 ID:azGHcLBU

>>15
Nope! SBCL is just a Lisp interpreter and compiler; it's written in C.

Name: Anonymous 2007-09-12 9:50 ID:6BBztOu3

>>16
SBCL is written in Lisp, dumbass.  Build it from source.

Name: Anonymous 2007-09-12 9:53 ID:azGHcLBU

>>17
1) See http://sbcl.cvs.sourceforge.net/sbcl/sbcl/src/runtime/
2) See http://www.youareanidiot.org/

LOL

Name: Anonymous 2007-09-12 10:01 ID:6BBztOu3

Nope! SBCL is just a Lisp interpreter and compiler; it's written in C.

I was referring to this incorrect assertion.  There is no 'interpreter' per se and the compiler is written in Lisp and generates native code.  The runtime has C components.

Name: Anonymous 2007-09-12 10:21 ID:Heaven

>>19
you got owned OLOLOLOLOLO

Name: Anonymous 2007-09-12 12:32 ID:Heaven

2) See http://www.youareanidiot.org/
Thanks, bookmarked.

Name: Anonymous 2007-09-12 13:20 ID:azGHcLBU

>>21

(  ____ \|\     /|(  ____ \| \    /\  |\     /|(  ___  )|\     /|
| (    \/| )   ( || (    \/|  \  / /  ( \   / )| (   ) || )   ( |
| (__    | |   | || |      |  (_/ /    \ (_) / | |   | || |   | |
|  __)   | |   | || |      |   _ (      \   /  | |   | || |   | |
| (      | |   | || |      |  ( \ \      ) (   | |   | || |   | |
| )      | (___) || (____/\|  /  \ \     | |   | (___) || (___) |
|/       (_______)(_______/|_/    \/     \_/   (_______)(_______)

Name: Anonymous 2007-09-12 13:22 ID:4awczjVH

Maxima

Name: Anonymous 2007-09-12 15:39 ID:Xs0PchJJ

So... nothing actually worth using was written 100% in Lisp?

Name: Anonymous 2007-09-12 15:52 ID:azGHcLBU

>>24
MAXIMA

Name: Anonymous 2007-09-12 15:57 ID:0ORZqB0+

>>24
ALL OF YAHOO ^_________________^;;

Name: Anonymous 2007-09-12 20:12 ID:6BBztOu3

>>24
Define "worth using".  If you're in advanced computing, there's shitloads of stuff worth using in Lisp.  Lisp also does not seem to lend itself towards applications, but libraries and tools.

Name: Anonymous 2007-09-12 20:20 ID:7JxIRr/B

MY PENIS IS WRITTEN IN LISP
MY PENIS IS WRITTEN IN LISP
MY PENIS IS WRITTEN IN LISP
MY PENIS IS WRITTEN IN LISP
MY PENIS IS WRITTEN IN LISP
MY PENIS IS WRITTEN IN LISP
MY PENIS IS WRITTEN IN LISP
MY PENIS IS WRITTEN IN LISP
MY PENIS IS WRITTEN IN LISP
MY PENIS IS WRITTEN IN LISP
MY PENIS IS WRITTEN IN LISP

Name: Anonymous 2007-09-12 20:22 ID:7JxIRr/B

Lisp is crap, just fucking deal with it.

You're like a bunch of audiophile fags who can't admit that vinyl records are shit and spend their time hating on CDs and other superior media.

Name: Anonymous 2007-09-12 21:11 ID:TxIrzdvM

>>29 hasn't ever listened to vinyl on high quality equipment

Name: Anonymous 2007-09-12 21:23 ID:usaPAcBI

>>29 hasn't coded Lisp with Slime in Emacs typing on a Model M either.

Name: Anonymous 2007-09-12 21:46 ID:6BBztOu3

>>29
You are a low skilled programmer, just fucking deal with it.

You're like a bunch of ricer fags who can't admit that their Civics are shit and spend their time hating on Koenigsegg and other superior cars.

Name: Anonymous 2007-09-12 21:46 ID:Heaven

>>30
>>31
Have just proven that they're losers. (>>30 is a much bigger loser than >>31 though)

Name: Anonymous 2007-09-12 22:02 ID:usaPAcBI

>>33
Well, thanks for thinking I'm not the biggest loser, but as a Lisper I'm so smug that I really don't care. >>30, I'll be the biggest if you want.

Name: Anonymous 2007-09-12 22:27 ID:R113MGRI

no one who uses lisp would ever reveal it because that would be a huge competitive disadvantage.

Name: Anonymous 2007-09-12 22:49 ID:Heaven

>>32
You're obviously clueless and haven't read SICP hard enough to participate in this forum newsgroup.

In other words: GTFO, EXPERT PROGRAMMERS ONLY

Name: Anonymous 2007-09-12 22:50 ID:Heaven

>>35
Truth, nobody would buy a Lisp product.

Name: Anonymous 2007-09-12 23:40 ID:6BBztOu3

>>36 didn't understand what >>32 was retorting to.

Name: Anonymous 2010-08-26 1:44

Three years later and it's still accurate.
Newer Posts
Don't change these.
Name: Email:
Entire Thread Thread List
All trademarks and copyrights on this site are owned by their respective parties. All comments and posts are the responsibility of their own posters.
- Tinychan + 2ch Mode -