/prog/ - monadic progrmaming in scheme

Name: Anonymous 2007-09-12 0:29 ID:fbzwbQp3

anyone done it? do you like it? kthx

Name: Anonymous 2007-09-12 3:16 ID:/yCO56JK

HURR Continuation Passing Style.

It took a long time before haskell faggots figured that one out.

Name: Anonymous 2007-09-12 4:57 ID:pul3K6EL

>>1
Just code imperatively when you need side effects. Then code functionally when you need not.

Name: Anonymous 2007-09-12 7:54 ID:CdgvmYIm

http://okmij.org/ftp/Scheme/monad-in-Scheme.html
http://okmij.org/ftp/Scheme/misc.html#monadic-io
http://okmij.org/ftp/Scheme/misc.html#multiple-value-effect

I'd only consider it an academic curiosity though. As >>3 said, Scheme allows lots of programming paradigms and in the spirit of choosing the right tool for the job I think I/O should be coded imperatively.

Name: Anonymous 2007-09-12 13:22 ID:Ysr+LTgU

>>1
( ____ \|\ /|( ____ \| \ /\ |\ /|( ___ )|\ /| | ( \/| ) ( || ( \/| \ / / ( \ / )| ( ) || ) ( | | (__ | | | || | | (_/ / \ (_) / | | | || | | | | __) | | | || | | _ ( \ / | | | || | | | | ( | | | || | | ( \ \ ) ( | | | || | | | | ) | (___) || (____/\| / \ \ | | | (___) || (___) | |/ (_______)(_______/|_/ \/ \_/ (_______)(_______)

Name: Anonymous 2007-09-12 16:23 ID:Heaven

We've been getting a lot of good, coherent posts lately.
What's wrong? Is the "holy fuck at your ID" guy on vacation?

Name: Anonymous 2013-01-19 23:07

/prog/ will be spammed continuously until further notice. we apologize for any inconvenience this may cause.

monadic progrmaming in scheme

1 Name: Anonymous 2007-09-12 0:29 ID:fbzwbQp3

2 Name: Anonymous 2007-09-12 3:16 ID:/yCO56JK

3 Name: Anonymous 2007-09-12 4:57 ID:pul3K6EL

4 Name: Anonymous 2007-09-12 7:54 ID:CdgvmYIm

5 Name: Anonymous 2007-09-12 13:22 ID:Ysr+LTgU

6 Name: Anonymous 2007-09-12 16:23 ID:Heaven