[1]> (> (common lisp) (scheme))

true

``If you studied Lisp in college and came away with the impression that it was only an academic language with no real-world application, chances are you learned Scheme."


(scheme)FAIL

(> (programming-language-greatness (find-language-named 'common-lisp)
   (programming-language-greatness (find-language-named 'scheme)))

>>2
chances are you were right.
fixed

Common Lisp may have better tools, but it's made of legacy and hack, and its Lisp-2 nature is annoying and dishonourable (a Lisp, yet not purely first-class functions). On the other hand, some have extended Scheme with a lot of portable utilities, and this is why I prefer PLT Scheme.

That said, I use Lisp to achieve Satori and mindfap, but for actual work I do Python.

This a problem with   the leap from   2D to 3D   is that 3D   is a race   to reality and   the returns on   effort diminish quickly.

The time your modern languages came along   and made it   do Wonderful it.