After a cursory examination it appears that >>2 and >>3 are correct, and that you, OP, and anyone posting on this "SH/SC" are what we refer to as "faggots."
A cursory examination indicates that it is inferior, even to /comp/.
Name:
Anonymous2007-09-04 21:33 ID:ETxf5x6p
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!
LOL FAIL.
Especially since I don't see any ads, but I do see HUGE FUCKING BOLD TEXT TELLING ME TO PAY SOME FAGGOT 10 BUX TO GET RID OF THE ADS THAT AREN'T FUCKING THERE.
I'm looking for a good book (or several books) on general OO design patterns. After searching around online I've found some good links on interesting stuff, but I'd really like to hear what other people here would recommend for a book on general OO design theory when it comes to designing and structuring your programs based on what you want to accomplish.
A good example would be Chapter 11 in Stroustrup's The C++ Programming language where he stops emphasizing the syntax of the code so much and just talks for a little bit about the theory of "dividing and conquering" when it comes to software design.
If the book examples are in C# all the much better, but since the same concepts apply I'm really open to reading anything since the emphasis is not really about the exact syntax anyways.
Just searching Amazon there are tons of books, but I'd really like to hear the opinions of people more experienced than myself here about what they've found useful or what books they've found to be kind of misrepresented by the title.
Thanks in advance!
Name:
Anonymous2007-09-04 22:08 ID:WCImNq47
SH/SC and SA in general is a pile of shit. The moderation stinks, and you get banned for doing anything interesting so the whole site is full of babies, and SH/SC is full of first-year CS student know-alls and Mac fags who get you banned if you offend their delicate widdle nerd shit.
Name:
Anonymous2007-09-04 22:22 ID:1wFcTjok
>>9
Unlike /prog/, which is full of... I don't even know what. I consider myself to be a sort of Lisp troll, I suppose.
Name:
Anonymous2007-09-04 23:46 ID:l6Q1BF4j
i primarily identify in life as a lisp troll
Name:
Anonymous2007-09-04 23:54 ID:I2UN2Jta
I wrote "lisp troll" on my taxes.
Name:
Anonymous2007-09-05 1:33 ID:URqSHGxY
Another two years later, in 1957, I married and Dutch marriage rites require you to state your profession and I stated that I was a programmer. But the municipal authorities of the town of Amsterdam did not accept it on the grounds that there was no such profession. And, believe it or not, but under the heading ``profession'' my marriage act shows the ridiculous entry ``lisp troll''!
Name:
Anonymous2007-09-05 4:09 ID:dGc6Eh3z
>>7
You don't even have to see that. Just add this filter to adblock:
forums.somethingawful.com#div(notregistered)
Name:
Anonymous2007-09-05 4:56 ID:hO3oKMG9
I'm a Python troll
Name:
Anonymous2007-09-05 5:07 ID:XHFI5L/r
I'm a general-purpose troll. But I like to post a decent amount of interesting or useful posts here too.
Name:
Anonymous2007-09-05 5:44 ID:MBl9jveD
I'm a general purpose/meme-forcing troll. I not only attempt to force memes, I will constantly remind others that I'm the inventor of successfully forced memes (forced indentation, how do you X threads, other car/cdr, `` quoting-style, etc...)
Name:
Anonymous2007-09-05 7:01 ID:Zx9KDKtb
Quote from SH/SC:
Over the past 5 years or so, I've come into random bursts of enthusiasm where I decide I want to be a computer programmer. Every "So you want to program" guide I saw online said to start with C++, so I did. Several times. I must've written "Hello, World!" 1,000 times. I just can't get it. CASE CLOSED
Name:
Anonymous2007-09-05 10:38 ID:tJ2m47fz
>>15
Hi, I'm a ONE WORD, THE FORCED INDENTATION OF CODE, THREAD OVER troll.
ONE WORD, THE FORCED INDENTATION OF CODE, THREAD OVER