Return Styles: Pseud0ch, Terminal, Valhalla, NES, Geocities, Blue Moon.

Pages: 1-

do expert programmers read lots of book?

Name: Anonymous 2007-08-11 22:19 ID:8+GaCBwj

it seems the only way to reach satori is to read lots of books I have lying around..I have K&R, Expert C: Deep Secrets, and 2 Perl Oreilly books...would an expert really have to read all these or am I just wasting my time if I dont know it magically :( ...How many programming books do expert programmers usually read in a year or a month?

and I already know what book I'm supposed to be reading..

Name: Anonymous 2007-08-11 22:23 ID:0CUeQqF0

The Structure and Interpretation of Computer Programs. Thread over.

Name: Anonymous 2007-08-11 22:31 ID:Tzp5qoSk

Computer Magic!

(>>=) is the most powerful spell I know

Name: Anonymous 2007-08-11 22:50 ID:Qi8NCa4H

I make sure to go to work on a bus or train. Why? So I can spend my time reading books (or take a nap). I average about one technical book a month.

I try to read books that are dramatically different from what I'm familiar with. I'm currently reading a trio of usability books, next will probably be some Haskell, then Programming Erlang, then Refactoring, then Lisp (SICP, Lisp in Small Pieces), then Thinking in Forth, then...

You get the idea. Yes, I have a long way to Satori.

Name: Anonymous 2007-08-11 23:02 ID:5h0+06d0

if you don't read books regularly you will actually become a fucking idiot.

Name: Anonymous 2007-08-11 23:31 ID:sPNBpCuJ

I am probably the most EXPERT programmer on this board, and I never read books.

Name: Anonymous 2007-08-12 0:35 ID:b6/FgqE8

I LISTEN TO INFECTED MUSHROOM WHILE I WRITE JAVA BECAUSE I AM 1337

Name: Anonymous 2007-08-12 0:36 ID:574ptupS

>>4
If you haven't read it, you should add Practical Common Lisp to that list.

Name: Anonymous 2007-08-12 5:03 ID:1N6abVAq

It happens in bursts as required.. I haven't read a technical book in months, and this week I'm probably going to read 5.

Throw in the web and other people's code, and I'm reading all the time.. if you can't read, you don't stand a chance. Good news is if you read all the time you get faster at it.

Name: Anonymous 2007-08-12 7:45 ID:TmVyisop

Tech blogs are the way to go, i've two books on my speciality, but i get far more userful information on the blog rss feeds then them

Name: Anonymous 2007-08-12 7:55 ID:/bb9vLyc

Only morons that don't know how to learn things read books.

Real programmers read manuals and specifications, as well as quick introductory texts.

Name: Anonymous 2007-08-12 8:27 ID:Heaven

do expert programmers read lots of book?

Name: Anonymous 2007-08-12 8:27 ID:Heaven

read lots of book?

Name: Anonymous 2007-08-12 8:28 ID:Heaven

lots of book

Name: Anonymous 2007-08-12 8:54 ID:DvDQbr3K

>>14
suck my ass

Name: Anonymous 2007-08-12 9:22 ID:Heaven

>>15
book

Name: Anonymous 2007-08-12 10:17 ID:5SsNN9l4

EXPERT PROGRAMMERS HAVE LOTS OF MERDE ABSTRAITE DE BULL

Name: Anonymous 2007-08-12 12:29 ID:/bb9vLyc

EXPERT PROGRAMMERS WRITE BOOKS !!

Name: Anonymous 2007-08-12 12:48 ID:6CEV87UM

No, expert programmer win IOCCC. 

Name: Anonymous 2007-08-12 13:14 ID:BSvgTqAA

>>1

I don't read books about programming languages I use as much as I concentrate on books about more topical subjects relating to /what/ I'm programming.

Making a game engine?  Bone up on graphics theory books, linear algebra texts, and most importantly, that big orange book on collision detection.  By the time you're an expert programmer, the language of your choice is second-nature, so instead you just need to educate yourself on the domain of what you're doing.

Name: Anonymous 2007-08-12 16:21 ID:gSuaA6km

>>18
:o

/prog/ should write a book

Name: Anonymous 2007-08-12 16:35 ID:qQoDoHe+

>>21
Nah, we are under much too heavy influence of one certain book.

Name: Anonymous 2007-08-12 16:43 ID:Heaven

>>22
At least we could try to force THE SUSSMAN to write a foreword.

Name: Anonymous 2007-08-12 16:55 ID:3sTLQDv+

Mm. Both K&R and Deep C Secrets are good reads, but a bit dated.
I recently read "The Mythical Man-month", purportedly always topical. I especially enjoyed the chapter about pitfalls to avoid when allocating your programmers memory allowances. Truly timeless. :/

Name: Anonymous 2007-08-12 17:16 ID:Heaven

I don't think I have ever read a dead-tree book about programming.. and I have no formal education in this field. But I do write code for living and I'm good at it. I doubt that I'm missing much, Internet is a wonderful thing.

Name: Anonymous 2007-08-13 1:12 ID:8gvTigVq

>>25
so how the hell did you get a job?

Name: Anonymous 2007-08-13 2:05 ID:mx3McmER

>>26
Probably an EXPERT JAVA PROGRAMMER

Name: Anonymous 2007-08-13 3:41 ID:Heaven

>>27
who listens to Infected Mushroom.

Name: Anonymous 2007-08-13 3:49 ID:XFaV3y+4

BEEEOWWOWWOWWAKAAKAWOWOWWWWUUUWOWOWAKACHIGACHIGAWOWWWWRROWOWRWAKWWAKWWAKWWAKWWAKWWAKWWAKWWAKWWAKWWAKWWAKWWAKW

Name: Anonymous 2007-08-13 4:01 ID:QYdxDe00

>>26
Filled out the Mickey D's application. Presto, a job!

Name: Anonymous 2007-08-13 5:23 ID:4qWB/j5z

>>26
Went to an interview, showed that I can do something (HTML and PHP LOL), agreed to work on minimum wage, repeatedly proved that I'm capable. Now I'm solely responsible for a custom business application with more than 100000 customers, billing, CRMS and all that shit. Earning enough to have a nice living, too.

Name: Anonymous 2007-08-13 5:56 ID:jRMm0eyT

Woman with book is liek... liek horse with... how you say? Wings, yes.

Name: Anonymous 2007-08-13 6:02 ID:v+ikqo02

think about it. no matter how smart you are, it is a way to relearn by yourself what the folks at this field learnt in the past sixty years. thus you must read, unless you want to reinvent the wheel of learning (see >>11)

Name: Anonymous 2007-08-13 6:22 ID:+0U7yLKP

>>33 No matter how smart you are, your paragraph was of substandard quality. Let me try to rephrase your ambiguous babble:

"We must read books or we won't know things that other people have known."

Upon reading this phrase I felt a profound sense of enlightenment.





Name: Anonymous 2007-08-13 6:25 ID:v+ikqo02

>>34
yes. what I said was obvious. nevertheless, some people still don't get it.

Name: Anonymous 2007-08-13 6:30 ID:iQcqVmmL

>>35
you fuqing angered an expert programmer

Name: Anonymous 2007-08-13 6:45 ID:v+ikqo02

>>36
the mere title of this thread should anger said expert programmer.

Name: Anonymous 2011-03-31 11:59

I am the phantom autist

Name: Anonymous 2011-03-31 11:59

I am the phantom autist

Don't change these.
Name: Email:
Entire Thread Thread List