Return Styles: Pseud0ch, Terminal, Valhalla, NES, Geocities, Blue Moon. Entire thread

POST YOUR SYNTAX HIGHLIGHTING STYLE

Name: OP !!s15PQp1KDxpnAmH 2007-07-23 21:40 ID:Gh0XGG7m

/prog/rammers, what does your typical code window look like?

Name: Anonymous 2007-07-31 8:38 ID:Heaven

[spoiler]

Name: Anonymous 2007-07-31 8:39 ID:Heaven

>>158
But if there's more than on spoiler, then what?

>>156
Also, SAGE doesn't work.

Name: Anonymous 2007-07-31 8:47 ID:+BN9eaQa

>>159
No.

>>160
It doesn't look good because you unconsciously realise that although the antialiasing is quite nice with large fonts, it's totally shit with smaller fonts.

Name: Anonymous 2007-07-31 9:19 ID:Heaven

>>163
what's wrong with it?
also, the text in >>159 is about 10pt (about 3.5mm high) on my screen, which is about the smallest i can read comfortably.

>>160
maybe you just don't like monospaced and/or sans-serif fonts?
either that, or you just like looking at text that looks like it's made out of lego blocks.

Name: Anonymous 2007-07-31 10:08 ID:Z7sk4JkH

It doesn't look good because you unconsciously realise that although the antialiasing is quite nice with large fonts, it's totally shit with smaller fonts.
i doubt you'd want to go much smaller than this, which is still pretty nice: http://img403.imageshack.us/img403/47/textzh3.png

Name: Anonymous 2007-07-31 11:43 ID:/YQDRv92

>>163

http://img77.imageshack.us/img77/8949/dejavumonosszf6.png

Dejavu Sans Mono 10pt

Name: Anonymous 2007-07-31 17:18 ID:Heaven

>>166
wut language is that lol

Name: Anonymous 2007-07-31 17:56 ID:Heaven

>>166
fucking phpfag

Name: Anonymous 2007-07-31 18:03 ID:H9IdNStM

http://i17.tinypic.com/5y2jmkj.png

Name: Anonymous 2007-07-31 18:11 ID:MsRxRnAm

http://img404.imageshack.us/img404/1503/codewindowtq2.jpg

can't let the code be read cause it's work stuff

perl in vim w/split screen

Name: Anonymous 2007-07-31 18:11 ID:vsiFFFnJ

>>166
Nice colour scheme

>>169
1. Macfag
2. $5000 please
3. Another $5000 please for TextMate
4. Argh my eyes, tiny and unreadable text is tiny and unreadable

Name: Anonymous 2007-07-31 19:02 ID:Heaven

>>171
1. UNIX-with-a-great-interface fag
2. €1800 please
3. €40 for TextMate (it's such a great editor I'd gladly pay triple the price for it)
4. Your eyesight is extremely poor, consult an optician

fixed

Name: Anonymous 2007-07-31 20:09 ID:cvRrUpQd

>>166
Does your Dejavu Sans Mono look exactly like my Bitstream Vera Sans Mono (>>59). Anyway, good fonts, I like them too.

Name: Anonymous 2007-07-31 20:12 ID:Heaven

>>172
No, he's right, too much contrast, too small, too blurry. Though, yeah, depends on the monitor and resolution, I guess.

Name: Anonymous 2007-07-31 20:25 ID:vsiFFFnJ

>>172
1. Digital lifestyle, slick design, trendy technologies, fashionable looks
2. Still a huge ripoff
3. Kate and PSPad have the same and more features, for free
4. I can read them, but it makes my eyes bleed from too much contrast and effort of reading such small letters, and it's much harder to spot typos when they're so small.

>>173
Protip: Bitstream made Vera free minus the name, and DejaVu is a community-extended version of it.

Name: Anonymous 2007-07-31 21:43 ID:Tcjvl1Py

>>166
Is that KWrite ?

Name: Anonymous 2007-08-01 0:25 ID:aEBfXvM8

eclipse anyone?

Name: Anonymous 2007-08-01 0:28 ID:KGoESjAT

No? lol.

Name: Anonymous 2007-08-01 0:39 ID:mceXfRlG

ion wm, many tabs, vim full screen.

Name: Anonymous 2007-08-01 2:34 ID:VX0CkhW/

Eclipse is for Javafags

Name: Anonymous 2008-01-15 19:53

First non-ID reply.

Raising awesome thread from the dead.

Name: Anonymous 2008-01-15 19:55

I've been waiting for this thread to come back so I could post:

Syntax highlighting is for fags. What? You can't read code on your own?

Name: Anonymous 2008-01-15 20:10

>>182 has obviously never written anything other then a Mickey Mouse 20 line toy program.

Name: Anonymous 2008-01-15 20:12

>>183
Like you, who can't even read a program without syntax highlighting, have? What, would you not recognize a function call if it weren't blue?

Name: Anonymous 2008-01-15 20:16

Syntax highlighting helps reduce mental burden.

Name: Anonymous 2008-01-15 20:22

black background. white text. because i'm not a faggot.

Name: Anonymous 2008-01-15 20:23

>>185
Only to a certain point. I used to use very heavy highlighting for many years and thought that it makes reading code easier. Then I realized that the blinkenlights are not really doing any good. Now I use only three types of highlighting: normal code, comments and string literals.

>>183
Add a typeface for spelling errors to your syntax highlighter.

Name: Anonymous 2008-01-15 23:35

Just turn on all the default syntax highlighting available.  It's not something worth wasting time over customizing, especially if you're going to be working at different workstations or reinstalling OSes.

Name: Anonymous 2008-01-16 3:54

WTF is with you guys and your blurry fonts?
http://img183.imageshack.us/img183/9550/75968781nb9.png

Name: Anonymous 2008-01-16 4:46

Hey, I remember creating this thread

Name: Anonymous 2008-01-16 5:33

Now I finally understand. I just compared the "blurry" style font on an LCD TFT monitor with the same style on a CRT. The blurry style looks alright on the LCD but is noticeably blurry on the CRT. Disabling the hinting feature on the LCD screen results in a horribly aliased font. In conclusion, hinting is for LCDs and not for CRTs.

Name: Anonymous 2008-01-16 5:44

>>2
THAT LOOKS LIKE FUCKING SCHEME I LOVE FUCKING SCHEME

Name: Anonymous 2008-01-16 11:34

>>191
All your font terms are mixed up.

Name: Anonymous 2008-01-16 11:52

>>193
You have no chance to survive make your time.

Name: Anonymous 2008-01-16 15:46

http://img89.imageshack.us/img89/4585/000043sshot7313f37c9ie6.png

amidoingitright?

Name: Anonymous 2008-01-16 15:51

>>195
reverse much?

Name: Anonymous 2008-01-16 16:51

>>196
Probably not, it's barely modified. Standard color schemes, and for instance names are not demangled in IDA. The dead giveaway are of course the autocomments (``increment by 1'' lol).

Here's mine: http://img516.imageshack.us/img516/9913/mysetupeg4.png

Name: Anonymous 2008-01-16 16:56

>>197
Dutch people? On my /prog/?

Name: Anonymous 2008-01-16 17:01

>>197
yeah, was playing with the options
and there wasn't much to modify
/the layout is fine with me

Name: Anonymous 2008-01-16 17:43

I've been using a mid tone scheme+consolas which has been working nicely for awhile: http://www.jb55.com/images/idecolorjan2008.png
Newer Posts
Don't change these.
Name: Email:
Entire Thread Thread List
All trademarks and copyrights on this site are owned by their respective parties. All comments and posts are the responsibility of their own posters.
- Tinychan + 2ch Mode -