Return Styles: Pseud0ch, Terminal, Valhalla, NES, Geocities, Blue Moon.

Pages: 1-

Lisp? no THANKS

Name: Anonymous 2007-07-14 15:29 ID:RaFZLwCc

I am make a new progrmming language based on the work of MCARTHY It is named

ГISP

Central idea is SYNTAX

(COND (a b) (c d) (e f))
is replaced by
(a → b, c → d, e → f)

GIve me OTHER ideas to replace all of lisp with SYNTAX thnk.
I await the reply..

Name: Anonymous 2007-07-14 15:34 ID:Heaven

Kill yourself.

Name: Anonymous 2007-07-14 17:17 ID:O+l7XGDj

GISRRRR?

Name: Anonymous 2007-07-14 17:20 ID:Heaven

Вы глупая промежность!

пизда!

Name: Anonymous 2007-07-14 17:21 ID:BzIQe1Xy

propose it for r7rs, I hear they're taking all kinds of crazy shit for 6.

Name: Anonymous 2007-07-14 18:17 ID:RaFZLwCc

OK I am look through UNICODE to deice what is good for programming  ΓISP.

∀ = map
∅ = nil (?)
()[]{}〈〉‹›〔〕«»⦅⦆「」『』〈〉《》«»{}〔〕〘〙【】〖〗[] = as many paranthesis for as much expressivbility as possibles
☞ = GOTO
λ = lambda
Γ = L

Name: Anonymous 2007-07-14 20:14 ID:aY/T5pyW

what keyboard would be capable of such an undertaking

Name: Anonymous 2007-07-14 20:31 ID:O+l7XGDj

>>7

A Chinese keyboard, they have about 20,000 keys.

Name: Anonymous 2007-07-14 22:56 ID:ZoT9EsGH

I ΓOΓ'D

Name: Anonymous 2007-07-14 23:47 ID:HdQNK0fL

Name: Anonymous 2007-07-14 23:48 ID:Heaven

I ror'd

Name: Anonymous 2007-07-14 23:48 ID:Heaven

omg ror

Name: Anonymous 2007-07-15 0:42 ID:OnmQE8/I

Ⓘ ⓟⓡⓞⓟⓞⓢⓔ ⓣⓗⓐⓣ ⓣⓗⓘⓢ ⓛⓐⓝⓖⓤⓐⓖⓔ ⓢⓗⓞⓤⓛⓓ ⓤⓢⓔ ⓒⓘⓡⓒⓛⓔⓓ ⓛⓔⓣⓣⓔⓡⓢ ⓕⓞⓡ ⓐⓛⓛ ⓕⓤⓝⓒⓣⓘⓞⓝⓢ ⓣⓗⓐⓣ ⓓⓞⓝ'ⓣ ⓗⓐⓥⓔ ⓐⓝⓨ ⓢⓟⓔⓒⓘⓐⓛ ⓢⓨⓝⓣⓐⓧ.

Name: Anonymous 2007-07-15 1:14 ID:YlsZ8H25

ΓoΓΓerskates

Name: Anonymous 2007-07-15 1:47 ID:K5k0pl9T

ɹỊɐ-ləq pəllɐɔ uʍoʇ ɐ ɟo əɔuỊɹd əɥʇ əɯɐɔəq I ʍoɥ noʎ lləʇ ll‚I
əɹəɥʇ ʇɥნỊɹ ʇỊs ʇsn! əʇnuỊɯ ɐ əʞɐʇ oʇ əʞỊl p‚I puɐ
uʍop əpỊsdn pəuɹnʇ ´pəddỊlɟ ʇoნ əɟỊl
ʎɯ ʍoɥ ʇnoqɐ llɐ ʎɹoʇs ɐ sỊ sỊɥʇ ʍoN

Name: Anonymous 2007-07-15 1:55 ID:Heaven

>>13
(>ⓞ_ⓞ)>
just imagine how the code would look like

Name: Anonymous 2007-07-15 9:59 ID:Yrd32fIE

<=> as a primitive operator, of course

(define (<=> a b)
 (cond
 ((< a b) true)
 ((= a b) true)
 ((> a b) true)
 (else false)))

Name: Anonymous 2007-07-15 10:48 ID:EeTeUxIG

>>17
(<=>) is so fundamental that anything else could be defined through it.
We should formalize <=>-calculus.

Name: Anonymous 2007-07-15 13:24 ID:qMnArLA6

>>17
it iwll be closer to
(define <=> a b
 ((< a b) → t,
  (= a b) → t,
  (> a b) → t))

Name: Anonymous 2007-07-15 16:07 ID:Heaven

>>19
Forgetting else makes <=> completely useless

Name: Anonymous 2007-07-15 17:09 ID:qMnArLA6

>>20
(else false)
is implicit in a cond duh..

Name: Anonymous 2007-07-16 3:26 ID:IrGN/Hws

>>19
fucking [aa] tags look different everyday

Name: Anonymous 2007-07-16 7:59 ID:IrGN/Hws

ГISP - pronounced Risp, a new Lisp Dialect

Name: Anonymous 2007-07-16 8:04 ID:RDiNr/FK

>>23
Actually it'd be pronounced more like "Gheisp".

Name: Anonymous 2007-07-16 8:46 ID:IrGN/Hws

>>24
"Gheisp" - a new dialect of ГISP

Name: Anonymous 2007-07-16 9:56 ID:IrGN/Hws

Every part of the language is defined in an OBJECT ORIENTED WAY at compile time then optimized FULLY for runtime.

Name: Anonymous 2007-07-16 10:02 ID:IrGN/Hws

>>26
is this a GOOd orr Bad idea??????

Name: Anonymous 2007-07-16 14:08 ID:ETpVhzGo

>>27
It's too vague to be too good or too bad, but "Every part ... OBJECT ORIENTED WAY" rang a warning bell and "optimized FULLY" another. Probably bad.

Name: Anonymous 2007-07-16 14:48 ID:IrGN/Hws

>>28
...

I pour my soul into this effort and you tell me this????

Name: Anonymous 2009-01-14 12:35

LISP

Name: ​​​​​​​​​​ 2010-09-10 4:08

Name: Anonymous 2010-11-15 20:46

Name: Anonymous 2011-02-04 15:43


Don't change these.
Name: Email:
Entire Thread Thread List