PRINT "Hello, Ian!"
lol.... but how do you make a game?
Name:
Anonymous2007-07-05 12:46 ID:v1arWLvH
Anonymous is about to make you his bitch
Name:
Anonymous2007-07-05 13:34 ID:kVaIWkD0
As for a programming language to use I would suggest BBCode due to it's advanced rendering/compiling and recursive function abilities. I'm asuming you're not yet an EXPERT BBCODE PROGRAMMER, so if you just Google "BBCode tutorials" you should be able to find out how to go about things.
Good luck!
Name:
Anonymous2007-07-05 14:26 ID:+aiTe1xH
Is very easy to make a computer game like Halo, C&C and others!
You don't need a team do work on it, just start programming and after a couple of weeks is done!
Try Pascal, it's a great language!
Name:
Anonymous2007-07-05 14:36 ID:eI2NrGWF
I'd suggest using COBOL. As you may know, over 80% of the world's financial software is written in COBOL--and knowing the beancounters from the financial department and their way to spend the day, this includes at least several high-profile games.
Name:
Anonymous2007-07-05 16:53 ID:auAwxIz6
>>5
YEAH VERY FUCKING FUNNY
I SPENT TWO FUKCING HOURS SEARCHING "BBCode tutorials" YOU ASSHOLE
AND ALL I FIND IS BULLSHIT YOU CANT WRITE A GAME IN BBCODE YOU MORON YOUY WASTED TWO HOURS OF MY FUCKING LIFE!!!!!!!!!!!!
FUCK YOU AND FUCK THIS BOARD YOU ARE FULL OF ASSHOLES
>>8
I don't know what you're talking about, dude. I just finished an awesome 3D space combat game in BBCode and I'm about to go search for a publisher. If you're not willing to put in the time to learn it, then leave game design to people that aren't lazy.
Name:
Anonymous2007-07-05 17:39 ID:HbTim302
Anyone have a link to that 3D Asteroids game done in BBCode? I think it was posted here.
Name:
Anonymous2007-07-05 17:46 ID:xGUOLVqd
>>8
Sorry if you didn't get what you wanted but my guess is that you didn't even look because BBCode is basically the norm for programming things like games and operating systems. Try capitalizing the T in "tutorials"? I'm sorry, I really don't know how you didn't get anything.
I'll write you a tutorial on how to create a basic Halo-type game once I have the time (about to eat dinner now).
Good luck!
Name:
Anonymous2007-07-05 18:39 ID:WP5Qi7Tt
>>8
Guess what would happen if information on the BBCode were easily available ?
With BBCode, you can develop a whole operating system without design, just programming. And it doesn't take more than two days.
If such power were available to everybody, the IT industry would crash and every single men and women would achieve Satori in one week. The whole human race would forget to eat, drink and sleep because they would be in a constant meditation, contemplating the deepest mysteries of functionnal programming, and the extinction of the human race would be a matter of weeks.
DarkBasic I heard works good for games.
Or to start to see if you even have the patience, GameMaker.
Name:
Anonymous2007-07-09 7:54 ID:8Q8grqnN
BBCode is awesome, but hard to find documentation due to egoist programmers. I suggest using html, you can make awesome mmorpg's in a matter of weeks due to implemented network support.
XHTML is ENTERPRISE XML. It's the same shit, only with anal restrictions so that you can parse it with ENTERPRISE XML utilities and do the kind of shit you do with ENTERPRISE XML.
You're right. Fuck standards. Let's all just dick around and see what happens.
Name:
Anonymous2007-07-09 12:40 ID:i+Y1kt6W
>>19
HTML 4 is a standard, and HTML 5 is about to be a standard.
Name:
Anonymous2007-07-09 14:46 ID:NH54ZpS1
w3c recommendations are not standards.
Name:
Anonymous2007-07-09 18:49 ID:tDA6H3QG
I don't give a shit about XHTML. It's like HTML, with more enterprise.
Name:
Anonymous2007-07-09 20:41 ID:v6NaRkST
HTML is not touring complete. XHTML is a touring-complete object oriented extension to HTML.
Name:
Anonymous2007-07-10 3:59 ID:AK+bgAld
>>20
The point is that HTML allows for people to diverge from that standard. Completely invalid syntax doesn't even produce an error message.
Name:
Anonymous2007-07-10 5:48 ID:Uk5nCkCK
>>24
The language is defined as such. It doesn't have to fail. However, behaviour is unspecified, and doing shit is still illegal, so I don't see much of a problem. Either way, XHTML (and most versions/proposals of HTML) suck and are flawed for other reasons, such as stupid restrictions on where to put STYLE and LINK tags (which bite for complex application frameworks), case-sensitivity (lol XML), etc.
Name:
Anonymous2007-07-10 5:54 ID:AK+bgAld
>>25 such as stupid restrictions on where to put STYLE and LINK tags (which bite for complex application frameworks), case-sensitivity (lol XML), etc.
Well, that's just like, your opinion, man. (lol complex application frameworks)
Name:
Anonymous2009-01-14 14:21
Troll detected.
Name:
Anonymous2009-03-06 12:06
Design patterns are stupid Labor is in state of being saged into oblivion.
>>22 I don't give a shit about XHTML. It's like HTML, with more enterprise.
It's HTML without legacy bullshit, with added consistency. It's the opposite of enterprise.
>>47
All XHTML is (at least 1.0 anyway) is just HTML 4.01 reformulated in XML, that's it. It's nothing more than just a bandwagon that people jump on to appear "cutting edge". HTML 5.0/XHTML 5.0 is going to be the true major revision.