>>35
Surely that is enough?
Yes, you came up with a working approach on your god damn fourth attempt. Now let's see if the implementation complexity is as good as the guru, who has been out of the labyrinth for ages, and is now envisioning algorithms for self-reprogrammable labyrinth creator machines.
high-level abstraction and low-level optimization
The later is often opposite to the former, and in the cases where it's not opposite, it has a minimal impact.
I know how to organize a program so I don't have to waste time searching and sorting every cycle.
I don't waste time searching and sorting every cycle, because I don't actually write any programs in a computer. All the processes and every possible alternative occur in my mind instantly, without iteration, and their result is yielded in constant time in a generic expression I need not simplify.
Just because I write optimized C when I need that extra little boost doesn't mean I suck at programming in general.
What do you use when you don't "need that extra little boost" nobody needs?
And he does it without attaching any spiritual nonsense or cult-like militancy to it.
Okay, hint: I hope you realize I'm trolling you with this Satori meme, do you? I believe in what I've said, minus the spirituality.