How did you achieve Satori?
1
Name:
Anonymous
2007-07-03 16:31
ID:mVgL6s/2
How did you achieve Satori? Post the direct line of evolution towards Satori, from the first programming language you learnt, towards Satori, without extra branches. Exclude dialects.
Basic → C → Perl → PHP → Python → Lisp → Satori
41
Name:
Anonymous
2007-07-04 20:39
ID:ONzKxEiB
HTML is most certainly a language. The thing about it, though, is it's neither turing complete nor touring complete. This is why many people don't regard it as programming.
Now, XHTML is touring complete, but it's still not turing complete...
42
Name:
Anonymous
2007-07-04 20:46
ID:G8lKOj+B
SICP IS FOR BEGINNERS
43
Name:
Anonymous
2007-07-05 0:25
ID:lTY8IUfe
all I ever wanted, all I ever needed, is here in ML
44
Name:
Anonymous
2009-03-06 7:13
The 2 x world there were numerous bugs having to introduce more primitives or making environments associative lists No eval is necessary because one could contribute to without spending months trying to infiltrate the community and find the whitesheet for.
45
Name:
Anonymous
2009-09-19 1:10
Lain.
46
Name:
Anonymous
2009-09-19 1:10
Lain.
47
Name:
Anonymous
2009-09-19 1:11
Lain.
48
Name:
Anonymous
2009-09-19 1:11
Lain.
49
Name:
Anonymous
2010-09-26 19:03
Logo → Pascal → Visual Basic → Bash → Python → Javascript → C → Sepples → PHP → x86-64 asm → x86-32 asm → Lua → ?
50
Name:
Anonymous
2010-09-26 19:24
Esophagus-Stomach-Intestines-Anus -Satori
51
Name:
Anonymous
2010-09-26 19:27
Basic → Cobol → Clipper → C → C++ → Object Pascal → VB → Delphi → Perl → Perl6 → ?
52
Name:
Anonymous
2010-09-26 23:58
BASIC → Pascal → Hypertalk → C++ → Ruby → Python → Lisp → C → Haskell → ?
53
Name:
Anonymous
2010-09-27 2:15
Delphi → C → C++ → VB.Net → Object Pascal(Properly) → Oberon-2 → Satori
I understand what computer programs truly are now. Not what they are practically, but their composition. It's beautiful
54
Name:
Anonymous
2010-09-27 3:45
SICP → Satori
Looks Simple, Doesn't It?
55
Name:
Anonymous
2010-09-27 4:03
C++ → C → Perl → Perl 6
Wasn't hard
56
Name:
Anonymous
2010-09-27 4:09
QuickBasic → C → PHP → Python → Scheme → Satori
Other languages that I've fucked with the middle of it for any number of reasons but didn't help at all: Visual Basic, Pascal, Java, Perl
57
Name:
Anonymous
2010-09-27 4:21
Java → PHP → C → C++ → Prolog → Haskell → C# → Python → ?
58
Name:
Anonymous
2010-09-27 4:32
BASIC* Perl → SICP
↓ ↑
C++ → C → (Action|Java)Script
*duh
59
Name:
Anonymous
2010-09-27 5:11
Basic → Pascal → C → x86 Assembly → C++ → MIPS RISC aka Power(PC) assembly → Python/FIOC → SML → Lisp → Scheme → Satori → C99 → x86-64 and SSE2/3/4 assembly → ARM assembly → C++0x → ???
Satori isn't the final destination. It's a new beginning.
60
Name:
Anonymous
2010-09-27 5:36
>>53
Oberon-2
U MENA PASCAL
61
Name:
Anonymous
2010-09-27 6:45
HORRIBLE ZZT Code
HTML (not a programming language per se)
Python
C
C++
Java
C#
C
Scheme
Python
No Satori yet
62
Name:
Anonymous
2010-09-27 9:30
→ Satori
63
Name:
Anonymous
2010-09-27 10:19
Exclude dialects.
#include <dialects>
TI-99 BASIC → C64 BASIC → Amiga BASIC → Amiga C → 6502 Asm → 68000 Asm (briefly) → DOS → QBASIC → Borland Turbo C → Intel 80386 Asm → Whatever the Borland C++ compiler was called before C++ Builder (early 90s) → Unix → gcc → Visual Studio (early version) → MASM → Lisp → Pentium Asm → MMX → Perl → Various scripting languages → BNF parsers → Creating languages → BBC ode
64
Name:
Anonymous
2010-09-27 10:38
Python → C++ → x86 assembly → ANSI C
65
Name:
Anonymous
2010-09-27 11:11
Lisp → Lisp → Lisp → Lisp → Lisp → Lisp → Lisp → Lisp → Lisp → Lisp → Lisp → Lisp → Lisp → Lisp → Lisp → Lisp → Lisp → Lisp → Lisp → Lisp → Lisp → Lisp → Lisp → Lisp → Lisp → Lisp → Lisp → Lisp → Lisp → Lisp → Lisp → Lisp → Lisp → Lisp → Lisp → Lisp → Lisp → Lisp → Lisp → Lisp → Lisp → Lisp → Lisp → Lisp → Lisp → Lisp → Lisp → Lisp → Lisp → Lisp → Lisp → Lisp → Lisp → Lisp → Lisp → Lisp → Lisp → Lisp → Lisp → Lisp → Lisp → Lisp → Lisp → Lisp → Lisp → Lisp → Lisp → Lisp → Lisp → Lisp → Lisp → Lisp → Lisp → Lisp → Lisp → Lisp → Lisp → Lisp → Lisp → Lisp → Lisp → Lisp → Lisp → Lisp → Lisp → Lisp → Lisp → Lisp → Lisp → Lisp → Lisp → Lisp → Lisp → Lisp → Lisp → Lisp → Lisp → Lisp → Lisp → Lisp → Lisp → Lisp → Lisp → Lisp → Lisp → Lisp → Lisp → Lisp → Lisp → Lisp → Lisp → Lisp → Lisp → Lisp → Lisp → Lisp → Lisp → Lisp → Lisp → Lisp → Lisp → Lisp → Lisp → Lisp → Lisp → Lisp → Lisp → Lisp → Lisp → Lisp → Lisp → Lisp → Lisp → Lisp → Lisp → Lisp → Lisp → Lisp → Lisp → Lisp → Lisp → Lisp → Lisp → Lisp → Lisp → Lisp → Lisp → Lisp → Lisp → Lisp → Lisp → Lisp → Lisp → Lisp → Lisp → Lisp → Lisp → Lisp → Lisp → Lisp → Lisp → Lisp → Lisp → Lisp → Lisp → Lisp → Lisp → Lisp → Lisp → Lisp → Lisp → Lisp → Lisp → Lisp → Lisp → Lisp → Lisp → Lisp → Lisp → Lisp → Lisp → Lisp → Lisp → Lisp → Lisp → Lisp → Lisp → Lisp → Lisp → Lisp → Lisp → Lisp → Lisp → Lisp → Lisp → Lisp → Lisp → Lisp → Lisp → Lisp → Lisp → Lisp → Lisp → Lisp → Lisp → Lisp → Lisp → Lisp → Lisp → Lisp → Lisp → Lisp → Lisp → Lisp → Lisp → Lisp → Lisp → Lisp → Lisp → Lisp → Lisp → Lisp → Lisp → Lisp → Lisp → Lisp → Lisp → Lisp → Lisp → Lisp → Lisp → Lisp → Lisp → Lisp → Lisp → Lisp → Lisp → Lisp → Lisp → Lisp → Lisp → Lisp → Lisp → Lisp → Lisp → Lisp → Lisp → Lisp → Lisp → Lisp → Lisp → Lisp → Lisp → Lisp →#SEGMENTATION FAULT
66
Name:
Anonymous
2010-09-27 11:18
Satori → C#
67
Name:
Anonymous
2010-09-27 11:43
68
Name:
Anonymous
2010-09-27 12:25
>>65
Scheme has tail recursion, so this would not happen in scheme.
69
Name:
Anonymous
2010-09-27 12:39
Nyan nyan nyan nyan ni hao nyan → Satori
70
Name:
Anonymous
2010-09-27 12:39
>>68
my
anus has tail recursion
71
Name:
Anonymous
2010-09-27 13:04
72
Name:
Anonymous
2010-09-27 13:15
>>68
And so does every CL implementation worth it's salt.
73
Name:
Anonymous
2010-09-27 13:32
74
Name:
Anonymous
2010-09-27 15:32
C → C++ → TrainzScript → Pythong → PHP → C# → Satori
75
Name:
Anonymous
2010-09-27 15:41
You can never achieve satori, fools.
You can only try for the rest of your lives.
76
Name:
Anonymous
2010-09-27 16:45
I invited The Sussman's /prog/ snake into my anus.
77
Name:
Anonymous
2010-09-27 18:07
Kisume → Yamame → Parsee → Yuugi → Satori
78
Name:
Anonymous
2010-09-27 18:30
→
This thread contains some of the weirdest type signatures I've ever seen.
79
Name:
Anonymous
2010-09-27 19:04
>>60
No sir. Actually more like Oberon-07. Not that it matters a lot
Niklaus Wirth would be proud though. I'm implementing a compiler as we speak. He might sound arrogant in interviews, but damn, now I see what he means
All existing languages are typically moving towards syntax complexity; but most forget that they can too easily add syntax complexity at the cost of syntax complicacy
Newer Posts