Return Styles: Pseud0ch, Terminal, Valhalla, NES, Geocities, Blue Moon.

Pages: 1-

Which is better?

Name: Anonymous 2007-06-20 16:43 ID:OKrZzwDv

Gtk# or Qt?

Name: Anonymous 2007-06-20 17:05 ID:Heaven

GTK is better but awful to code in

Name: Anonymous 2007-06-20 17:24 ID:Heaven

PyGtk is better, and not awful to code in.

Name: EXPERT BBCODE PROGRAMMER 2007-06-20 17:50 ID:5lJgzgio

Both suck equally since the desktop is dead. Make an AJAX web 2.0 app with Ruby on Rails instead.

Name: Anonymous 2007-06-20 17:58 ID:Sr5IbL6S

Qt has good object orientation.

Name: Anonymous 2007-06-20 18:34 ID:cRUQCB5M

Name: Anonymous 2007-06-20 18:45 ID:0zEooWh5

>>6
tl;dr: phooey

Name: Anonymous 2007-06-20 19:18 ID:Heaven

X

Name: Anonymous 2007-06-20 21:19 ID:Heaven

Cocoa

Name: Anonymous 2007-06-21 3:14 ID:pP2HzpNL

GTK. With C.

Name: Anonymous 2007-06-21 3:54 ID:RmZmYR8A

Qt baby. Rock solid with great tools.

Name: Anonymous 2007-06-21 4:20 ID:iDijUL3G

Windows API lol

Name: Anonymous 2007-06-21 4:20 ID:Ks0h8YV0

>>9
truth.

Name: Anonymous 2007-06-21 4:33 ID:rSfmtyAw

>>9,13
Cocao isn't even a real programming language. SICP FTW

Name: Anonymous 2007-06-21 5:40 ID:srSVJRV5

CreateWindow(NULL, NULL, NULL, NULL, NULL, NULL, NULL, NULL, NULL, NULL, NULL, NULL, NULL, NULL, NULL, NULL, NULL, NULL, NULL, NULL, NULL, NULL, NULL, NULL, NULL, NULL, NULL, NULL, NULL, NULL, NULL, NULL, NULL, NULL, NULL, NULL, NULL, NULL, NULL, NULL, NULL, NULL, NULL, NULL, NULL, NULL, NULL, NULL, NULL, NULL, NULL, NULL, NULL, NULL, NULL, NULL, NULL, NULL, NULL, NULL, NULL, NULL, NULL, NULL, NULL, NULL, NULL, NULL, NULL, NULL, NULL, NULL, NULL, NULL, NULL, NULL, NULL, NULL, NULL, NULL, NULL, NULL, NULL, NULL, NULL, NULL, NULL, NULL, NULL, NULL, NULL, NULL, NULL, NULL, NULL, NULL, NULL, NULL, NULL, NULL, NULL, NULL, NULL, NULL, NULL, NULL, NULL, NULL, NULL, NULL, NULL, NULL, NULL, NULL, NULL, NULL, NULL, NULL, NULL, NULL, NULL, NULL, NULL, NULL, NULL, NULL, NULL, NULL, NULL, NULL, NULL, NULL, NULL, NULL, NULL, NULL, NULL, NULL, NULL, NULL, NULL, NULL, NULL, NULL, NULL, NULL, NULL, NULL, NULL, NULL, NULL, NULL, NULL, NULL, NULL, NULL, NULL, NULL, NULL, NULL, NULL, NULL, NULL, NULL, NULL, NULL, NULL, NULL, NULL, NULL, NULL, NULL, NULL, NULL, NULL, NULL, NULL, NULL, NULL, NULL, NULL, NULL, NULL, NULL)

Name: Anonymous 2007-06-21 7:48 ID:dTF+kO2Q

Cocoa. There are even pretty full-featured bindings for Haskell and Python.

Name: Anonymous 2007-06-21 8:13 ID:Ks0h8YV0

>>16
the haskell bindings fail, and wrt. python.. one word.

Name: Anonymous 2007-06-21 8:16 ID:Heaven

>>17
The one word being '>>17 is an enormous faggot'? Oh wait, that's more than one word.

Name: Anonymous 2007-06-21 8:30 ID:Ks0h8YV0

>>18
one word, FORCED INDENTATION OF THE CODE

the haskell bindings fail e.g. DO NOT EVEN FUCKING RUN
and python fails whether or not the cocoa bindings work

Name: Anonymous 2007-06-21 8:47 ID:Heaven

>>19
The latest release is ancient. You need to fetch the current version from CVS.

Name: Anonymous 2007-06-21 8:50 ID:yGWn/4HJ

>>19
Yeah, if you're going to use Cocoa, use Objective-C.  The work arounds to use the multi-part method names in other languages suck.  Or if you are an expert programmer, use OBJECTIVE-C++.

Name: Anonymous 2007-06-21 8:56 ID:Ks0h8YV0

>>21
objective C++ is somthing you should only ever use if you need to glue to a C++ library.

>>20
well maybe ill try that you stupid fuck

Name: Anonymous 2007-06-21 9:25 ID:z8ZmBSvA

Use Objective BBCode.

Name: Anonymous 2009-01-14 14:00

FIOC

Name: Anonymous 2011-02-04 16:05

Name: Anonymous 2011-02-04 18:31

Don't change these.
Name: Email:
Entire Thread Thread List