Language | Typed | Type Safe | Fundamental Data type | syntax | paradaigms
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
C | yes | no (lol) | bytes | FORTRAN | imperative
Lisp | dynamic | yes | cons | Lisp | all
Haskell | static | very | ? | HASKELLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLL
Name:
Anonymous2007-06-12 22:49 ID:fdI2dwkn
lisp is typesafe?
Name:
Anonymous2007-06-13 1:11 ID:P5e5teOa
BBcode | no | N/A | strings | HTML | none
Name:
Anonymous2007-06-13 2:46 ID:FPsO+02T
>>1
why would you lol at C not being type safe? I mean, a comp is a logic engine and trying to say an apple is an orange in a non spoon feeding programming language... well... what can I say?
Name:
Anonymous2007-06-13 3:36 ID:naAHbHx6
ASM | no | hell no | bytes | mnemonic | roll your own
BASIC | yes | yes | numeric and string | FORTRAN | imperative
Name:
Anonymous2007-06-13 4:24 ID:Dj+uoU/d
Python | QUACK | yes | object | FORCED IND | all
Name:
Anonymous2007-06-13 7:52 ID:NEoGwHCC
>>7
basic doesn't have FORTRAN like syntax you nerd.
LOLCODE | YA RLY | NO WAI | CHEEZBURGER | FORTRAN | LOL
Name:
Anonymous2007-06-14 0:18 ID:tnxRbBYm
i'd say lolcode borrows more from cobol
Name:
Anonymous2009-03-06 6:52
The Perl fanboy not the guy who has gotten insane errors with Gentoo who claimed to be a girl giving advice here first of all Java mechanisms and of its interaction with the processor or many does the work Interpreted.