this sounds like such a n00b but i've finally understood c and now i don't know what to do, to clarify i work with other things and only program as a hobby so it's not like my life depends on it but as a hobby right now it's kinda dead
so i ask you to give suggestions to someone who wants to get more experience in c and has recently learned to understand the language
Name:
Anonymous2007-05-19 12:19 ID:4OdiOt92
read linux kernel
Name:
Anonymous2007-05-19 12:20 ID:eG54H3yo
Do you really want to get more experience in just C or more experience in programming?
Name:
Anonymous2007-05-19 12:25 ID:5H2CucMQ
I have no clue what you just said.
Name:
Anonymous2007-05-19 16:22 ID:J51780ky
>>3
Is that even relevant, or is it just your way of telling the OP to read SICP?
Make a program to reach out over the internets and stab someone in the face.
In reality, you could google for "programming challenges". Or, learn how socket programming works - I've met various people who've found writing their own network chat programs extremely useful in their development.
We don't need more people reinventing the wheel than we already have.
Name:
Anonymous2007-05-20 4:07 ID:mxSLbu7q
well actually reinventing the wheel is exactly what you could do as an exercise, i've seriously considered an ircd
i've settled on finishing my network chess game i started earlier this year, instead of using curses i'll use sdl to make it work, after that i'll hopefully have some new valid ideas or i'll just write another ircd
Already defined by shitty posts Makes perfect sense to me and me only And only use one window at a time so afterwards the program is buggy because an else always applies to the link to your new EXPERT PROGRAMMER This is an an industrial strength monadic parser combinator library for Haskell.
Bringing /prog/ back to its people
All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy
All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy
All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy
All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy
All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy
All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy
All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy
All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy
All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy
All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy
All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy
All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy
All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy
Infinity is also used to describe infinite series:
Name:
Anonymous2013-09-01 0:40
Mathematical topics typically emerge and evolve through interactions among many researchers. Set theory, however, was founded by a single paper in 1874 by Georg Cantor: "On a Characteristic Property of All Real Algebraic Numbers".
Name:
Anonymous2013-09-01 1:26
An inner model of Zermelo–Fraenkel set theory (ZF) is a transitive class that includes all the ordinals and satisfies all the axioms of ZF. The canonical example is the constructible universe L developed by Gödel. One reason that the study of inner models is of interest is that it can be used to prove consistency results. For example, it can be shown that regardless of whether a model V of ZF satisfies the continuum hypothesis or the axiom of choice, the inner model L constructed inside the original model will satisfy both the generalized continuum hypothesis and the axiom of choice. Thus the assumption that ZF is consistent (has at least one model) implies that ZF together with these two principles is consistent.
Name:
Anonymous2013-09-01 2:11
There are many other equivalent statements of the axiom of choice. These are equivalent in the sense that, in the presence of other basic axioms of set theory, they imply the axiom of choice and are implied by it.
Name:
Anonymous2013-09-01 2:56
One argument given in favor of using the axiom of choice is that it is convenient to use it because it allows one to prove some simplifying propositions that otherwise could not be proved. Many theorems which are provable using choice are of an elegant general character: every ideal in a ring is contained in a maximal ideal, every vector space has a basis, and every product of compact spaces is compact. Without the axiom of choice, these theorems may not hold for mathematical objects of large cardinality.