tru or fals

>>2 is so true he makes 1 look false

>>1 is so false he makes 2 look true

!

>>2
FAIL.

>>1
I found humorous that the first 2 letters of your tripcode where 0 and 1

>>5
0 and 1 are not letters.

>>1
I like your ID, sir.

>>5-6
'O' is a letter. Further, '0' (ASCII 0x4F) and 'O' (ASCII 0x30) are quite different.

>>8
Also, tripcode and ID are different.

>>9
Also, they are not the first two characters.

>>10
Yes they are.

$ time -h trip ^01
EExn*BL| = 01HsV72vBg
|1M#+[ ] = 01/.OQwlaU
Tz9B3OaZ = 015Ex4Ru7U
W7tar~+w = 014ynj5PHk
Q6E: g#j = 01kL.azh1E
n0km708y = 01vO2H/5k6
kHmziz7P = 01KOGnUSZc
m8d)qx]  = 0193DGONIY
*llMmvS- = 01Yy297pLw
Key:i8V* = 01tJTvAjpg
UQLjOXN! = 0170BKSZW6
lhL[$r*: = 01Qf14v/Bo
V9W*)RkT = 01zdybzYW.
%rWdh2{L = 01q2T0WRDQ
9m.m_~8Z = 01oQHAqIfE
uaDkhKW* = 01n5AT9JW.
|1gE-Y(* = 01pfzmlqHE
:5/763BE = 01kY1M56CM
CdXq4H.d = 01/XGjCHs.
^Ctime: command terminated abnormally
        6.65s real              2.20s user              0.01s sys

>>12
Fifanit lafeli.

>>13
Etaoin shrdlu.

% grep \ 01Bua 64x2 64x3 64x4

No matches :'(  (for all tripcodes of lengths 2-4)

Are there rainbow tables for tripcodes anywhere?

>>12
Requesting utility "trip"

>>17
http://hotaru.thinkindifferent.net/fasttrip-regex.tar.bz2
or if you don't need/want regex support: http://hotaru.thinkindifferent.net/fasttrip.tar.bz2

If you're running OS X on PPC (and maybe Intel, I dunno), especially on a multiprocessor system, TripperX is much faster. As in, hundreds of thousands of tripcodes per second.

>>19
did you try redirecting output to a file? on freebsd and linux it runs a much faster if it's not outputting to the horribly slow console.

if you want something really fast, check out 4brute-johnbs (4brute with bitslice des code from john the ripper)...
it does 1211kcps on my 1.6GHz turion laptop (running freebsd amd64, using the 128-bit sse2 assembly code from jtr)...

also, i'm working on a multithreaded version of it, which should help on multiprocessor systems. i'm not in any hurry tho, since i don't have any multiprocessor systems to run it on.

as it is it does about 70,000 tripcodes per second on the machine i'm using now (2.8GHz pentium 4, windows xp).

>>20
If you're trying to dump thousands of tripcodes to the console, that's just useless. Pipe it to grep or something.
Intel assembly code is useless to me.

>>21
70k on a nearly 3 GHz system?! Fail. TripperX runs about 150-200k trips a second on my 1.67 GHz PowerBook with an exact tripcode to search for, and somewhere around 80-90k with a moderately complex regex search pattern.

Intel assembly code is useless to me.
jtr has assembly code for ppc, too.

>70k on a nearly 3 GHz system?!
running windows. with 5 users logged on. three of them with aim running, and two with all kinds of flash and java stuff running.

150-200k trips a second
real time or cpu time?
i'm using real time, since there's no easy way that i know of to measure how much cpu time a process uses on windows.

around 80-90k with a moderately complex regex search pattern.
that's not all that much more than 70k...

If you're going to cite numbers, at least get rid of all that other garbage you're running so they're meaningful.

real time or cpu time?
Wall clock.

that's not all that much more than 70k...
No, not if we're running with equal CPUs. However, your computer is significantly faster, so you should be getting much better performance out of it.


I hacked a TripperX-ish status message into fastttrip:

--- trip.c.orig 2007-04-29 18:18:27.000000000 -0400
+++ trip.c      2007-05-12 05:17:07.000000000 -0400
@@ -34,6 +34,8 @@
  char tripc[]=" !#$%()*+-./0123456789:;=?ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ[\\]^_`abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz{|}~&";
  char saltc[]="./0123456789ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZabcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz";
  register char i,scase=0,*searchstring;
+ unsigned n=500000,nn=0;
+ time_t start=time(0);
  if(argc>1)
  {
   if(argc>2&&!strcmp(argv[1],"-c"))
@@ -55,6 +57,12 @@
  char name[11]={0};
  while(1)
  {
+  if (!--n)
+  {
+   n=500000;
+   nn+=n;
+   fprintf(stderr,"%d tripcodes searched (%f/sec)\n",nn,((double)nn)/(time(NULL)-start));
+  }
   trip[0]=tripc[rand()%88];
   salt[0]=saltc[rand()%64];
   salt[1]=saltc[rand()%64];

I'm getting 170,000 random tripcodes per second with my code using openssl on a P4... I'd love to try hooking it up to John The Ripper's DES-bs... can someone direct me to 4brute-johnbs so I steal some of its glue?

oh snap! it's you again!... n/m. this can't be the place to ask either. :(

You dishonourable failures.

test

dude i swear the god i'm the OP
I'm >>1,5 ... i remember it. h0 shit.

i thkn the tripcode was #whatever... testing

>>30
okay maybe not.. idont remmeber the tripcode i used

>>31
your tripcode sucks, fag.

lolwut

Vim

Bringing /prog/ back to its people
All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy
All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy
All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy
All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy
All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy
All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy
All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy
All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy
All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy
All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy
All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy
All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy
All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy
All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy
All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy
All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy
All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy
All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy
All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy
All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy