Return Styles: Pseud0ch, Terminal, Valhalla, NES, Geocities, Blue Moon.

Pages: 1-

<=>

Name: Anonymous 2007-04-11 10:03 ID:oipW5bkJ

One operator, <=>, everything over.

Name: Anonymous 2007-04-11 10:09 ID:eVJlIghg

I don't know, I'm partial to Haskell's => operator

Name: Anonymous 2007-04-11 10:19 ID:5UcSHQwN

IF U WERE KILLED TOMORROW, I WOULDNT GO 2 UR FUNERAL CUZ ID B N JAIL 4 KILLIN DA NIGGA THAT KILLED U!
..... , ,_____________________
..... / `---___________----_____|]
...../_==o;;;;;;;;_______|
.... / ______|
.....), _(__) /
....// (..) ), ----"
...//___//
..//___//
.//___//

WE TRUE HOMIES
WE RIDE TOGETHER
WE DIE TOGETHER
send this GUN to every thread you care about including this one if you care. C how many times you get this, if you get 13 your A TRUE HOMIE

Name: Anonymous 2007-04-11 10:26 ID:vO/pp78x

>>2
C's => operator is obviously superior.

Name: Anonymous 2007-04-11 11:40 ID:fmFdrz7D

>>2
>>4
O-M-G U BAKAS ITS >= !!

Name: Anonymous 2007-04-11 12:08 ID:m9GNnpoM

Haskell has a => operator. It defines context.

Name: Anonymous 2007-04-11 12:25 ID:582OV1Dm

MySQL has a NULL-safe comparison operator <=> .

SELECT 1 = 1 yields 1
SELECT 1 = 0 yields 0
SELECT 1 = NULL yields NULL (stupid SQL)
SELECT 1 <=> NULL yields 0
SELECT NULL <=> NULL yields 1
SELECT 1 / 0 yields NULL (it should yield INFINITE)

Name: Anonymous 2007-04-11 13:09 ID:eVJlIghg

>>7
| SELECT 1 / 0 yields NULL (it should yield INFINITE)

Hey moron, my name is second grade math.

Name: Anonymous 2007-04-11 13:10 ID:m9GNnpoM

>>8
I THINK YOU SHOULD PARTICIPATE IN THE IEEE 754 COMMITTEE.

Name: Anonymous 2007-04-11 13:11 ID:aBNyxm6y

8==D~

Am I doing it right?

Name: Anonymous 2007-04-11 13:31 ID:les8dQDl

Server: Msg 8134, Level 16, State 1, Line 1
Divide by zero error encountered.

Name: Anonymous 2007-04-11 14:53 ID:eVJlIghg

>>7
MySql thinks you can evaluate divide by zero to null
Poster thinks you can evaluate divide by zero to Infinity

Both are equally worthless.

Name: Anonymous 2007-04-11 15:02 ID:Heaven

>>12
Please refer to >>9

Name: Anonymous 2007-04-12 5:25 ID:bioMD/oJ

>>8-13
Please refer to /sci before getting trolled over 1/0 so easily

Name: Anonymous 2007-04-12 10:45 ID:j9vx/e9R

>>12
if you are so smart what is 1/0?
faggot

Name: Anonymous 2007-04-12 11:24 ID:G8oV9GMe

1/0 != faggot

Name: Anonymous 2007-04-12 11:45 ID:2+9ilRZe

mysql> select pow(0,-1) = 1/0;
+-----------------+
| pow(0,-1) = 1/0 |
+-----------------+
|            NULL |
+-----------------+
1 row in set (0.01 sec)

mysql> select pow(0,-1) <=> 1/0;
+-------------------+
| pow(0,-1) <=> 1/0 |
+-------------------+
|                 0 |
+-------------------+
1 row in set (0.01 sec)


FAILURE.

Name: Anonymous 2007-04-12 11:55 ID:G8oV9GMe

That is why mysql fails it hard. A proper DBMS like Microsoft SQL Server complains when you try to do impossible mathematical operations:


C:\> osql -S TEST -E
1> select power(0,-1)
2> go
Msg 8134, Level 16, State 1, Server TEST, Line 1
Divide by zero error encountered.
1> select 1/0
2> go
Msg 8134, Level 16, State 1, Server TEST, Line 1
Divide by zero error encountered.

Name: Anonymous 2007-04-12 12:07 ID:Heaven

mysql> select pow(0,-1)&pow(0,-1);
+---------------------+
| pow(0,-1)&pow(0,-1) |
+---------------------+
| 9223372036854775808 |
+---------------------+
1 row in set (0.01 sec)

Name: Anonymous 2007-04-12 12:28 ID:G8oV9GMe

>>19

WTF

Name: Anonymous 2007-04-12 14:07 ID:Cjry/f1u

Apart from not being funny, even in the random sense that you were going for which was so obviously predictable, I also couldn't follow it. I didn't make sense at for pretty much most of the beginning and only started to near the end. However, this is the point where I really didn't give shit what you wrote because an idiot who can barely make coherent thoughts under absolutely no pressure nor time constraints at all must be fuckin retarded.

I hope for your sake that when you wrote this someone had a fuckin gun to your head because then that would be an excuse for writing that piece of shit garbage that you posted. But even then that would mean that someone would want you to write that. So much so that they actually put a gun to your head. And who would want you write meaningless garbage that isn't even remotely funny and a waste of time..... a conundrum! I'll start working on that; you go play with some blocks or something.  

Name: Anonymous 2007-04-13 9:40 ID:eJ83xDaF

>>15
Disregard that, I suck cocks

Name: Anonymous 2007-04-13 10:51 ID:Heaven

1/0 = 0**-1 because 1/x = x**-1.
0**-1 = (0**-1) & (0**-1) because x&x=x.
(0**-1) & (0**-1) = 9223372036854775808 because mysql says so.

Name: Anonymous 2007-10-02 16:57 ID:WoMaLBVn

WELCOME TO THE PASTBITCH FUCKING BUMP

Name: Anonymous 2007-10-02 17:23 ID:5XHbE1js

1/0 DOESN'T EXIST THAT'S WHY YOU CAN'T DIVIDE BY ZERO(YES, LISTEN TO THE CALCULATOR SOMETIMES) SAME FOR THE SQUARE ROOT OF A NEGATIVE NUMBER AND THE SQUARE ROOT OF 2 AND A LOT OF OTHER FAGGOT NUMBERS(SOME FAGGOTS WOULD PRETEND IT DOES EXIST BY SAYING IT'S ABOUT 1.41 BUT THEORICALLY SPEAKING YOU CAN'T SOLVE X*X = 2 BECAUSE X HAS NO EXACT VALUE THAT WOULD EXACTLY GIVE 2 EVEN THOUGH THE ANSWER IS 2+10^-100000000000), THEREFORE YOURE ALL WRONG, THE ANSWER IS NOT NULL, NOT ``OH SHI-" AND OBVIOUSLY NOT INFINITE

GB2/SCI

Name: Anonymous 2007-10-02 17:26 ID:Heaven

>>25
OKAY YOU FUQIN ANGERED AN EXPERT PROGRAMMER
GODFUCKIGNDAMN
FIRST OF ALL, YOU DONT FUQIN KNOW WHAT A MAN PAGE IS
SECONDLY, THIS IS /prog/ DO NOT DEMAND USEFUL ANSWERS THE WAY YOU WANT THEM TO BE
THIRDLY PROGRAMMING IS ALL ABOUT PHILOSOPHY AND ``ABSTRACT BULLSHITE'' THAT YOU WILL NEVER COMPREHEND
AND FUQIN LASTLY, FUCK OFF WITH YOUR BULLSHYT
EVERYTHING HAS ALREADY BEEN ANSWERED IN
the past

Name: Anonymous 2007-10-02 19:24 ID:3WFITvl1

>>26
Ctrl-C + Ctrl-V: This is apparently the official language of 4chan.

Name: Anonymous 2007-10-02 20:27 ID:upswcaze

>>27
I'm more familiar with the select->middle click dialect.

Name: Anonymous 2007-10-02 20:39 ID:6UQLAAQS

>>28
Faggot

Name: Anonymous 2007-10-02 21:01 ID:upswcaze

>>29
CUA is gay.

Name: Anonymous 2007-10-03 5:27

>>30
YUO IS GAY

Name: Anonymous 2007-10-03 5:56

There's a <=> word in factor.

Name: Anonymous 2009-01-14 14:37

SAGESAGESAGE

Name: Anonymous 2010-12-27 19:43

Name: Anonymous 2012-03-25 10:18

All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy

All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy

All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy

All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy

All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy

All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy

Name: Sgt.Kabu騈⇀kiman㨿쭸 2012-05-29 0:23

Bringing /prog/ back to its people
All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy
All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy
All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy
All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy
All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy
All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy
All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy
All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy
All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy
All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy
All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy
All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy
All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy
All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy
All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy
All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy
All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy
All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy

Don't change these.
Name: Email:
Entire Thread Thread List