Return Styles: Pseud0ch, Terminal, Valhalla, NES, Geocities, Blue Moon.

Pages: 1-4041-

Too bad C is slow as fuck.

Name: Anonymous 2007-02-25 6:12 ID:pp/hn/qf

C on fails, am I rite?

Name: Anonymous 2007-02-25 6:35 ID:foC5wA/5

u r rite

Name: Anonymous 2007-02-25 7:20 ID:bzdSdm1+

java is speed king

Name: Anonymous 2007-02-25 10:57 ID:BYzBjkGe

The lower the level of abstraction the slower your code will be. It's in every major computer science textbook, just look it up.

Name: Anonymous 2007-02-25 11:16 ID:foC5wA/5

>>4
That's why I write all my programs in QBasic with a Java interpreter!

Name: Anonymous 2007-02-25 12:03 ID:pp/hn/qf

>>5
LOL, enjoy your slow programs!!

I vaguely specify what I want my program to do on a piece of paper -- purely functional and everything is optimized away due to laziness -- the best performance available (except perhaps not even writing it down... mhm).

Name: Anonymous 2007-02-25 18:36 ID:pG7krRKc

my programs are written in ruby, implemented in jython! soo fast.

Name: Anonymous 2007-02-26 3:25 ID:WYXYmHfk

Dude, I turned my computer off. My programs run so much faster now.

Name: Anonymous 2007-02-27 20:21 ID:A6dYPaxX

It's true! The higher the level of abstraction the faster the program will be! But wait a minute. Is a fixed-point real represented in 35 bits integer part, 17 bits mantissa in PL/I the higher level of abstraction, or a "Float" in Ruby? Is a transcedental hypercomplex the higher level of abstraction or a "number"?

Name: Anonymous 2007-02-27 22:10 ID:u4XC83u4

>>9
It's a sandwich. A really tasty sandwich.

Name: Anonymous 2007-02-27 22:13 ID:u3JynJ3Z

I only write machine language

Name: Anonymous 2007-02-28 3:54 ID:YYe8KbJZ

>>4
Forgive my ignorance, but why? Wouldn't having a lower level of abstraction mean it can be better optimised? And - since Java is interpreted by an environment written in C++ wouldn't it necessarily work as fast or slower?

Name: Anonymous 2007-02-28 13:09 ID:NIAYKD/T

>>12
hahaha oh wow

Name: Anonymous 2007-02-28 13:20 ID:P9/FQqxv

>>12
This should be a meme.

Name: Anonymous 2007-02-28 15:27 ID:OWKp+a0B

>>12
In theory, no.

In practice (with heavily biased benchmarks written by Eric S. Redmond), yes.

Name: Anonymous 2007-03-01 17:06 ID:oLSYNRMW

Assembly is faster than C or Java, I believe.

Usually C is faster than Java, but in the lattest benchmarks, in some programs, Java was faster than C (because of JIT, I think?)

Name: Anonymous 2007-03-01 22:41 ID:kBMgtHkE

>>16

All depends on what you are benchmarking.  The VMs are qutie intelligent in their optimizations, and if you are just looking at simple systems, then the VM can generally just compile the processing intensive bits down to machine code - so no real difference between that and a natively compiled language.

Of course, in a larger system, where the VM can't fully wrap its optimizing logic around things, it tends to be more apparent that its not running directly on the hardware.  Add on top of that the fact that most VMs provide a good chunk of additional security checks (which consume processor cycles) and you get a noticably slower program.

And, of course, it all depends on your compiler.  A crap C compiler (or one not properly configured) will spit out poorly optimized code.

Name: Anonymous 2007-03-02 1:31 ID:8E9cKQmY

The VMs are qutie intelligent in their optimization
I'm not sure about that. Almost by definition JIT VMs only do rather easy or simple optimizations that can be done quickly, since they're being done during execution.

How -server handles things I do not know. Probably better, since it's allowed to take its time.

Name: Anonymous 2007-03-02 3:07 ID:rFjtyXmW

Fuck OO. GOTO or GTFO.

Name: Anonymous 2007-03-02 4:15 ID:JS/b/hB6

>>18

True, but Java doesn't just do JIT.  HotSpot does some funky analysis on the bytecode and tries to figure out how to make it faster - if I remember correctly.

Name: Anonymous 2007-03-02 10:15 ID:Heaven

>>20
and fails horribly

Name: Anonymous 2007-03-02 21:50 ID:Ct7ZVTsx

Are you JITing my cock!

Name: Anonymous 2007-03-03 0:00 ID:RLrl8cnh

High-level languages carry more information that help the compiler apply significant optimisations. For example Sisal programs are automatically parallellised by the compiler because the language describes discrete dataflow.
Or APL programs describe matrix operations directly, and the compiler doesn't have to guess that a loop is in fact doing matrix computation.
Etc etc...

Name: Anonymous 2007-03-03 3:51 ID:LSY/dTQu

>>23
OR YOU COULD PROGRAM IT IN ASSEMBLY AND NOT HAVE TO HAVE A RUNTIME ENVIRONMENT SPEND CPU CYCLES DOING YOUR NIGGER WORK FOR YOU.

Name: Anonymous 2007-03-03 8:30 ID:Heaven

assembly and C.
thread over.

Name: Anonymous 2007-03-03 21:10 ID:BoYaTX4N

use a real programming language like SML and you wouldnt come up against these types of problems.

Name: Anonymous 2007-03-04 2:01 ID:Heaven

>>24
These need no runtimes, fagit.

Name: Anonymous 2007-03-07 18:12 ID:3w23+5VX

>>27
that's what he meant, faggot

Name: Anonymous 2007-08-09 19:00 ID:Heaven

1
2

Name: Anonymous 2007-08-09 19:01 ID:Heaven

01
2

Name: Anonymous 2007-08-09 19:01 ID:Heaven

012

Name: Anonymous 2007-08-09 19:02 ID:Heaven

01234

Name: Anonymous 2008-02-02 11:09

>>7
IF U WERE HIDDEN BY A spoiler TAG TOMORROW, I WOULDNT GO 2 UR HOVERING CUZ ID B N DA REPLY BOX TO RITE A RAD BBCODE PROGRAM!
B B c o d e
B B c o d e
[i][u][sup][sub][u][o]B B c o d e/o][/u][/sub][/sup][/u][/i]

WE TRUE BBCODE EXPERTS
WE CHASTIZE PEOPLE FOR FAILING BBCODE
WE WRITE BBCODE GAMES TOGETHER
send this BBCODE to every thread you care about including this one if you care. C how many times you get this, if you get even 1 (perfect reproduction) your A TRUE BBCODE EXPERT

Name: Anonymous 2008-02-02 11:09

>>7
IF U WERE HIDDEN BY A spoiler TAG TOMORROW, I WOULDNT GO 2 UR HOVERING CUZ ID B N DA REPLY BOX TO RITE A RAD BBCODE PROGRAM!
B B c o d e
B B c o d e
B B c o d e

WE TRUE BBCODE EXPERTS
WE CHASTIZE PEOPLE FOR FAILING BBCODE
WE WRITE BBCODE GAMES TOGETHER
send this BBCODE to every thread you care about including this one if you care. C how many times you get this, if you get even 1 (perfect reproduction) your A TRUE BBCODE EXPERT

Name: Anonymous 2008-02-02 11:11

>>7
IF U WERE HIDDEN BY A spoiler TAG TOMORROW, I WOULDNT GO 2 UR HOVERING CUZ ID B N DA REPLY BOX TO RITE A RAD BBCODE PROGRAM!
B B c o d e
B B c o d e
B B c o d e

WE TRUE BBCODE EXPERTS
WE CHASTIZE PEOPLE FOR FAILING BBCODE
WE WRITE BBCODE GAMES TOGETHER
send this BBCODE to every thread you care about including this one if you care. C how many times you get this, if you get even 1 (perfect reproduction) your A TRUE BBCODE EXPERT

Name: Anonymous 2008-02-02 11:13

>>7
IF U WERE HIDDEN BY A spoiler TAG TOMORROW, I WOULDNT GO 2 UR HOVERING CUZ ID B N DA REPLY BOX TO RITE A RAD BBCODE PROGRAM!
B B c o d e
B B c o d e
B B c o d e

WE TRUE BBCODE EXPERTS
WE CHASTIZE PEOPLE FOR FAILING BBCODE
WE WRITE BBCODE GAMES TOGETHER
send this BBCODE to every thread you care about including this one if you care. C how many times you get this, if you get even 1 (perfect reproduction) your A TRUE BBCODE EXPERT

Name: Anonymous 2008-02-02 11:13

>>7
IF U WERE HIDDEN BY A spoiler TAG TOMORROW, I WOULDNT GO 2 UR HOVERING CUZ ID B N DA REPLY BOX TO RITE A RAD BBCODE PROGRAM!
B B c o d e
B B c o d e
B B c o d e

WE TRUE BBCODE EXPERTS
WE CHASTIZE PEOPLE FOR FAILING BBCODE
WE WRITE BBCODE GAMES TOGETHER
send this BBCODE to every thread you care about including this one if you care. C how many times you get this, if you get even 1 (perfect reproduction) your A TRUE BBCODE EXPERT

Name: Anonymous 2008-02-02 11:14

>>7
IF U WERE HIDDEN BY A spoiler TAG TOMORROW, I WOULDNT GO 2 UR HOVERING CUZ ID B N DA REPLY BOX TO RITE A RAD BBCODE PROGRAM!
B B c o d e
B B c o d e
B B c o d e

WE TRUE BBCODE EXPERTS
WE CHASTIZE PEOPLE FOR FAILING BBCODE
WE WRITE BBCODE GAMES TOGETHER
send this BBCODE to every thread you care about including this one if you care. C how many times you get this, if you get even 1 (perfect reproduction) your A TRUE BBCODE EXPERT

Name: Anonymous 2008-02-02 11:14

>>7
IF U WERE HIDDEN BY A spoiler TAG TOMORROW, I WOULDNT GO 2 UR HOVERING CUZ ID B N DA REPLY BOX TO RITE A RAD BBCODE PROGRAM!
B B c o d e
B B c o d e
B B c o d e

WE TRUE BBCODE EXPERTS
WE CHASTIZE PEOPLE FOR FAILING BBCODE
WE WRITE BBCODE GAMES TOGETHER
send this BBCODE to every thread you care about including this one if you care. C how many times you get this, if you get even 1 (perfect reproduction) your A TRUE BBCODE EXPERT

Name: Anonymous 2008-02-02 11:15

>>7
IF U WERE HIDDEN BY A spoiler TAG TOMORROW, I WOULDNT GO 2 UR HOVERING CUZ ID B N DA REPLY BOX TO RITE A RAD BBCODE PROGRAM!
B B c o d e
B B c o d e
B B c o d e

WE TRUE BBCODE EXPERTS
WE CHASTIZE PEOPLE FOR FAILING BBCODE
WE WRITE BBCODE GAMES TOGETHER
send this BBCODE to every thread you care about including this one if you care. C how many times you get this, if you get even 1 (perfect reproduction) your A TRUE BBCODE EXPERT

Name: Anonymous 2011-02-04 12:12

Name: Anonymous 2011-02-04 12:20

Name: Sgt.Kabu鉥䝇kiman䤸侐 2012-05-28 22:57

Bringing /prog/ back to its people
All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy
All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy
All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy
All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy
All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy
All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy
All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy
All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy
All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy
All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy
All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy
All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy
All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy
All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy
All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy
All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy
All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy

Don't change these.
Name: Email:
Entire Thread Thread List