>>8
It would help if people thought "heh, that's funny" or "oo, nice comeback" when they saw the meme in use. Currently it's more of a "fucking spamfags" feeling, which doesn't quite cut it.
Name:
Anonymous2007-03-01 5:22 ID:N3w1YtQl
>>9
You can't prove to others more than one guy is following a meme, and you can't prove to yourself more than one guy besides you is following a meme. I posted the too bad Ruby on Rails, and I saw posts that were not mine, so all I know is there's at least one more person doing it, but they could be more.
Name:
Anonymous2007-03-01 7:09 ID:RQjZ6+Jq
>>10
Whoooaat?
In what way is your comment related to >>9? This is mind-blowing.
Name:
Anonymous2007-03-01 9:02 ID:N3w1YtQl
>>11
I wanted to reply to >>9, then came up with a different idea, and forgot about it.
Name:
Anonymous2007-03-01 9:06 ID:WV2OZYsd
>>12
One word, forced indentation of code. Thread over.
Bringing /prog/ back to its people
All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy
All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy
All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy
All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy
All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy
All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy
All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy
All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy
All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy
All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy
All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy