One word, the forced indentation of code. Thread over. Thread over. Thread over. Thread over. Thread over. Thread over. Thread over. Thread over. Thread over. Thread over. Thread over. I SAID THREAD OVER AND I TYPED ALL THOSE THREAD OVERS BY HAND SO THREAD OVEEEEEEER
Name:
Anonymous2007-02-11 1:22
Virtualized virtualization
Name:
Anonymous2007-02-11 5:07
>>1
"- GNU Hurd"
ha ha ha ha, you're talking about year 2107 not 2007, arent't you ?
Name:
Anonymous2007-02-12 3:50
Enumerate more open sauce that everybody talks about but never gets released
Name:
Anonymous2007-02-12 4:09
- ruby 2
- kde 4
Name:
Anonymous2007-02-12 4:12
- xhtml 2.0
- css 3
- javascript 2.0
Name:
Anonymous2007-02-12 5:31
LISP
Name:
Anonymous2007-02-12 5:36
>>10
AFAIK KDE4 is scheduled for this year (for real).
>>11
XHTML2: Blame the W3C, it caught the gay with XHTML1 and being professional enterprise scalable business solutions orientated already. So-called HTML5 is IMO the way to go.
CSS3: Blame MSIE.
>>16
not everyone is going to use a wysiwyg editor to read your code!
Name:
Anonymous2007-02-12 11:07
>>17
for web based wysiwyg editors, you nincompoop
Name:
Anonymous2007-02-12 11:10
- Forced indentation
(thread over)
Name:
Anonymous2007-02-12 11:11
>>15
HTML5 is about getting things done. It's about what Google does, and what you do if you are doing serious business (note that serious business != enterprise business). If a FONT tag gets things done, and it's widely supported (which it is), then it can be part of HTML5. Semantic fags went the way of XHTML, and are now working in a professional enterprise Web 2.0 scalable AJAX SOAP XML-based XML-over-XML-over-XML-over-XML-over-XML solution with XML and XML.
Name:
Anonymous2007-02-12 11:22
>>20
I agree that xhtml is one word, forced indentation. threed over.
business model at the fuck is an assertion that returns a random number generator to shuffle the cards and instruction sheets The carrier is also factored in wisdom as well if there was a success Yeah a huge suc Wait.