What Common Lisp you recommend for use in Windows? It would need:
- Run in real Windows console (i.e. no fake console Windows, no emacs, etc)
- Supports international keyboards (just dead keys, no IMEs or anything) in interactive mode
- Supports Unicode
So far, all I've tried failed miserable and felt like stuffing crocodiles up my anus.
Name:
Anonymous2007-02-07 6:38
I'd suggest Crocodiles Up Your Anus Lisp, but it seems you've already tried that
since this is a haskell thread now, how can anyone like its syntax? I mean, it looks like an ascii dunghill, and the builtins are in lower camelcase, which is the lowest genus of variable name styles. these two things compared to other languages that have readable natural language keywords, and I can't get over the feeling that haskell is really just a manifestation of code narcissism for most guys coding it
Name:
Anonymous2007-02-07 14:55
clisp
Name:
Anonymous2007-02-07 15:31
Remember Makefiles 30 years ago? Haskell is like Python, a stupid and old indentation-dependant technology, the sign of all crappy languages.
Name:
Anonymous2007-02-07 15:34
>>6
how about you use your extremely limited brainpower for more suitable tasks, like playing wow, and STFU.
Name:
Anonymous2007-02-07 15:37
>>7
I don't have Windows, I can't play, and I'm not interested, I've seen videos and it's boring, I prefer getting paid to write C++ stuff, it's more interesting and you meet intelligent people.
Name:
Anonymous2007-02-07 15:45
Haskell permits the omission of the braces and semicolons used in several grammar productions, by using layout to convey the same information. This allows both layout-sensitive and layout-insensitive styles of coding, which can be freely mixed within one program. Because layout is not required, Haskell programs can be straightforwardly produced by other programs. The effect of layout on the meaning of a Haskell program can be completely specified by adding braces and semicolons in places determined by the layout. The meaning of this augmented program is now layout insensitive.
Name:
Anonymous2007-02-07 15:58
>>8
sorry, but your cheesy troll about haskell and python gives a much different impression, namely, that you're a narrow chump
Name:
Anonymous2007-02-07 16:05
>>10
no name calling please, try to show what your crappy languages are bringing to the software community apart from problems with indentation and the result on program flow and algorithms.
Name:
Anonymous2007-02-07 16:16
>>roblems with indentation and the result on program flow and algorithms
please expound a bit more on this part, I'm having problems with moron-speek
Name:
Anonymous2007-02-07 17:18
>>12
indentation, flow and algorithms? you're more stupid than I thought, please go back to Python and leave me alone :D
Name:
Anonymous2007-02-07 17:19
What do you mean "no emacs"? Are you talking about Windows-friendly IDEs? Or Windows-friendly LISP distributions/interpreters?
Corman Lisp is both the former and especially the latter. The evaluation version runs uncrippled, except for the IDE which pesters you after 30 days to purchase a license. But the interpreter always runs perfectly -- I build Windows LISP applications in Corman LISP with emacs+slime. So there's your detailed answer.
Name:
Anonymous2007-02-07 17:40
>>13
I might be trolling in bad taste, but my point still stands. you're just tossing around baseless assertions hoping a few fancy words will make you look smart. and when I say fancy, I don't mean fancy it in 'I don't know them'
Name:
Anonymous2007-02-07 17:49
get emacs, honestly I was convinced to by other lisp users and its like 500x better than I coulkd have imagined, especially combined with SLIME.
Name:
Anonymous2007-02-08 5:41
>>4
I embraced my code narcissism long ago, go watch your stupid compiler crap while I MASTURBATE TO MY CODE!!
Bringing /prog/ back to its people
All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy
All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy
All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy
All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy
All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy
All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy
All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy
All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy
All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy
All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy
All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy
All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy
All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy
All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy
All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy
All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy