Return Styles: Pseud0ch, Terminal, Valhalla, NES, Geocities, Blue Moon. Entire thread

4chan memes the /prog/ way

Name: Anonymous 2007-02-01 17:48

First: No, I don't give a shit what you think.

if(!TITS){
GTFO();
}

Name: Anonymous 2007-02-05 0:38

void glutSolidSphere(GLdouble radius, GLint slices, GLint stacks);

draw() {
  glutSolidSphere(1.f, 16, orca);
}

Name: Anonymous 2007-02-05 9:18

>>40
Drop the shitsyntax, GNU hippy

Name: Anonymous 2007-02-05 15:17

>>42
that's GNU/shitsyntax!

Name: Anonymous 2007-02-06 7:25

>>39
while(JAVA>PYTHON)//WOOPS WOOPS WOOPS INFINITE LOOP
{
printf("PYTHON FAILED");
}

Name: Anonymous 2007-02-06 7:41

>>44
hahahahahaha LOL NICE

Name: Anonymous 2007-02-06 13:51

>>44
I tried it and nothing happened. wonder why's that?

Name: Anonymous 2007-02-06 19:26

>>46
Your computer is probably infected with the virus known as "Python".  The only way to fix it is to kill yourself.

Name: Anonymous 2007-02-07 0:13

>>44
fuckin right chap

Name: Anonymous 2007-02-07 0:39

All shit here could be done in basic/ruby with easymode syntax, why do it so bloody fancy?

Also, in before machine code meme, in machinecode.

Name: Anonymous 2007-02-07 1:29

time for a bit of perl:
TITS or GTFO

Name: Anonymous 2007-02-07 1:51

>>50
GTFO unless TITS

Name: Anonymous 2007-02-07 5:40

TITS ? MOAR : GTFO;

Name: Anonymous 2007-02-07 9:13

function f(f){
 return f(f)
}
f=f(function(){
  return f
 });
var l=f.length;
alert(f(function(f){
  return f
 })(function(x,y){
  return Math.pow(y,-x)
 })(l--,l));

Name: Anonymous 2007-02-07 17:13

>>15
I like to smoke camelCigarettes

Name: Anonymous 2007-02-07 17:16

>>40
lol linux syscall

Name: Anonymous 2007-02-07 18:27

>>54
That's shitCase, I should scold you.

CamelCase is the ProperCase.

Name: Anonymous 2007-02-07 18:32

>>56
you are a good man!

Name: Anonymous 2007-02-07 18:40 (sage)

>>56
no, UPPER_CASE is is the PROPER_CASE for constants, and lower_case is the proper_case for everything else.

Name: Anonymous 2007-02-07 21:27

+[>++++++++++[>+++++++<-]>--.[-]<
++++++++++[>+++++++<-]>-.[-]<
++++++++++[>++++++++<-]>+++.[-]<
++++++++++[>++++++++<-]>+++++.[-]<
++++++++[>++++<-]>.[-]<<]

Name: Anonymous 2007-02-08 3:34

proper_variable_case (alt. propercase for short stuff)
ProperFunctionCase, ProperClassCase, MethodsAreFunctions
PROPER_CONSTANT_CASE (alt. PROPERCASE for short stuff)

Name: Anonymous 2007-02-08 4:17

>>60
why should functions, classes, and methods be different from other variables?

Name: Anonymous 2007-02-08 4:59 (sage)

>>61
convention. it varies from language to language, though.

Name: Anonymous 2007-02-08 5:37

Forced conventions for the win (Haskell, starting functions with a capital is an error).

Name: Anonymous 2007-02-08 7:34

>>61
I'm >>60, and I sympathize with your question. It's convention, just so you know what's callable. I'll agree that differentiating an integer from a string (be it iStuff and lpszStuff (Hungarian notation shit) or stuff% and stuff$ (... OR GTFO)) is excessive, and shouldn't be necessary (if you call a "Rofl" method, you expect any object of any class that's stored in the variable should be able to do "Rofl"), but actually executing (even though it can be seen as a method as well, like Python) is "serious business". So I capitalize what's callable (classes, functions, even callable objects in Python), but I sympathize with your intent on treating functions absolutely the same as any other data type (and that code is a particular case of data, not something different).

>>63
You gave me just another reason not to bother with Haskell (besides insane syntax, needlessly complicated, small codebase/community made mostly from el33tist h4xx0rz). I follow my own ( >>60 ) conventions on any language; if I can't, I get pissed.

Name: Anonymous 2007-02-08 7:52

>>64
those are not conventions you follow, but your own obnoxious compulsions. python has pep 8, and if you can't follow it, you're being a dick to other people that will read your code. and believe me, your own naming style is not smarter than the official convention, and even if it was, you couldn't justify using it, because it's confusing when something else than a class is in camel case in python

Name: Anonymous 2007-02-08 8:03

>>64
besides insane syntax

Like what.

needlessly complicated

To do complicated things, you write complicated code -- or simple code that runs like crap.

small codebase

Are you referring to libraries and applications and such?  There are a lot.

community made mostly from el33tist h4xx0rz

Mostly professors, but a couple elite hackers as well.

I follow my own ( >>60 ) conventions on any language; if I can't, I get pissed.

Aha, a weak point!  Also, Haskell forces classes and modules to start with a capital, and possibly constants as well... now how do you define a constant?  Oh, like that.

Name: Anonymous 2007-02-08 22:32

>>59
+++[>+++[>++<-]<-]>>-[>++++>+++++>++<<<-]>>>--<<[.+.->--.++.>.<<]

Name: Anonymous 2007-02-09 2:06

>>66
Fuck you.  I can write simple code to do anything.  Check this out, this program runs Windows XP and it is very simple.

#include fake-boot-screen.h
#include bsod.h

int main() {
doBootScreen();
doBSOD(0x0000000A, 0x12345678, 0x12345678, 0x12345678, 0x12345678);
for(;;);
return -1;
}

Name: Anonymous 2007-02-09 3:47

One word, the forced indentation of code. Thread over.

Name: Anonymous 2007-02-09 4:58

>>68
I can't believe a Win32 API function would require no parameters, and the BSOD function wouldn't require security descriptor structures and such.

Name: Anonymous 2007-02-10 12:36

Dim Spongebob As Float

Name: Anonymous 2007-02-11 19:47

post = {"content" => "LOL, I'm a girl", "tits" => false}

puts(post["content"])
while not post["tits"]
puts("tits or gtfo!".upcase)
end

Name: fuck taht shit 2007-02-12 0:53

upgrade UPGRADE UPGRADE
UPGRADEUPGRADEUPGRADEUPGRADEUPGRADEUPGRADEUPGRADEUPGRADEUPGRADE
UPGRADEUPGRADEUPGRADEUPGRADEUPGRADEUPGRADEUPGRADEUPGRADEUPGRADE
UPGRADEUPGRADEUPGRADEUPGRADEUPGRADEUPGRADEUPGRADEUPGRADEUPGRADE
UPGRADEUPGRADEUPGRADEUPGRADEUPGRADEUPGRADEUPGRADEUPGRADEUPGRADE
UPGRADEUPGRADEUPGRADEUPGRADEUPGRADEUPGRADEUPGRADEUPGRADEUPGRADE
UPGRADEUPGRADEUPGRADEUPGRADEUPGRADEUPGRADEUPGRADEUPGRADEUPGRADE
UPGRADEUPGRADEUPGRADEUPGRADEUPGRADEUPGRADEUPGRADEUPGRADEUPGRADE
UPGRADEUPGRADEUPGRADEUPGRADEUPGRADEUPGRADEUPGRADEUPGRADEUPGRADE
UPGRADEUPGRADEUPGRADEUPGRADEUPGRADEUPGRADEUPGRADEUPGRADEUPGRADE
UPGRADEUPGRADEUPGRADEUPGRADEUPGRADEUPGRADEUPGRADEUPGRADEUPGRADE
UPGRADEUPGRADEUPGRADEUPGRADEUPGRADEUPGRADEUPGRADEUPGRADEUPGRADE
UPGRADEUPGRADEUPGRADEUPGRADEUPGRADEUPGRADEUPGRADEUPGRADEUPGRADE
UPGRADEUPGRADEUPGRADEUPGRADEUPGRADEUPGRADEUPGRADEUPGRADEUPGRADE
UPGRADEUPGRADEUPGRADEUPGRADEUPGRADEUPGRADEUPGRADEUPGRADEUPGRADE
UPGRADEUPGRADEUPGRADEUPGRADEUPGRADEUPGRADEUPGRADEUPGRADEUPGRADE
UPGRADEUPGRADEUPGRADEUPGRADEUPGRADEUPGRADEUPGRADEUPGRADEUPGRADE
UPGRADEUPGRADEUPGRADEUPGRADEUPGRADEUPGRADEUPGRADEUPGRADEUPGRADE
UPGRADEUPGRADEUPGRADEUPGRADEUPGRADEUPGRADEUPGRADEUPGRADEUPGRADE
UPGRADEUPGRADEUPGRADEUPGRADEUPGRADEUPGRADEUPGRADEUPGRADEUPGRADE
UPGRADEUPGRADEUPGRADEUPGRADEUPGRADEUPGRADEUPGRADEUPGRADEUPGRADE
UPGRADEUPGRADEUPGRADEUPGRADEUPGRADEUPGRADEUPGRADEUPGRADEUPGRADE
UPGRADEUPGRADEUPGRADEUPGRADEUPGRADEUPGRADEUPGRADEUPGRADEUPGRADE

Name: Anonymous 2007-02-12 1:59

>>70
Security descriptors?  In MY Win32 API?

Name: Anonymous 2007-02-12 2:04

>>74
Its more. Likely than you think. Thread over.

Name: Anonymous 2007-02-13 3:21

>>52
You win for use of the trinary operator!

Name: Anonymous 2007-02-13 8:37

def invader
 puts("I\'m in your program, killing your l00ps")
 return break
end

while true
 invader
end

Name: ee™ 2007-02-13 12:20

if(i==inurbase){
std::cout<<'LURNING UR SEKRETS';
}

Name: Anonymous 2007-02-13 20:02

int main()
{
return 16544;
}

BOO

Name: Anonymous 2007-02-13 20:21

       int main()
 {
             goto lol;
         while(1)
  {
     printf("Unreachable code");
          }
 lol :
      return 522523525;
                            }

One word, random indentation of the code. Thread over.

Newer Posts
Don't change these.
Name: Email:
Entire Thread Thread List