I have 20 years programming experience writing HUGE Programs that you couldnt even comprehend. I wrote an ANSI C compiler when I was 12 years old.
You should just accept everything I say, I dont HAVE to give any reasons for my arguments because I am an EXPERT PROGRAMMER.
Name:
Anonymous2007-01-28 8:32
`(OvO)'
O'RLY??
Name:
Anonymous2007-01-28 9:31
If I gave you some source code, could you write a program that would decide if it had an infinite loop definitively?
Name:
Anonymous2007-01-28 12:15
YES
the program would look like
PRINT "true";
or
PRINT "false";
depending on the source code you give me.
Name:
Anonymous2007-01-28 12:58
I have 30 years programming experience writing HUGE Programs that you couldnt even comprehend. I wrote an x86 assembler in assembler when I was 12 years old.
You should just accept everything I say, I dont HAVE to give any reasons for my arguments because I am an EXPERT PROGRAMMER.
I have 300 years programming experience writing HUGE Programs that you couldnt even comprehend. I wrote an x86 assembler in assembler when I was 6 years old.
You should just accept everything I say, I dont HAVE to give any reasons for my arguments because I am an EXPERT PROGRAMMER.
I have over 9000 years programming experience writing HUGE Programs that you couldnt even comprehend. I wrote 90% of the software released since I was 2 years old.
You should just accept everything I say, I dont HAVE to give any reasons for my arguments because I am an EXPERT PROGRAMMER.
Name:
Anonymous2007-01-28 16:49
I hacked for God when he made the Earth.
I know your every reaction and move.
Furries and scat lovers are my "Easter Eggs"
Name:
Anonymous2007-01-29 1:19
I have over 32,767 years programming experience writing HUGE Programs that you couldnt even comprehend. I wrote Windows Vista using nothing but vi, make, and gcc.
You should just accept everything I say, I dont HAVE to give any reasons for my arguments because I am an EXPERT PROGRAMMER.
Name:
Anonymous2007-01-29 2:22
I have over 65,535 years programming experience writing XBOX-SIZED programs that you couldn't even begin to comprehend with 100% of your brains. I wrote the first ANSI C compiler when I was -12 years old, using ANSI C.
You should just accept everything I say, I don't HAVE to give any reasons for my arguments because I am an ALMIGHTY PROGRAMMER.
Name:
Anonymous2007-01-29 2:37
LOL your methods have undefined behaviour you fail.
I am the bone of my editor.
ascii is my body, and binary is my blood.
I have created over a thousand shell scripts.
Unknown to sigkill.
Nor known to sigquit.
Have withstood pain to create many functions.
Yet, those hands will never hold anything.
So as I type, "Unlimited Hacker Works."
>>20
UTF-16 makes you weeaboo. Quit being a fucking weeaboo, shithead.
Name:
Anonymous2007-01-29 14:43
Half of my functions are anonymous.
win
Name:
Anonymous2007-01-29 15:29
>>21
UTF-16 is the sane solution for string manipulation. Save for surrogates, which are seldom used and you can very well afford the effects if you want to use them, you have O(1) length (with a decent strings library) and O(1) indexing.
Name:
Anonymous2007-01-29 15:47
I have over 9000 lifetimes of fapping experience writing HUGE Penis that you couldnt even comprehend. I wrote 90% of the penis released since I was 2 years old.
You should just accept everything I say, I dont HAVE to give any reasons for my arguments because I am an EXPERT FAPPER.
Name:
Anonymous2007-01-29 15:54
I am an expert coprogrammer. You may have seen my work in public toilets the world over!
Name:
Anonymous2007-01-29 15:55
>>23
You're talking about UCS-2 there, dude. UTF-16 can still have extension words.
Name:
Anonymous2007-01-29 17:05
FUCKING ENCODING FAGS GTFO IM AN EXPERT PROGRAMMER
Name:
Anonymous2007-01-29 20:13
>>26
No, he mentioned the 'extension words'; they're called surrogate pairs. Of course, you can't really have both surrogate support and O(1) indexing (unless you keep a pointer to every single character). You can optimize your implementation though. You could keep a flag that indicates whether the string doesn't have surrogate pairs (indexing is O(1)), has only surrogate pairs (also O(1)), or is mixed (indexing becomes more difficult). If you have long mixed strings and really need fast indexing for some reason, that's still fairly easy to optimize (eg. keep a table with pointers to every Nth char.. I suppose this would also be O(1)).
As for O(1) length, that's completely trivial, you just keep a separate byte count and char count in your string object.
Name:
Anonymous2007-01-29 20:37
>>28
Ok, sure, that'll still be O(1), if orders of magnitude slower than a simple "lea eax,[ebx+ecx*1]" or some such. Then again, long as you're cache-bound I suppose it doesn't make a difference, and for processing text one character at a time there's not much competition.
I'd likely do it with UCS-4 though. It's only twice as hueg as UCS-2 and applications generally don't have enough strings for it to make much of a difference.
Name:
Anonymous2007-01-30 3:35
BIG O NOTATION MEASURES ORDERS OF MAGNITUDE MORON
Name:
Anonymous2007-01-30 18:20
>>26
I already said that in >>23, so you failed at reading or knowledge of Unicode. >>23 Save for surrogates
Is anyone on this board NOT an expert programmer??
Name:
Anonymous2007-01-31 8:47
ALL THE LADIES LOVE ME, BECAUSE IM EDIBACA/
Name:
Anonymous2007-01-31 14:24
I have over 1 month programming experience, and I wrote Windows XP when I was 42.
You should just accept everything I say, I don't HAVE to give any reasons for my arguments because I am an ALMIGHTY PROGRAMMER, and 97% of the planet uses my OS.
IF YOU WROTE PRGRMS IN FORTRN YOUD KNOW YOU CANT USE ANY WORDS LONGER THAN SIX LTTERS
AT LEAST YOU KNOW ENOUGH FORTRN TO WRITE ALL YOUR WORDS IN CPITAL LTTERS
Name:
Anonymous2007-02-04 18:00
I have over 100 000 years programming experience, and I wrote MS-DOS, Windows 1.0, Windows 2.0, Windows 3.0, Windows NT, Windows 95, Windows 98, Windows ME, Windows XP, Windows Vista, Windows Vienna, Unix, GNU/linux, mac OS during the same day when I was 3.
You should just accept everything I say, I don't HAVE to give any reasons for my arguments because I am an EXPERT PROGRAMMER.
I have over 1<<128 years programming experience, and I toggled in my first OS using self-modifying algorithms in x86_64 hex bytecode using a hairpin on the motherboard 3 seconds after I exited my mothers vagina. It was so blazingly fast that it could divide by zero and give an accurate answer, and included a 5 dimensional GUI that only I could use without having my brain fried because of the vast complexity.
You should just accept everything I say, I don't HAVE to give any reasons for my arguments because I am an EXPERT PROGRAMMER.
Name:
Anonymous2007-02-05 0:54
I have over 1<<129 years programming experience, and I toggled in my first OS using self-modifying algorithms in x86_64 hex bytecode using a hairpin on the motherboard 2.99999999E+9999999999999999999999 seconds after I exited my mothers vagina. It was so blazingly fast that it could divide by zero and give an accurate answer, and included a 5.1 dimensional GUI that only I could use without having my brain fried because of the vast complexity.
You should just accept everything I say, I don't HAVE to give any reasons for my arguments because I am an EXPERT PROGRAMMER.
Name: Email:
Name:
Anonymous2007-02-05 1:47
Is it possible to have fractional dimensions?
Name:
Anonymous2007-02-05 1:59
>>55
Current GUIs are sometimes said to have 2.1 dimensions because you can layer windows above and below each other, but it's not a full 3 dimensions of freedom.
Yes, I am a Master Programmer. So? I dont see any problem. I embraced my bianary soul long ago and I am happy together with my boyfriend (who is a cute VB/NET Programmer!). We have a fucking lot of friends in and outside of the internet and I am pretty slim and good looking.
But thanks anyway asshole. Go and watch your stupid JAVA shit while I program SEX with my boyfriend.
Name:
Anonymous2007-02-05 8:55
>>60
O______________________o
im a vm/net programmer and my bf considers himself a master.. wonder if thats you
HI I AM LINUX TARBALLS FOUNDER AND CEO OF LINUX ENTERPRISES. I HAVE 20 YEARS EXPERIENCE WRITING HUGE OSES AND I WROTE THEM ALL UPON EXITING THE MANHOLE OF MY MOTHER WITH GODSPEED. MY NOT YET DEVELOPED MANHOOD DEVELOPED IN AN INSTANT TO THE GIRTH AND LENGTH SO FAMILIAR TO THE WOMEN OF THE EARTH TODAY. UTILIZING IT I COMPILED A KERNEL AND MAULED MY MOTHER SENSELESS WITH POST HASTE. SHE GENTLY ASKED ME NOT TO GO BACK FROM WHERE I CAME AND I OBLIGED BY ONLY SHOVING MY MASSIVE MANHOOD UP HER UTERUS. STILL INEXPERIENCED, MY SYSTEM LOAD REACHED CRITICAL MASS AND A DATA PORT WAS OPENED WHICH THROUGH CAME A STREAM OF STICKY WHITE BYTES, COMPLETELY FILLING UP HER FLOPPY DRIVE. THIS WAS THE TIME BEFORE THERE WERE HUGE FUCKING HARDDRIVES SO I LET THE NEVERENDING ENTER HER MOLEHILL, KILLING GENERATIONS OF MOLES IN THE PROGRESS. HAVING EMPTIED MY VESSEL, I LET OUT A FIENDISH CRY AND STARTED SUCKING AND BITING HER NIPPLES, OUT CAME THE DRINK OF GODS. MY MOTHER BEING OF THE SAME FLESH AND BLOOD AS ME, DID NOT DISAPPOINT -- THE DIVINE FLOOD FILLED THE ENTIRE PLANET WITH ITS SWEET LIQUOR, I UNABLE TO DRINK IT ALL, SPENT FIVE MINUTES WRITING WINDOWS VISTA AND ITS PREQUELS WHILE WAITING FOR IT TO DRY AWAY. I DON'T HAVE TO GIVE ANY REASONS FOR MY ARGUMENTS, I GUARANTEE IT.
Actually, UTF-18 would be the ideal representation format if we had processors with 18, 36 or 72-bit registers. I wish that happened. Oh and death to the byte, just an invention of an amerifag who had his head too far up his arse to notice there are other languages in the world.
Name:
Anonymous2007-02-06 17:35
seriously, who gives a fuck
you can express UTF-8 as a series of BYTES, EXPLAIN THAT MR ASSHOLE
Name:
Anonymous2007-02-06 18:07
Byte = amerifag shit
ASCII = amerifag shit
Unicode should have been a standard from the start, and we should have grouped bits in sets of 18, giving 18 bit bytes and 18 bit block addressing. Sure, we'd require three lines to select 18 bit columns in memory and such, wasting values 18-23, but who the fuck cares if it would have saved ALL the encoding insanity and the 83459279082893478789045253470982345078953478903429875673452 character sets there are.
Name:
Anonymous2007-02-06 19:16
>>69
lol, looks like someone just learned what registers are and came to complain, despite not knowing any about how processors are designed
Name:
Anonymous2007-02-07 1:50
>>71
Sorry, but in the 8-bit days (where it all started) there wasn't enough ROOM for 16/24/32 wide character data types, when 4k of RAM cost $499 and such.
It's the fucking Chinese's fault for having 56,000 goddamn characters in their fucking language. If it wasn't for their communist asses Unicode could go suck it.
>>75
Less so in fact. The French are socialist pigs with something like 25% unemployment thanks to government gouging the economy. At least China has an economy.
Name:
Anonymous2007-02-07 5:54
>>72
Looks like you have your 8 bit head too far up your ass... BTW, there have been machines with word sizes that weren't powers of 2, such as 36.
>>73
Memory wouldn't be too much expensive because you wouldn't be increasing its capacity, but modifying its column size, and it'd be pretty much the same later on. Buses would be more expensive at first, but who cares, look at what you're getting.
As for Unicode being the Chinese fault: fail. Fail hard. Epic proportions hard. In other words, American.
First, it's not only the Chinese but the Japanese, Korean, Thai, and a dozen more languages. Second, even if they didn't exist, 8 bytes would be the shit. Europe alone requires more than 256 characters, and different character sets are a fugly as shit hack invented by Americans so that they would be able to trade with all European countries (because the first 128 amerifags use are the same) but European countries wouldn't be able to talk to each other.
Name:
Anonymous2007-02-07 6:34
>>77
it's not so clear cut, as there's, say, plan 9 from bell labs that was made by amerifags too, but had better utf-8 support back in the day than any modern OS *now*. afaik japanese also prefer sjis over unicode
Name:
Anonymous2007-02-07 7:23
>>78
Plan9 was not made by rednecks, but by resepctable Americans.
Japs who prefer SJIS have a penis complex.
Name:
Anonymous2007-02-07 7:35
>>79
everyone knows that all americans are pigs, and, those that aren't, have taken refuge in tiny, isolated pockets, and wouldn't be making an os. you're obviously a retarded pig too, as clearly indicated by your crippled spelling, humor and reasoning
Name:
Anonymous2007-02-07 17:51
fuck this, this threads gone to shit needs more expert programmers
Needs more neckbeard.
If one does not have a neckbeard, they will be provided one at the door.
Name:
Anonymous2007-02-08 21:07
Only expert unix programmers have neckbeards. Expert windows programmers have glasses and a bad complexion.
Name:
Anonymous2007-02-09 3:02
GET YO NECKBEERD
Name:
Anonymous2007-02-09 4:29
One word, the forced indentation of code. Thread over because I am an EXPERT PROGRAMMER.
Name:
Anonymous2007-02-09 10:48
I have 200k years programming experience writing HUGE Programs that you couldnt even comprehend using ASCII. I wrote HL2 using an x86 assembler yesterday.
You should just accept everything I say, I dont HAVE to give any reasons for my arguments because I am an EXPERT PROGRAMMER.
Name:
Anonymous2007-02-09 20:21
I wrote the universe.
You should just accept everything I say, I dont HAVE to give any reasons for my arguments because I am GOD.
Name:
Anonymous2007-02-09 21:42
i dont know shit about computers i just post on 4chan and stroke my cock
I have 20 years programming experience writing HUGE Programs WITHOUT FORCED INDENTATION OF CODE that you couldnt even comprehend. I designed and implemented a HYPER-SPACE ROBOT when I was 10 years old!
You should just accept forced indentation of code because I say, I dont HAVE to give any reasons for my arguments because I am an EXPERT PROGRAMMER.
Name:
Anonymous2007-02-11 10:55
>>95
the problem is that most kids on this board don't have any kind of experience even if they talk all the time about their thousand's version of the Fibonacci version written in Haskell.
>>98
the canonical way to write that is with zeros, therefore, you fail the infallibility test, and correspondingly the supreme expertise test. a fail is you, ramen.
Name:
IBeatYouAllAtProg2007-02-11 18:20
100GET in a pointless thread
Name:
Anonymous2007-02-12 5:51
I have over two hours programming experience writing some program that I couldnt even comprehend. I wrote some shit that is kinda hard to explain what it does.
You should just accept everything I say, I dont HAVE to give any reasons for my arguments because I am going to be an EXPERT PROGRAMMER. One day.