Return Styles: Pseud0ch, Terminal, Valhalla, NES, Geocities, Blue Moon. Entire thread

PYTHON FAILED SORRY SIRS

Name: Anonymous 2006-12-26 21:24

PYTHON GOT OWNED BY JAVA JAVA DOES EVERYTHING BETTER THAN PYTHON PYTHON IS CRAP PYTHON SUCKS PYTHON IS USELESS PYTHON IS SLOW PYTHON SUCKS PYTHON IS GETTING OWNED BY JAVA PYTHON IS SLOW LIEK HELL PROGRAMMING IN PYTHON IS LIKE DANCING WITH SATAN SAY NO TO DRUGS... AND PYTHON PYTHON FANBOYS ARE STUPID PYTHON FANBOYS SHOULD USE JAVA PYTHON SUCKS PYTHON SUCKS PYTHON SUCKS

Name: Anonymous 2006-12-26 22:39 (sage)

>>1
Fail

Name: Anonymous 2006-12-27 7:06

Python failed because it hasn't shaken off its toy language infrastructure that it has had since ten years ago. I mean seriously, interpreted bytecodes? No JIT compiling, no partial type inference? People, Lisp environments have had these things for literally decades now and Lisp is fucking Lisp instead of a kinda-sorta toy language like Python!

It's still hanging on to the proven-sucky half-assery known as reference counting! The runtime doesn't fucking multithread because of the "one big mutex" way they ended up half-arsing it, so any multithreaded extensions you have are just doing several I/O operations in parallel if you're lucky. Even then they are using operating system threads and so won't get the benefit of extra speedy thread switching you otherwise would with ULTs like in GNU Pth!

I don't mean that stuff like that didn't exist. Psyco, as I understand, is pretty good for things where it fucking lets itself work properly. What my mind boggles at is why the _fuck_ is the compiler from Psyco not part of the standard Python runtime, when it could just as well be?

What pisses me off most about Python though is that so many people are using Guido's cheap toy for serious work and getting bit on the ass for their trouble. Oh, and the besmirching of Monty Python's name, that too.

Seriously, suck and fail, people, suck and fail. About the only good thing to come out of Python was the kinda-sorta indent-based syntax and binding to name-mangled C++ class implementations dynamically.

Name: Anonymous 2006-12-27 7:12

FAKE

Name: Anonymous 2006-12-27 17:41

But...but...I like python! (IHBT)

Name: Anonymous 2006-12-27 19:12

>>3
Troll, most points invalid, some valid points (like all good trolls), but the last paragraph gives it all. I love forced indenting (makes idiot write decently), but many people criticize it, and I think nobody likes name mangling, another highly criticized point.

Name: Anonymous 2006-12-27 21:06

Java does everything python does except safter and faster. The only thing python has over Java is eval.

Name: Anonymous 2006-12-28 5:25

>>6
Care to debate those points you seem to think invalid? Seriously, dude, "invalid"? What are you, the Debate Authority?

At least have the balls to argue.

Name: Anonymous 2006-12-28 6:37

EEEN VARRR LEEEED

Name: Anonymous 2006-12-28 8:51 (sage)

>>6
Troll, most points invalid, some valid points (like all good trolls), but the last paragraph gives it all.

>>8
YHBT.

Name: Anonymous 2006-12-28 17:58

>>7
Java is safttttter!!! Actually no, if GC comes and crap on your processes...

Name: Anonymous 2006-12-28 21:41

lol, Java
lol, Python

Name: Anonymous 2006-12-28 21:54

>>7
EXACTLY

Name: Anonymous 2006-12-30 5:22 (sage)

In after trollbait and the poor bastards who fell for it.

Name: Anonymous 2006-12-30 14:05

python always failed

Name: Anonymous 2006-12-30 18:38 (sage)

also sage

Name: Anonymous 2007-01-01 6:25 (sage)

Wow. Just awful.

Name: flibberdyjibbett !sJh8mwqDUo 2007-01-02 12:57

Pyhton was designed to be easy for beginners.
I personally prefer Pascal for that purpose, but I
find Python adequate. I have needed a compiler, so
thanks for the Pyco refernce. Do you also know of a
compiler for bash or zsh scripts?

Name: Anonymous 2007-01-02 14:51

>>18
remove the $ signs and then compile it as python code

Name: the lord of OMGWTF 2007-01-02 14:52

shut up, and switch to C++

Name: Anonymous 2007-01-03 0:41

shut up and learn C

Name: Anonymous 2007-01-03 19:51

>>20
>>21
failed you choose a language depending on what you want to do

Name: Anonymous 2007-01-03 20:47

boo

Name: Anonymous 2007-01-04 1:22

>>22
no, you just use Lisp, it's the perfect language.

Name: Anonymous 2007-01-04 1:28

>>24
Give me a single decent universally-supported Lisp first.

Common Lisp is a travesty. Maybe Scheme will kick its mouldy old ass eventually.

Name: Anonymous 2007-01-04 21:48

FUCK PYTHON
FUCK JAVA
FUCK YOU

FUCK YOU

Name: Anonymous 2007-01-08 1:00

>>2
no u

>>24
LISP failed.

>>26
You failed.

Name: Anonymous 2007-01-08 2:17

ASM OWNZZ

Name: Anonymous 2007-01-08 7:51

bump

Name: Anonymous 2007-01-08 15:03

>>28
fkn true

Name: Anonymous 2007-01-09 14:46

>>27
Lisp would have failed if I wasn't using it for big AI projects. Now GTFO noob.

Name: Anonymous 2007-01-09 16:52

>>31
more like artificial stupidity

Name: Anonymous 2007-01-10 1:21

>>32
more liek stfu troll

Name: Anonymous 2007-01-10 2:05

>>32 is win

Name: Anonymous 2007-01-10 6:56 (sage)

This thread is now about how easy it is to troll programmers.

Name: Anonymous 2007-01-10 8:25

>>31
lisp is made of fail

Name: Anonymous 2007-01-10 9:41

fail is made of win

Name: Anonymous 2007-01-10 18:34

lisp is made of parenthesis too

Name: Anonymous 2007-01-10 18:36

parentheses ******

Name: Anonymous 2007-01-11 15:53

CherryPy?

Newer Posts
Don't change these.
Name: Email:
Entire Thread Thread List