I figure all options do the same thing. Some programmer at Microsoft was just yanking our collective leg.
Name:
Anonymous2006-10-21 14:05
I believe abort meant terminate process; retry meant retry read operation, and fail means ok, pretend we've readed even though we haven't. Same goes for other operations.
Name:
Anonymous2006-10-22 5:56
>>12
But... no matter which one you pick, you'll be asked the same thing again.
Name:
Anonymous2006-10-22 6:59
>>12
No, Fail means terminate process, which is why it asks you for a drive letter and dumps you back to the command line. Abort asks the process nicely to stop, and the process decides on its own what it will do (which is why this always does unpredictable things).
( ) Report error to process
( ) Report error to process
( ) Let's pretend it worked
( ) Ask politely to exit
( ) Kill that shit
( ) Random choice :D
[ ] Don't ask me this shit again for this process
[ ] Don't ask me this shit again for this session
[ ] Don't ever ask me this shit again
Name:
Anonymous2006-10-22 12:32
The UNIX way of dealing with things is much simpler: Segmentation fault.
Core dumped.
hahaha loser!
Wtf "leaked"? I'm 99.999% sure that Microsoft officially released one of their older source codes.
Name:
Anonymous2009-02-24 20:43
This shit's ancient. The source code release, I mean.
Also,
! MS-DOS.6.0.Source.Code.zip: CRC failed in c6ers\tools6\bin\nmake.exe. The file is corrupt
! MS-DOS.6.0.Source.Code.zip: CRC failed in 45\beef\cw\tools\csl2.exe. The file is corrupt
Name:
Anonymous2009-02-24 20:55
I remember seeing this many many many years ago. I wonder if I still have a copy of it.
Name:
Anonymous2009-02-24 21:20
>>25-26
look at the date. >>1 is ancient. also, the IFCTF archive contains the ms-dos source code and some more interesting things too...