/prog/ - open source FAILS

Name: Anonymous 2006-10-13 22:07

go ahead, prove me wrong, communist faggots.

Name: Anonymous 2010-09-21 17:17

OP makes a valid point.

Name: Anonymous 2010-09-21 17:38

>>14
Stop necrobumping you fucking fucktard fuck

Name: Anonymous 2010-09-21 18:48

>>15
Problem, officer?

Name: Anonymous 2010-09-21 19:18

what a historic thread.
opensource, a thing of the past...

good riddance

Name: Anonymous 2010-09-21 23:50

>>14-san is an idiot.

Name: Sgt.Kabu셠孊kiman繄秫 2012-05-28 20:29

Bringing /prog/ back to its people
All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy
All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy
All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy
All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy
All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy
All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy
All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy
All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy
All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy
All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy
All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy
All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy
All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy
All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy
All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy
All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy
All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy

Name: Anonymous 2012-05-28 20:34

LOL OP, I think it's rather YOU that fails. Enjoy your buggy expensive bullshit. I'll stick with the programs I get for free, can fix if they break, have an active community of support/developers, teach me as I read their FREELY AVAILABLE SOURCE CODE, and allow security audits in the case of encryption software to be performed by ANYBODY - no backdoors, no bullshit.

But for real OP must be trolling.

open source FAILS

1 Name: Anonymous 2006-10-13 22:07

14 Name: Anonymous 2010-09-21 17:17

15 Name: Anonymous 2010-09-21 17:38

16 Name: Anonymous 2010-09-21 18:48

17 Name: Anonymous 2010-09-21 19:18

18 Name: Anonymous 2010-09-21 23:50

19 Name: Sgt.Kabu셠孊kiman繄秫 2012-05-28 20:29

20 Name: Anonymous 2012-05-28 20:34