/prog/ - C99 — World4ch

Name: Anonymous 2006-08-27 14:51

I hear C99 is superior.
Question is, how do I learned C99?

Name: Anonymous 2006-08-27 16:48

move 3 keys to the left, and let go of shift

Name: Anonymous 2006-08-27 20:08

I don't know of any compilers that implement C99 yet. Even GCC has a long way to go: http://gcc.gnu.org/c99status.html

D is superior.

Name: Anonymous 2006-08-27 20:51

>>3
Ruby > Slashdot > Reddit > Digg > D > Python

Name: Anonymous 2006-08-28 3:02

>>2
thou makest no sense

Name: Anonymous 2006-08-28 4:24

>>5
He's a Linux boy, and wants everyhing in lowercase because he's case-sensitive and has a complex with it.

>>4
world4ch > 4-ch > Slashdot > Pythonic > Ruby way

Name: Anonymous 2006-08-28 4:33

>>4
Digg > Hot Pockets > Firefox > Penny Lane > Slashdot

Name: Anonymous 2006-08-28 5:27

JAVA > COBOL > VB.NET > * > PYTHON, RUBY

Name: Anonymous 2006-08-28 9:28

>>8
Flamebait?

Name: Anonymous 2006-08-28 9:29

1 > 0.999999999~

Name: Anonymous 2006-08-28 9:36

Ruby > 1/0

Name: Anonymous 2006-08-28 15:40

Ruby < 1/-0

Name: Anonymous 2006-08-30 17:11

(Ruby / 0) > Infinity

Name: Anonymous 2006-08-30 17:31

hay guise whats goin on in dis fred

Name: Anonymous 2006-08-30 23:37

>>14
As it appears, maths lolz.

Name: Anonymous 2006-08-31 2:36

It's SCCCCCIIIIIIIIIEEEEEENNNNNNNCNCCCCCCCEE!

Name: Anonymous 2006-08-31 15:48

>>5
>>6
Hey retards, if you move three keys to the left and left go of shift while typing the ++'s in C++, you get C99.

Name: Anonymous 2006-09-01 6:15

>>17
not on Macintosh computers.

Name: Anonymous 2006-09-01 7:16

>>17
So what?

Name: Anonymous 2006-09-01 9:01

>>19
>>5,6

>>18
nobody writes code on a macintosh computer.

Name: Anonymous 2006-09-01 15:10

>>20
I do, with vim or Xcode, it's as good as Kdevelop.

Name: Anonymous 2006-09-01 15:25

>>21
And you are a nobody.

Name: Anonymous 2006-09-01 15:25

>>21
YOU --- GET THE FUCK OUT!

Name: Anonymous 2006-09-01 18:50

>>22
I'm a nobody who earns $40k/year to write code on Linux (and I'm just 24 years old which is a good beginning). Now go get me some more fries, that's the job you where hired for!

Name: Anonymous 2006-09-01 19:05

>>24
Lies. Macintosh lusers hate Lunix.

Name: Anonymous 2006-09-01 19:15 (sage)

>>24
that's actually kinda low. You'd better not be a java programmer lol.

Name: Anonymous 2006-09-01 19:42

>>24
lol, If you are trying to brag about earning $40k/year, then you better live in Montana or some place where the cost of living is extremely low, because otherwise you have nothing to brag about.

Name: Anonymous 2006-09-01 19:53 (sage)

>>25
mac=lunix, same shit.

Name: Anonymous 2006-09-02 4:24

>>27
I live in Montana. The cost of living is NOT very low. It's very hard to live here compared to most every other place in America, and it's getting even worse now that it costs most people waste $50-$60 every 2 days just to drive to and from their shitty, low-paying jobs at Albertsons and Safeway. The only reason some of the people in my town can live kind of well, and don't fall into the overwhelmingly large category of meth-smoking white trash that exists here is that many of them made UNGODLY amounts of money before they even came here. People in Montana have nothing to brag about, unless they live up near relatively rich places like Bozeman and Missoula, which probably means they made at least 70k+ before they came here.

Name: Anonymous 2006-09-02 6:57

>>28
LUNIX?

Shit...you're a fucking dumbass. Get off the internet.

Name: Anonymous 2006-09-02 23:26

LUnix is Linux for C64.

Name: Anonymous 2006-09-03 2:33

>>29
So basically, even if >>24 lives in Montana, his $40k/year sucks ass.

Name: Anonymous 2006-09-03 5:09

Montana has the 2nd highest gas costs in the nation. And they have to drive ALL over the fucking place.

Name: Anonymous 2006-09-03 11:25

>>30
murk loar

Name: Anonymous 2006-09-03 13:10

>>33
At least they get to drive fast.

Name: Anonymous 2006-09-03 18:11

>>30
You are the dumbass, murk loar

>>31
It used to be, murk loar stupid

>>33
Lol America

Name: Anonymous 2006-09-09 11:54 (sage)

>>31
Lunix is a somewhat, distantly unix-like whatchamacallit for the C64. Not Linux.

Name: Anonymous 2006-09-10 1:14

>>37
same fucking thing you moron

Name: Anonymous 2006-09-10 7:16

>>37
You're retarded. Lunix is Lunix. The penguin stuff.

Name: Anonymous 2006-09-10 7:17

Your logic is gay. Lunux sucks balls.

C99

1 Name: Anonymous 2006-08-27 14:51

2 Name: Anonymous 2006-08-27 16:48

3 Name: Anonymous 2006-08-27 20:08

4 Name: Anonymous 2006-08-27 20:51

5 Name: Anonymous 2006-08-28 3:02

6 Name: Anonymous 2006-08-28 4:24

7 Name: Anonymous 2006-08-28 4:33

8 Name: Anonymous 2006-08-28 5:27

9 Name: Anonymous 2006-08-28 9:28

10 Name: Anonymous 2006-08-28 9:29

11 Name: Anonymous 2006-08-28 9:36

12 Name: Anonymous 2006-08-28 15:40

13 Name: Anonymous 2006-08-30 17:11

14 Name: Anonymous 2006-08-30 17:31

15 Name: Anonymous 2006-08-30 23:37

16 Name: Anonymous 2006-08-31 2:36

17 Name: Anonymous 2006-08-31 15:48

18 Name: Anonymous 2006-09-01 6:15

19 Name: Anonymous 2006-09-01 7:16

20 Name: Anonymous 2006-09-01 9:01

21 Name: Anonymous 2006-09-01 15:10

22 Name: Anonymous 2006-09-01 15:25

23 Name: Anonymous 2006-09-01 15:25

24 Name: Anonymous 2006-09-01 18:50

25 Name: Anonymous 2006-09-01 19:05

26 Name: Anonymous 2006-09-01 19:15 (sage)

27 Name: Anonymous 2006-09-01 19:42

28 Name: Anonymous 2006-09-01 19:53 (sage)

29 Name: Anonymous 2006-09-02 4:24

30 Name: Anonymous 2006-09-02 6:57

31 Name: Anonymous 2006-09-02 23:26

32 Name: Anonymous 2006-09-03 2:33

33 Name: Anonymous 2006-09-03 5:09

34 Name: Anonymous 2006-09-03 11:25

35 Name: Anonymous 2006-09-03 13:10

36 Name: Anonymous 2006-09-03 18:11

37 Name: Anonymous 2006-09-09 11:54 (sage)

38 Name: Anonymous 2006-09-10 1:14

39 Name: Anonymous 2006-09-10 7:16

40 Name: Anonymous 2006-09-10 7:17

Name: Anonymous 2006-08-27 14:51

Name: Anonymous 2006-08-27 16:48

Name: Anonymous 2006-08-27 20:08

Name: Anonymous 2006-08-27 20:51

Name: Anonymous 2006-08-28 3:02

Name: Anonymous 2006-08-28 4:24

Name: Anonymous 2006-08-28 4:33

Name: Anonymous 2006-08-28 5:27

Name: Anonymous 2006-08-28 9:28

Name: Anonymous 2006-08-28 9:29

Name: Anonymous 2006-08-28 9:36

Name: Anonymous 2006-08-28 15:40

Name: Anonymous 2006-08-30 17:11

Name: Anonymous 2006-08-30 17:31

Name: Anonymous 2006-08-30 23:37

Name: Anonymous 2006-08-31 2:36

Name: Anonymous 2006-08-31 15:48

Name: Anonymous 2006-09-01 6:15

Name: Anonymous 2006-09-01 7:16

Name: Anonymous 2006-09-01 9:01

Name: Anonymous 2006-09-01 15:10

Name: Anonymous 2006-09-01 15:25

Name: Anonymous 2006-09-01 15:25

Name: Anonymous 2006-09-01 18:50

Name: Anonymous 2006-09-01 19:05

Name: Anonymous 2006-09-01 19:15 (sage)

Name: Anonymous 2006-09-01 19:42

Name: Anonymous 2006-09-01 19:53 (sage)

Name: Anonymous 2006-09-02 4:24

Name: Anonymous 2006-09-02 6:57

Name: Anonymous 2006-09-02 23:26

Name: Anonymous 2006-09-03 2:33

Name: Anonymous 2006-09-03 5:09

Name: Anonymous 2006-09-03 11:25

Name: Anonymous 2006-09-03 13:10

Name: Anonymous 2006-09-03 18:11

Name: Anonymous 2006-09-09 11:54 (sage)

Name: Anonymous 2006-09-10 1:14

Name: Anonymous 2006-09-10 7:16

Name: Anonymous 2006-09-10 7:17