>>9
You are obviously an idiot who has never done actual game engine or graphics programming. Perhaps in 100 years when we don't have to worry about performance, we will be able to do without those "archaic languages". If Ruby was really better, don't you think that it would be used commercially?
I don't get how you can be such a fanboy of a programming language. True programmers realize that different languages are better for different tasks. If you don't recognize this, then you are a mediocre and easily replaceable programmer.