Return Styles: Pseud0ch, Terminal, Valhalla, NES, Geocities, Blue Moon.

Pages: 1-

Ruby? Viable?

Name: Anonymous 2006-08-02 19:41

How does Ruby fare in terms of a means to code distributable applications? I'm new to programming and have been working with Python, but something about Ruby attracts me.

Rubygarden says it will have more overhead than C++, but I don't think I'm ready to learn C++, especially working more with Mac/Linux.

Is there any PyObjC-esque extenstion to Ruby?

Name: Anonymous 2006-08-02 20:17

Stop the compiled python circle jerk. IT ISNT FAST IT IS JUST PRE-PARSED.

Name: Anonymous 2006-08-02 20:24

>>2

???

Name: Anonymous 2006-08-02 23:50

Ruby - SLOW AS HELL!

Name: Anonymous 2006-08-03 1:39

>>1
if you want to get into ruby on a mac, recompile it from source as the version coming with osx is broken in some ways and outdated.

Name: Anonymous 2006-08-03 2:34

What I am asking is wether or not Ruby is viable as more than just using it with Rails for web environments.

Name: Anonymous 2006-08-03 2:36

no.

Name: Anonymous 2006-08-03 3:31

>>7, means to say ''yes.''

Ruby is going to replace C++/Java.

Name: Anonymous 2006-08-03 3:48 (sage)

>>8
Ruby is going to replace C++/Java.

I LOL'd

Name: Anonymous 2006-08-03 4:56

Well, maybe java...

Name: Anonymous 2006-08-03 10:08

No it won't replace java. Java scales. Ruby doesn't. Java has great namespaces. Ruby has hack namespaces (import filename HURRRRR). Ruby lacks the maturity to achieve the kinds of Java does. Ruby even sucks at GUI programming (UNLESS YOU COUNT ROR). Java has libraries which can generate Swing GUIs and AJAX GUIs at the same time with the same code.

Name: Anonymous 2006-08-03 10:14 (sage)

>>11
swing is slower than drawing windows 1 pixel at a time with javascript.

Name: Anonymous 2006-08-03 10:19

Why not just drop that stuff and go full out Obj.C?

Name: Anonymous 2006-08-03 11:31

>>8
Weeaboo

>>10
That wouldn't be so bad

>>11
zOMG SCALES SCALES!!! Fap to http://www.metalsmith.org/gall/wilsondv/dragon03.jpg and GTFO

What's wrong with import filename? Files have a name for a reason. Ruby lacks maturity, but Java has proven time or popularity doesn't bring maturity either, let alone decency. Java sucks at GUI programming too. Also >>12 . Swing is an enterprise solution.

Name: Anonymous 2006-08-04 3:43

HTML will replace C++ and Java and Ruby and Brainfuck.

Name: Anonymous 2006-08-04 9:38

If you are currently using Python, I don't think there's any particularly good reason to learn Ruby unless you *really* want to. I actually "switched" from Ruby to Python after many years of Ruby use.

The Ruby equivalent of PyObjC is called RubyCocoa, but it isn't nearly as polished as PyObjC.

Name: Anonymous 2006-08-04 9:55

Ruby has a nicer syntax than Python, but damn it's slow. And no unicode? :(

Also, those regex suck. Matz was bright enough to rip off some ideas from Perl, but mandatory sub/gsub() is !@#$%^ retarded. I want my s///!

Name: Anonymous 2006-08-04 11:30

>>17
Nicer syntax: Disagree, looks kinda ugly
Slow: Agree, though not TOO important (still important)
No Unicode: Shit sux, major disadvantage
Regex: Don't know how they are in Ruby; Python's infuriated me so I wrote a wrapper for them which I'm still evolving into the simplest possible thing



Name: Anonymous 2009-01-14 13:34

JAVA fails

Name: Anonymous 2011-02-04 16:31

Name: Anonymous 2011-02-18 13:29

check 'em

Name: Sgt.Kabu雛画kimanᎭ雓 2012-05-28 19:50

Bringing /prog/ back to its people
All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy
All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy
All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy
All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy
All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy
All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy
All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy
All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy
All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy
All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy
All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy
All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy
All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy
All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy
All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy
All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy
All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy
All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy
All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy
All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy
All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy
All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy
All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy
All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy
All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy

Don't change these.
Name: Email:
Entire Thread Thread List