It has come to my attention that there are now various tutorials and books online whose title would perhaps be more fittingly Haskell For Complete Retards (i.e. People Whose Title Is "Software Developer"). Seeing as how market saturation == market demand, I am forced to conclude that there are Complete Retards now out there who are using Haskell. This is unacceptable. I'm switching to Epigram, a language which, presumably, cannot be comprehended by Complete Retards.
Name:
Anonymous2006-05-24 21:48
darcs is in haskell and it is beautiful.
Name:
Anonymous2006-05-26 3:45
>>2
darcs rocks, it's the only revision control system that doesn't make me want to rip my nuts off.
Name:
Anonymous2006-05-26 15:16
Haskell is cool. You can actually fit a program that does something useful in one screenful.
Market demand can suck my cock. For money I'll program javur if the man pays me enough. What I do for my own fun is my own damn business. (With the current employment contract legislation over here in civilized yurp it is, anyway.)
Name:
Anonymous2006-05-26 17:39
>>4
However, it doesn't say anything about the time it takes to write a screenful of Haskell that does something useful.
Name:
Anonymous2006-05-26 21:43
>>5
Less time than Java or other languages out there. Why don't you try it one day?
Name:
Anonymous2006-05-27 7:01
>>6
I would (I'm seriously considering trying Lisp or Haskell on summer when I get more time), but comparing to Java does Haskell no good; anything decent be more productive than Java.
>>26
If you'll notice, he said world retard. I don't know who the world retard is, but looking at your response, I'm inclined to believe it is you that he doesn't like.
Name:
Anonymous2009-06-02 18:02
>>27
you're retardedness transcends political boundaries.